We study the separation of powers between judicial and legislative institutions among the American states. Building upon previous studies, we consider how judicial selection/accountability mechanisms affect the judicial-legislative separation of powers game. We specify game theoretic models that consider these issues. Our formal models demonstrate that judicial elections can empower courts by providing them with direct signals of legitimacy from voters. We then examine the use of judicial review in state supreme courts between 2007 and 2017 both at the institutional and justice level. Our results suggest that electoral institutions empower courts in the separation of powers game, as these institutions are associated with significantly higher odds of invalidating legislative acts compared to unelected courts. Furthermore, we find no evidence that legislative court-curbing efforts constrain judicial independence and argue the time may be ripe to revisit the role court-curbing plays in judicial preemption in American politics.
BerryWilliam D.FordingRichard C.RingquistEvan J.HansonRussell L.KlarnerCarl E.. 2010. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the US States: a Re-Appraisal.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly10: 117–35.
5.
BlackDuncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BlackleyKeith. 2019. “Court Curbing in the State House: Why State Legislators Attack Their Courts.” Justice System Journal40: 269–85.
7.
BonneauChris W.HallMelinda Gann. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. Routledge.
8.
BracePaulBoyeaBrent D. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science52: 360–72.
9.
BracePaul R.HallMelinda Gann. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” The Journal of Politics59: 1206–31.
10.
BracePaulLangerLauraHallMelinda Gann. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” The Journal of Politics62: 387–413.
11.
CaldeiraGregory A.GibsonJames L.. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science36: 635–64.
12.
CameronCharles M.SegalJeffrey A.SongerDonald. 2000. “Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: an Informational Model of the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Decisions.” American Political Science Review94: 101–16.
13.
Canes-WroneBrandiceClarkTom S.KellyJason P.. 2014. “Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions.” American Political Science Review108: 23–39.
14.
Canes-WroneBrandiceClarkTom S.SemetAmy. 2018. “Judicial Elections, Public Opinion, and Decisions on Lower‐Salience Issues.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies15: 672–707.
15.
CannDamon M.WilhelmTeena. 2011. “Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research39: 557–81.
16.
CarrubbaClifford James. 2009. “A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems.” The Journal of Politics71: 55–69.
17.
CatalanoMichael A.2022. “Ex Ante and Ex Post Control over Courts in the US States: Court Curbing and Political Party Influence.” Justice System Journal43: 503–23.
18.
ClarkTom S.2009. “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science53: 971–89.
19.
ClarkTom S.2011. The Limits of Judicial Independence. Cambridge University Press.
20.
DahlRobert A.1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law6: 279–95.
21.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. University of Chicago.
22.
DurrantMatthew. 2026. The State of the Judiciary. Speech Presented at the Utah House of Representatives.
23.
EpsteinLeeKnightJack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. CQ Press.
24.
EskridgeWilliam N.Jr.1991. “Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions.” The Yale Law Journal101: 331–455.
25.
FoxJustinStephensonMatthew C.. 2011. “Judicial Review as a Response to Political Posturing.” American Political Science Review105: 397–414.
26.
GalanterMarc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review9: 95–160.
27.
GelyRafaelSpillerPablo T.. 1990. “A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Cases.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization6: 263–300.
28.
GelyRafaelSpillerPablo T.. 1992. “The Political Economy of Supreme Court Constitutional Decisions: The Case of the Court-Packing Plan.” International Review of Law and Economics12: 45–67.
29.
GeyhCharles Gardner. 2003. “Why Judicial Elections Stink.” Ohio State Law Journal64: 43–79.
30.
GibsonJames L.2007. “The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies4: 507–38.
31.
GibsonJames L.2008. “Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts: Legitimacy Theory and ‘New-Style’ Judicial Campaigns.” American Political Science Review102: 59–75.
32.
GibsonJames L.2009. “‘New-Style’ Judicial Campaigns and the Legitimacy of State High Courts.” The Journal of Politics71: 1285–1304.
33.
GibsonJames L.2013. Electing Judges: The Surprising Effects of Campaigning on Judicial Legitimacy. University of Chicago Press.
34.
GilesMicheal W.BlackstoneBethanyViningRichard L.Jr.. 2008. “The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages Between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision Making.” The Journal of Politics70: 293–306.
35.
HallMelinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” The Journal of Politics49: 1117–24.
36.
HallMelinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Politics54: 427–46.
37.
HallMelinda Gann. 2007. “Voting in State Supreme Court Elections: Competition and Context as Democratic Incentives.” The Journal of Politics69: 1147–59.
38.
HallMatthew.2014. “The Semi-Constrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Fear of Nonimplementation.” American Journal of Political Science58: 352–266.
39.
HallMelinda Gann. 2015. Attacking Judges: How Campaign Advertising Influences State Supreme Court Elections. Stanford Law Books.
40.
HanssenF. Andrew. 2004. “Is There a Politically Optimal Level of Judicial Independence?” The American Economic Review94: 712–29.
41.
