Modern Congressional Election Theory Meets the 1992 House Elections

Abstract

The events surrounding the 1992 congressional elections—the check-kiting scandal, the last opportunity to convert campaign funds to personal funds, redistricting, and a public allegedly soured on Congress subsequent to pay raises, scandals, and the Thomas-Hill hearings-provided a unique oppor tunity to test the prevailing models of congressional elections. In this research, we analyze the forces that contributed to the coming of 110 new members to the 103rd Congress. Our conclusion is that, while some aspects of the 1992 elections were unusual, the basic statutes of modem congressional election theory still apply if some needed, friendly amendments are added. Candidates continued to behave strategically, for example, but 1992 indicates the importance of developing the concept of strategic behavior for incumbents as well as challengers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bond, Jon R. , Cary Covington , and Richard Fleisher. 1985. "Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections." Journal of Politics 47: 510-29.

Brace, Paul. 1985. "A Probabilistic Approach to Retirement from the U.S. Congress." Legislative Studies Quarterly 10: 107-24.

Cooper, Joseph , and William West. 1981. "Voluntary Retirement, Incumbency, and the Modern House ." Political Science Quarterly 96: 279-300.

Dodd, Lawrence C. , and Bruce I. Oppenheimer 1993. Congress Reconsidered: Fifth Edition. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Fowler, Linda L. , and Robert D. McClure. 1989. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress? New Haven: Yale University Press.

Frantzich, Stephen E. 1978. "De-Recruitment: The Other Side of the Congressional Equation ." Western Political Quarterly 31: 105-26.

Green, Donald Philip , and Jonathan S. Krasno . 1988. "Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections ." American Journal of Political Science 32: 884-907.

Hibbing, John R. 1982. "Voluntary Retirement from the U.S. House of Representatives: Who Quits?" American Journal of Political Science 30: 651-65.

_. 1991. Congressional Careers. Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press.

10.

Hinckley, Barbara. 1981. Congressional Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

11.

Hook, Janet. 1991. "Will Flood of Retirements Arrive in 1992?" Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 49 (12 January): 72-78.

12.

_. 1992. "Voters Will Render Judgments on Members' Checking Habits ." Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 50 (18 April): 991-93.

13.

Jacobson, Gary C. 1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.

14.

_. 1992. The Politics of Congressional Elections Third Edition . Boston: Little, Brown.

15.

Jacobson, Gary C. , and Samuel Kernell. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections . New Haven: Yale University Press .

16.

Katz, Jeffrey L. 1992. "Record Rate of Retirements Suggests Major Shakeup ." Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 50 (4 April): 851-55.

17.

Mayhew, David R. 1974. "Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals ." Polity 6: 295-317.

18.

Moore, Michael K. , and John R. Hibbing . 1992. "Is Serving in Congress Fun Again?" American Journal of Political Science 36: 824-28.

19.

Peters, John G. , and Susan Welch. 1980. "The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections." American Political Science Review 74: 697-708.

20.

Ragsdale, Lyn , and Timothy E. Cook . 1987. "Representatives' Actions and Challengers' Reactions: Limits to Candidate Connections in the House." American Journal of Political Science 31: 45-81.