Empathy is directly related to one’s satisfaction with a romantic partner, and therefore, most approaches to couples therapy explicitly address empathy as a means for creating positive relational change. Imago relationship therapy (IRT) is practiced extensively worldwide yet lacks research validating its effectiveness. Given IRT’s focus on developing empathy within the members of the romantic partnership, it is important to examine how empathy contributes to change in relationship satisfaction. This random and controlled study examined the impact of 12 weeks of IRT treatment on individual (N = 60) empathy levels. Results showed a significant interaction between time and condition and found significant increases in treatment group empathy levels at each of three assessment points. These findings begin to emphasize the impact of IRT on couple empathy levels and highlight the potential benefits of using this particular therapeutic modality to promote positive relational change within romantic relationships. The research would have benefited from greater diversity within the sample and a greater understanding of the specific therapist interventions that impact client couple empathy levels.
BagniniC. (2012). Keeping couples in treatment: Working from surface to depth. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.
2.
BeachS. R. H.DreifussJ. A.FranklinK. J.KlamenC.GabrielB. (2008). Couple therapy and the treatment of depression. In GurmanA. S. (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 545–566). New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
BernardH. R. (2012). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
CarrèreS.BuehlmanK. T.GottmanJ. M.CoanJ. A.RuckstuhlL. (2000). Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 42–58. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.14 .1.42
5.
CliffordsonC. (2001). Parents’ judgments and students’ self-judgments of empathy: The structure of empathy and agreement of judgments based on the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 36–47. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.17.1.36
6.
CliffordsonC. (2002). The hierarchical structure of empathy: Dimensional organization and relations to social functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 49–59. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00268
7.
CollinsN. L.KaneH. S.MetzM. A.ClevelandC.KhanC.WinczewskiL.ProkT. (2014). Psychological, physiological, and behavioral responses to a partner in need: The role of compassionate love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 601–629. doi:10.1177/0265407514529069
8.
CramerD.JowettS. (2010). Perceived empathy, accurate empathy and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 327–349. doi:10.1177/0265407509348384
9.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85. Retrieved fromhttp://www.uv.es/∼friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf
10.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
11.
DavisM. H. (1996). Empathy: A social-psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
12.
de KempR.OverbeekG.de WiedM.EngelsR.ScholteR. (2007). Early adolescent empathy, parental support, and antisocial behavior. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 5–18. Retrieved fromhttp://www.tandfonline.com/toc/vgnt20/current
13.
DecetyJ.JacksonP. L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 54–58. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x
14.
DijkstraP.BareldsD. P.GroothofH. A.Van BruggenM. (2014). Empathy in intimate relationships: The role of positive illusions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 477–482. doi:10.1111/sjop.12142
15.
DohertyW. J.SimmonsD. S. (1996). Clinical practice patterns of marriage and family therapists: A national survey of therapists and their clients. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 22, 9–25. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1996.tb00183.x
16.
EisenbergN.FabesR. (1998). Prosocial development. In DamnonW.EisenbergN. (Eds.), The handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701–778). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
17.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L.Van VleetM.TomlinsonJ. M. (2013). Motivations for providing a secure base: Links with attachment orientation and secure base support behavior. Attachment and Human Development, 15, 261–280. doi:10.1080/14616734.2013.782654
18.
FernándezA. M.DufeyM.KrampU. (2015). Testing the psychometric properties of the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) in Chile. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 179–185. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000065
19.
GehlertN. C.SchmidtC. D.GiegerichV.LuquetW. (2016). Randomized controlled trial of imago relationship therapy: Exploring statistical and clinical significance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20.
GottmanJ. M.GottmanJ. S. (2008). Gottman method of couple therapy. In GurmanA. S. (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 138–164). New York, NY: Guilford.
21.
GreasonP. B.CashwellC. S. (2009). Mindfulness and counseling self-efficacy: The mediating role of attention and empathy. Counselor Education and Supervision, 49, 2–19. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2009.tb00083.x
22.
GreenbergL. S. (2010). Emotion-focused therapy: A clinical synthesis. Focus, 8, 32–42.
23.
HannahM. T.LuquetW.McCormickJ. (1997). COMPASS as a measure of the efficacy of couples’ therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 76–91. Retrieved fromhttp://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uaft20#.V02wifkrLIU
24.
HannahM. T.LuquetW.McCormickJ.GalvinK.KettererK.MayK.…KottL. A. (1997). Short-term imago therapy and changes in personal distress. Journal of Imago Relationship Therapy, 2, 55–65.
25.
HawkS. T.KeijsersL.BranjeS. J.GraaffJ. V. D.WiedM. D.MeeusW. (2013). Examining the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) among early and late adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 96–106. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.696080
26.
HendrixH. (2008). Getting the love you want: A guide for couples. New York, NY: Owl Books. (Original work published 1988)
27.
HillE. W. (2010). Discovering forgiveness through empathy: Implications for couple and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 169–185. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00492.x
28.
HollimanR.MuroL.LuquetW. (2016). Common factors between couples therapists and imago relationship therapy: A survey of shared beliefs, values, and intervention strategies. The Family Journal, 24, 230–238. doi:1066480716648693.