HughesDavid A.2019. “New-Style Campaigns in State Supreme Court Retention Elections.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly19: 127–54.
42.
HughesDavid A.WilhelmTeenaWangXuan. 2023. “Updating PAJID Scores for State Supreme Court Justices (1970-2019).” State Politics and Policy Quarterly23: 463–70.
43.
JohnsonGbemende. 2014. “Judicial Deference and Executive Control over Administrative Agencies.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly14: 142–64.
44.
JohnsonGbemende. 2015. “Executive Power and Judicial Deference: Judicial Decision Making on Executive Power Challenges in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly68: 128–41.
45.
KrehbielKeith. 2010. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of US Lawmaking. University of Chicago Press.
46.
KritzerHerbert M.2015. Justices on the Ballot: Continuity and Change in State Supreme Court Elections. Cambridge University Press.
47.
LangerLaura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. University of New York Press.
48.
LangerLauraWilhelmTeena. 2009. “State Supreme Courts as Policymakers: Are they Loved?” In Exploring Judicial Politics, edited by MillerMark C, 110–24. Oxford University Press.
49.
LeonardMeghan E.2014. “Elections and Decision Making on State High Courts: Examining Legitimacy and Judicial Review.” Justice System Journal35: 45–61.
50.
LeonardMeghan E.2016. “State Legislatures, State High Courts, and Judicial Independence: an Examination of Court-Curbing Legislation in the States.” Justice System Journal37: 53–62.
51.
LeonardMeghan E.2022a. “New Data on Court Curbing by State Legislatures.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly22: 483–500.
52.
LeonardMeghan E.2022b. “State Supreme Court Responsiveness to Court Curbing: Examining the Use of Judicial Review.” Justice System Journal43: 486–502.
53.
MarkAlyxZilisMichael A.. 2018. “Restraining the Court: Assessing Accounts of Congressional Attempts to Limit Supreme Court Authority.” Legislative Studies Quarterly43: 141–69.
54.
MaskinEricTiroleJean. 2004. “The Politician and the Judge: Accountability in Government.” The American Economic Review94: 1034–54.
55.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
56.
McGuireKevin TStimsonJames A.. 2004. “The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences.” The Journal of Politics66: 1018–35.
MurphyWalter F.1962. Congress and the Court: A Case Study in the American Political Process. University of Chicago Press.
59.
PeltasonJ. W.1971. 58 Lonely Men: Southern Federal Judges and School Desegregation. University of Illinois Press.
60.
RodgersHarrell R.Jr.BullockCharles S.III. 1976. Coercion to Compliance: Or How Great Expectations in Washington Are Actually Realized at the Local Level, This Being the Saga of School Desegregation in the South as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers—Lessons on Getting Things Done. DC Heath Company.
61.
RogersJames R.2001. “Information and Judicial Review: a Signaling Game of Legislative-Judicial Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science45: 84–99.
62.
RosenbergGerald N.1992. “Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power.” Review of Politics54: 369–98.
63.
RosenbergGerald N.2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?2nd ed.University of Chicago Press.
64.
SegalJeffrey A.1997. “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts.” American Political Science Review91: 28–44.
65.
SegalJeffrey A.WesterlandChadLindquistStefanie A.. 2011. “Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review: Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model.” American Journal of Political Science55: 89–104.
66.
ShepherdJoanna M.2009. “The Influence of Retention Politics on Judges’ Voting.” The Journal of Legal Studies38: 169–206.
67.
SmithSherman. 2022. “Kansas Educators Recall Pain of Brownback Era, Urge Support for Gov. Laura Kelly.” In Kansas Reflector. https://shorturl.at/L2Kzc
68.
SongerDonald R.SegalJeffrey A.CameronCharles M.. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science38: 673–96.
69.
StatonJeffrey K.2006. “Constitutional Review and the Selective Promotion of Case Results.” American Journal of Political Science50: 98–112.
70.
StephensonMatthew C.2003. “‘When the Devil Turns’: the Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review.” The Journal of Legal Studies32: 59–89.
71.
StephensonMatthew C.2004. “Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization20: 379–99.
72.
StrebMatthew J.2007. “The Study of Judicial Elections.” In Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections, edited by StrebMatthew J.. New York University Press.
73.
VanbergGeorg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: a Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science45: 346–61.
74.
VanbergGeorg. 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge University Press.
75.
ViningRichard L.WilhelmTeena. 2023. Administering Justice: Placing the Chief Justice in American State Politics. University of Michigan Press.
76.
WhittingtonKeith E.2005. “‘Interpose Your Friendly Hand’: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review99: 583–96.
77.
WilhelmTeenaViningRichard L.BoldtEthan D.BlackBryan M.. 2020. “Judicial Reform in the American States: The Chief Justice as Political Advocate.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly20: 135–56.
78.
WindettJason H.HardenJeffrey J.HallMatthew E. K.. 2015. “Estimating Dynamic Ideal Points for State Supreme Courts.” Political Analysis23: 461–9.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
