A Comparison of Cohabiting and Noncohabiting Couples Who Participated in Premarital Counseling Using the PREPARE Model

Abstract

Premarital counseling is a preventive tool against future marital discord. Research targeting premarital counseling interventions typically examined the effects of the intervention on later marital unions, as well as risk factors associated with cohabiting. This study evaluated differences among 120 premarital counseling participants using the PREPARE model. However, not all participants completed treatment. Therefore, we examined differences in preintervention levels of relationship satisfaction, as measured by the Marital Adjustment Test and individual distress, as measured by the Outcomes Questionnaire 45.2 between participants that completed premarital counseling (n = 46) versus those that did not (n = 74). Participants who completed attended an average of eight sessions. Additionally, for the 46 men (n = 23) and women (n = 23) who completed premarital counseling, changes in relationship satisfaction and individual distress were examined along with differences between those who were cohabiting (n = 28; 14 men and 14 women) and noncohabiting (n = 18; 9 men and 9 women). The authors found statistically significant improvements in relationship satisfaction for men and women who completed premarital counseling and statistically significant improvements in individual distress for men upon completion of treatment. The authors also found statistically significant differences in relationship satisfaction for men and women between those who completed and those who did not complete the premarital counseling treatment. Implications for couples counselors, as well as recommendations for future research, are discussed.

Keywords

PREPARE cohabit premarital couples individual distress

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beach

S. R. H.

Cassidy

J. F.

(1991). The marital discord model of depression. Comprehensive Mental Health Care, 1, 119–136.

Buchler

Baxter

Haynes

Western

(2009). The social and demographic characteristics of cohabiters in Australia. Family Matters, 82, 22–29.

Carroll

J. S.

Doherty

W. J.

(2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of premarital prevention programs: A meta-analytic review of outcome research. Family Relations, 52, 105–118.

Christensen

Atkins

D. C.

Baucom

D. H.

George

W. H.

(2006). Couple and individual adjustment for 2 years following a randomized clinical trial comparing traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1180–1191.

Christensen

Baucom

D. H.

C. T.-A.

Stanton

(2005). Methodologically sound, cost-effective research on the outcome of couple therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 6–17.

Clements

M. L.

Stanley

S. M.

Markman

H. J.

(2004). Before they said “I Do”: Discriminating among marital outcomes over 13 years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 613–626.

Cohen

J. W.

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Conger

R. D.

Conger

K. J.

Elder

G. H.

Lorenze

F. O.

Simons

R. L.

Whitbeck

L. B.

(1992). A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Development, 63, 526–541.

Dakin

Wampler

(2008). Money doesn’t buy happiness, but it helps: Marital satisfaction, psychological distress, and demographic differences between low-and middle-income clinic couples. American Journal of Family therapy, 36, 300–311.

10.

Fowers

B. J.

Montel

K. H.

Olson

D. H.

(1996). Predicting marital success for premarital couple types based on PREPARE. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 22, 103–122.

11.

Freeston

M. H.

Plechaty

(1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace marital adjustment test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s? Psychological Reports, 81, 419–434.

12.

Isakson

R. L.

Hawkins

E. J.

Harmon

S. C.

Slade

Martinez

J. S.

Lambert

M. J.

(2006). Assessing couple therapy as a treatment for individual distress: When is referral to couple therapy contraindicated? Contemporary Family Therapy, 28, 313–322.

13.

Jose

O’Leary

Moyer

(2010). Does premarital cohabitation predict subsequent marital Stability and marital quality? A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 105–116.

14.

Kline

G. H.

Stanley

S. M.

Markman

H. J.

Olmos-Gallo

P. A.

Peters

M. S.

Whitting

S. W.

Prado

L. M.

(2004). Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 311–318.

15.

Lambert

M. J.

Morton

J. J.

Hatfield

Harmon

Hamilton

Reid

R. C.

… Burlingame

G. M

. (2004). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ. 45.2. Orem, UT: American Professional Credentialing Services.

16.

Larsen

A. S.

Olson

D. H.

(1989). Predicting marital satisfaction using PREPARE: A replication study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 311–333.

17.

Locke

H. J.

Wallace

K. M.

(1959). Short marital-adjustment and predication tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255.

18.

Lundblad

A.-M.

Hansson

(2006). Couples therapy: Effectiveness of treatment and long-term follow-up. Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 136–152.

19.

Markman

H. J.

(1981). Predication of marital distress: A 5-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 760–762.

20.

Markman

H. J.

Rhoades

Stanley

Ragan

Whitton

(2010). The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce: The first five years of marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 289–298. doi:10.1037/a0019481.

21.

Murray

C. E.

(2004). The relative influence of client characteristics on the process and outcomes of premarital counseling: A survey of providers. Contemporary Family Therapy, 26, 447–463.

22.

O’Leary

K. D.

Beach

S. R. H.

(1990). Marital therapy: A viable treatment for depression and marital discord. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 183–186.

23.

Olson

D. H.

(2002). PREPARE/ENRICH counselor’s manual. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.

24.

Olson

D. H.

Olson

A. K.

(2000). Empowering couples: Building on your strengths. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.

25.

Schumm

W. R.

Walker

A. B.

Nazarinia

R. R.

West

D. A.

Atwell

Barko

Kriley

(2010). Predicting the short- and long-term helpfulness of premarital counseling: The critical role of counseling quality. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 9, 1–15.

26.

Stanley

S. M.

(2001). Making a case for premarital education. Family Relations, 50, 272–280.

27.

Stanley

S. M.

Amato

P. R.

Johnson

C. A.

Markman

H. J.

(2006). Premarital education, marital quality, and marital stability: Findings from a large, random household survey. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 117–126.

28.

Stanley

S. M.

Rhoades

G. K.

Markman

H. J.

(2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509.

29.

Stanley

S. M.

Whitton

S. W.

Markman

H. J.

(2004). Maybe I Do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 496–519.

30.

Stoltenberg

C. D.

McNeill

B. W.

(2010). IDM supervision: An integrative developmental model for supervising counselors and therapists (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.