Semistructured interviews were conducted with nine parents with children diagnosed with reading disability (RD). A phenomenological theoretical tradition was used to explore the meaning, structure, and essence of the shared experiences of these individuals. Results generated a deeper understanding of the lived experiences and challenges of families with children diagnosed with RD. Themes produced a need for a systemic model of home, school, and community collaboration, which may improve interaction and communication among all parties. Implications for research and working with families with children diagnosed with RD are discussed.
AdelmanH. S.TaylorL. (2007). Systemic change for school improvement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 55–77. doi:10.1207/s1532768Xjepc1701_3
2.
ArnoldE. M.GoldstonD. B.WalshA. K.ReboussinB. A.DanielS. S.HickmanE.WoodF. B. (2005). Severity of emotional and behavioral problems among poor and typical readers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 205–217.
3.
BakerL. (2003). The role of parents in motivating struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 87–106. doi:10.1080/10573560308207
4.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
5.
BosworthK.WalzG. (2005). Promoting student resiliency. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
6.
BrooksR. B. (1994). Children at risk: Fostering resilience and hope. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry64, 345–553. doi:10.1037/h0079565
7.
ChenX. (2001). Efforts by public schools to involve parents in children’s education: Do school parent reports agree? (NCES #076). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
8.
ChristensonS. L.CarlsonC.ValdezC. R. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Opportunities, challenges, and cautions. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 414–446. doi:10.1521/scpq.17.4.466.20862
9.
CopeN.HaroldD.HillG.MoskvinaV.StevensonJ.HolmansP.WilliamsJ. (2005). Strong evidence that KIAA0319 on chromosome 6 is a susceptibility gene for developmental dyslexia. American Journal of Human Genetics, 76, 581–591. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cell.com/AJHG/
10.
CortiellaC. (2011). The state of learning disabilities. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncld.org/stateofld/
11.
CowieK.QuinnK.GunningM. P.GunningK. M. (1998). School/home issues related to grief and loss within the families of disabled students: A systems approach. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 6, 141–146.
12.
CoxD. D. (2005). Evidence-based interventions: Using home-school collaboration. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 473–497. doi:10.1521/scpq.2005.20.4.473
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
DentonC. A. (2012). Response to intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: Some answers and lingering questions. Journal of Learning Disability, 45, 232–243.
15.
DonawaW. (1995). Growing up dyslexic: A parent’s view. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 324–328. doi:10.1177/002221949502800602
16.
EpsteinJ. L.VoorhisF. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 181–194. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3603_3
17.
EpsteinJ. L.VoorhisF. L. (2010). School counselors’ roles in developing partnerships with families and community for student success. Professional School Counseling, 14, 1–14. Retrieved fromhttp://www.schoolcounselor.org/
18.
GriffinD.SteenS. (2010). School-family-community partnerships: Applying Epstein's theory of the six types of involvement to school counselor practice. Professional School Counseling, 13, 218–226. Retrieved fromhttp://www.schoolcounselor.org/
HoK. M.KeileyM. K. (2003). Dealing with denial: A systems approach for family professionals working with parents of individuals with multiple disabilities. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 11, 239–247. doi:10.1177/1066480703251891
23.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (2010). IDEA Part B—Child Count, Students Ages 6-21. Retrieved fromhttp://www.IDEAdata.org.
24.
LernerJ. (1989). Educational interventions in learning disabilities. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 326–331. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jaacap.com/
25.
LynchR. T.MorleyK. L. (1995). Adaptation to pediatric physical disability within the family system: A conceptual model for counseling families. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 3, 207–217.
26.
MachekG. R.NelsonJ. M. (2010). School psychologists’ perceptions regarding the practice of identifying reading disabilities: Cognitive assessment and response to intervention considerations. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 230–245. doi:10.1002/pits.20467
27.
MadausM. R.KehleT. J.MadausJ.BrayM. A. (2003). Mystery motivator as an intervention to promote homework completion and accuracy. School Psychology International, 24, 369–377. doi:10.1177/01430343030244001
28.
MahoneyJ. L. (2000). Participation in school extracurricular activities as a moderator in the development of antisocial patterns. Child Development, 71, 502–516. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00160
29.
MahoneyJ. L.StattinH.MagnussonD. (2001). Youth recreation center participation and criminal offending: A 20-year longitudinal study of Swedish boys. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 509–520. doi:10.1080/01650250042000456
30.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
OlsonR. K.ForsbergH.WiseB. (1994). Genes, environment, and the development of orthographic skills. In BerningerV. W. (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge in theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 27–71). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
SatirV.BitterJ. R. (2000). The therapist and family therapy: Satir’s human validation process model. In HorneA. (Ed.), Family counseling and therapy (3rd ed., pp. 62–101). Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
34.
ScheinE. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35.
StraussA. S.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
36.
ValleJ. W. (2009). What mothers say about special education: From the 1960s to the present. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
ValleJ. W. (2011). Down the rabbit hole: A commentary about research on parents and special education. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 183–190. doi:10.1177/0731948711417555
38.
VellutinoF. R.FletcherJ. M.SnowlingM. J.ScanlonD. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry45, 2–40. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
39.
WehmeyerM. L. (2007). Promoting self-determination in students with developmental disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
YsseldykeJ. E.ChristensonS. L. (2002). FAAB: Functional assessment of academic behavior. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
