In this study, 273 couples therapists were surveyed regarding their alignment with the beliefs, values, and intervention strategies of Imago Relationship Therapy (IRT). The Likert-type scale survey utilized 46 items reflecting 6 key domains important to the theory and practice. All domains reflected a minimum of 50% therapist agreement while 4 of the 6 domains reflected 75% or greater therapist agreement. Due to reported agreement with a majority of IRT domains, these findings suggest (1) potential common factors between IRT and couples therapists of diverse theoretical approaches and (2) a rationale for the consideration of IRT as an area of study for academics researchers and a model of training in marriage and family therapy programs.
BeidasR. S.AaronsG.BargF.EvansA.HadleyT.HoagwoodK.…MandellD. S. (2013). Policy to implementation: Evidence-based practice in community mental health. Implementation Sciences, 8, 1–9.
2.
BoyA. V.PineG. J. (1983). Counseling: Fundamentals of theoretical renewal. Counseling and Values, 27, 248–255.
Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2009). 2009 standards for accreditation. Alexandria, VA: Author.
5.
D’AnielloC. (2013). Contemporary MFT models’ alignment with relational common factors. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 673–683.
6.
DavisS. D.PiercyF. P. (2007a). What clients of couple therapy model developers and their former students say about change, part I: Model-dependent common factors across three models. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 318–343.
7.
DavisS. D.PiercyF. P. (2007b). What clients of couple therapy model developers and their former students say about change, part I: Model-dependent common factors across three models. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 344–363.
8.
GordonL.FrandsenJ. (2001). Passage to intimacy. New York, NY: Fireside Books.
9.
GottmanJ. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically based marital therapy. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
10.
GurmanA. S. (2008). Clinical handbook of couple therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
HannahM. T.LuquetW. J. (1997). Compass as a measure of efficacy of couples therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 76–90.
12.
HannahM. T.LuquetW.McCormickJ.GalvinK.KettererK.MayK.…KotL. (1997). Brief report: Short-term Imago therapy and changes in personal and relationship distress. The Journal of Imago Relationship Therapy, 2, 55–65.
13.
HansenJ. C.WarnerR. W.StevicR. R. (1986). Counseling: Theory and process. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
HelmekeK. B.ProutyA. M.BischofG. H. (2015). Couple therapy. In WetchlerJ. L.HecklerL. L. (Eds.), An introduction to marriage and family therapy (2nd ed., pp.359–400). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
HendrixH. (1986). Getting the love you want: A guide for couples. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
16.
HendrixH. (2005). The evolution of imago relationship therapy: A personal and professional journey. In HendrixH.HuntH.HannahM. T.LuquetW. (Eds.), Imago relationship therapy: Perspective on theory (pp.13–34). New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
17.
HendrixH.HuntH.HannahM. T.LuquetW. (2005). Imago relationship therapy: Perspectives on theory. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
LambertM. J. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapists. In NorcrossJ. C.GoldfriedM. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 94–129). New York, NY: Basic Books.
20.
LuquetW. (1996). Short-term couples therapy: The Imago model in action. New York, NY: Brunner-Mazel.
21.
LuquetW.HannahM. T. (1996). The efficacy of short-term Imago therapy: Preliminary findings. The Journal of Imago Relationship Therapy, 1, 67–74.
22.
LuquetW.HannahM. T. (1998). Healing in the relational paradigm: The Imago relationship therapy casebook. New York, NY: Brunner/Routledge.
23.
LuquetW. J., (with commentaries fromBrownR.ShulkinS.ShulkinM.BrainertG.). (1999). Can one model of couples therapy stand on its own?The Journal of Imago Relationship Therapy, 3, 1–32.
24.
MechanicD. (2012). Seizing opportunities under the Affordable Care Act for transforming the mental and behavioral health systems. Health Affairs, 31, 376–382.
RogersC. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
RosenzweigS. (1936). Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 6, 412–415.
28.
SchmidtC.LuquetW.GehlertN. (2016). Evaluating the impact of the “Getting the Love You Want” couples workshop on relational satisfaction and communication patterns. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 15, 1–18.
29.
SextonT. L.RidleyC. R.KleinerA. J. (2004). Beyond common factors: Multilevel-process models of therapeutic change in marital and family therapy. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 30, 131–149.
30.
SprenkleD. H.BlowA. J. (2004). Common factors and our sacred models. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 113–129.
31.
SprenkleD. H.BlowA. J.DickeyM. H. (1999). Common factors and other nontechnique variables in marriage and family therapy. In HubbleM. A.DuncanB. L.MillerS. D. (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 329–360). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
SprenkleD. H.DavisS. D.LebowJ. L. (2009). Common factors in couple and family therapy: The overlooked foundation for effective practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
StanleyS.BlumbergS. L.MarkmanH. J. (2001). Fighting for your marriage. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