29.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B. (2012). Social relationships and mortality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 41–53. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00406.x
30.
Imago Relationships International. (2014). Clinical training in imago relationship therapy: Training manual text. Lexington, KY: Author.
JacobsonN. S.MargolinG. (1979). Marital therapy: Strategies based on social learning and behavior exchange principles. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
33.
JacobsonN. S.TruaxP. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/ccp/
34.
JohnsonS. M.WhiffenV. (1999). Made to measure: Attachment styles in couples therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, Special Edition on Individual Differences and Couples Therapy, 6, 366–381. Retrieved fromhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2850
35.
LakeyB.OrehekE. (2011). Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health. Psychological Review, 118, 482–495. doi:10.1037/a0023477
36.
LebowJ. L.ChambersA. L.ChristensenA.JohnsonS. M. (2012). Research on the treatment of couple distress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 145–168. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00249.x
37.
LennonR.EisenbergN. (1987). Gender and age differences in empathy and sympathy. In EisenbergN. (Ed.), Empathy and its development (pp. 195–217). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LeoneC. (2008). Couple therapy from the perspective of self psychology and intersubjectivity theory. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25, 79–98. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.25.1.79
39.
LivingstonM. S. (1995). A self psychologist in couplesland: Multisubjective approach to transference and countertransference-like phenomena in marital relationships. Family Process, 34, 427–439. doi:10.1111/ j.1545-5300.1995.00427.x
40.
LivingstonM. S. (2009). Sustained empathic focus and its application in the treatment of couples. Clinical Social Work Journal, 37, 183–189. doi:10.1007/s10615-009-0206-4
41.
LockeH. J.WallaceK. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255. doi:10.2307/348022
42.
LoveP.ShulkinS. (2001). Imago theory and the psychology of attraction. The Family Journal, 9, 246–249. doi:10.1177/1066480701093002
43.
LuquetW.HannahM.T. (1996). The efficacy of brief imago therapy: Preliminary findings. Journal of Imago Relationship Therapy, 1, 67–75.
44.
MarmaroshC. L. (2014). Fostering new relational experience: Clinical process in couple psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 51, 1–6. doi:10.1037/a0032710
45.
MartinT. L.BielawskiD. M. (2011). What is the African American’s experience following imago education?Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 51, 216–228. doi:10.1177/0022167809352379
46.
MasonR. C. (2005). Imago, relationships and empathy. In HendrixH.HuntH. L.HannahM. T.LuquetW. (Eds.), Imago relationship theory. Perspectives on theory (pp. 139–161). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47.
McCormackC. C. (2000). Treating borderline states in marriage: Dealing with oppositionalism, ruthless aggression, and severe resistance. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
48.
MuroL.HollimanR.LuquetW. (2015). Imago relationship therapy and accurate empathy development. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 15, 1–17. doi:0.1080/15332691.2015.1024373
PattersonT. (2005). Cognitive behavioral couple therapy. In HarwayM. (Ed.), Handbook of couples therapy (pp. 119–140). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
51.
PéloquinK.LafontaineM. F. (2010). Measuring empathy in couples: Validity and reliability of the interpersonal reactivity index for couples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 146–157. doi:10.1080/00223890903510399
52.
Perrone-McGovernK. M.Oliveira-SilvaP.Simon-DackS.Lefdahl-DavisE.AdamsD.McConnellJ.GonçalvesÓ. F. (2014). Effects of empathy and conflict resolution strategies on psychophysiological arousal and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 39, 19–25. doi:10.1007/s10484-013-9237-2
QuinceT. A.ParkerR. A.WoodD. F.BensonJ. A. (2011). Stability of empathy among undergraduate medical students: A longitudinal study at one UK medical school. BMC Medical Education, 11, 1–9. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-90
ScharffD. E.ScharffJ. S. (1991). Object relations couples therapy. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
57.
SchmidtC. D.LuquetW.GehlertN. C. (2016). Evaluating the impact of the “getting the love you want” couples workshop on relational satisfaction and communication patterns. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 15, 1–18.
58.
SiegelJ. P. (1992). Repairing intimacy: An object relations approach to couples therapy. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.
59.
SnyderD. K.CastellaniA. M.WhismanM. A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 317–344. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070154
60.
SnyderD. K.HalfordW. K. (2012). Evidence-based couple therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 34, 229–249. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2012.00599.x
61.
SolomonM. (1985). Treatment of narcissistic and borderline disorders in marital therapy: Suggestions toward an enhanced therapeutic approach. Clinical Social Work Journal, 13, 141–156. doi:10.1007/BF00755479
62.
StocksE. L.LishnerD. A.WaitsB. L.DownumE. M. (2011). I’m embarrassed for you: The effect of valuing and perspective taking on empathic embarrassment and empathic concern. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00699.x
63.
UchinoB. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 236–255. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x
64.
UnderwoodL. G. (2002). The human experience of compassionate love. In PostS. G.UnderwoodL. G.SchlossJ.HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love (pp. 72–88). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
