Is the supply of and demand for women candidates heterogeneous for parties across the political spectrum? And if so, what are the implications for this asymmetry for the characteristics of the women candidates we observe? In this paper, I develop an economic theory of candidate selection based on the supply of and demand for female candidates across parties on the left and the right. I examine how differential levels of competition on the left and the right, coupled with informal institutions like attitudes towards gender roles, shape the qualitative characteristics of female candidates. Using data for 11,431 women candidates from 61 elections in 23 Western parliamentary democracies between 2005 and 2021, I test my theoretical expectations on five candidate-level characteristics from the Comparative Candidates Survey. My large-n cross-national study shows that there are qualitative differences between women candidates of the left and women candidates of the right across all five indicators. I explore how the supply of, and demand for female candidates has normative implications for our understanding of women’s representation.
AdamsJ.BrackenD.GidronN.HorneW.O’BrienD. Z.SenkK.. 2023. “Can’t We All Just Get along? How Women Mps Can Ameliorate Affective Polarization in Western Publics.” American Political Science Review117 (1): 318–24.
2.
ArceneauxK.NickersonD. W.. 2009. “Modeling Certainty with Clustered Data: A Comparison of Methods.” Political Analysis17 (2): 177–90.
3.
ArmingeonK.EnglerS.LeemanL.. 2022a. Comparative Political Dataset 1960–2020.
4.
ArmingeonK.EnglerS.LeemanL.. 2022b. Supplement to the Comparative Political Dataset – Government Composition 1960–2020.
5.
BaldezL.2001. “Coalition Politics and the Limits of State Feminism in Chile.” Women & Politics22 (4): 1–28.
6.
BanaszakL. A.PlutzerE.. 1993. “The Social Bases of Feminism in the European Community.” Public Opinion Quarterly57 (1): 29–3.
7.
BarnesT. D.BeaulieuE.. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes and Corruption: How Candidates Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud.” Politics & Gender10 (3): 365–91.
8.
BeckwithK.1985. “Feminism and Leftist Politics in Italy: The Case of Udi-Pci Relations.” West European Politics8 (4): 19–37.
9.
BellB. A.MorganG. B.KromreyJ. D.FerronJ. M.. 2010. “The Impact of Small Cluster Size on Multilevel Models: A Monte Carlo Examination of Two-Level Models with Binary and Continuous Predictors.” JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section1 (1): 4057–67.
10.
Ben-ShitritL.Elad-StrengerJ.Hirsch-HoeflerS.. 2022. “‘Pinkwashing’ the Radical-Right: Gender and the Mainstreaming of Radical-Right Policies and Actions.” European Journal of Political Research61 (1): 86–10.
11.
Bernardez-RodalA.ReyP. R.FrancoY. G.. 2022. “Radical Right Parties and Anti-feminist Speech on Instagram: Vox and the 2019 Spanish General Election.” Party Politics28 (2): 272–83.
12.
BesleyT.FolkeO.PerssonT.RickneJ.. 2017. “Gender Quotas and the Crisis of the Mediocre Man: Theory and Evidence from Sweden.” American Economic Review107 (8): 2204–42.
13.
BolsenT.ThorntonJ. R.. 2014. “Overlapping Confidence Intervals and Null Hypothesis Testing.” The Experimental Political Scientist4 (1): 12–6.
14.
ButlerD. M.PreeceJ. R.. 2016. “Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support.” Political Research Quarterly69 (4): 842–51.
15.
CabezasM.2022. “Silencing Feminism? Gender and the Rise of the Nationalist Rar Right in Spain.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society47 (2): 319–45.
16.
CampbellR.2016. “Representing Women Voters: The Role of the Gender Gap and the Response of Political Parties.” Party Politics22 (5): 587–97.
17.
CaulM.1999. “Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics5 (1): 79–8.
CelisK.ErzeelS.. 2015. “Beyond the Usual Suspects: Non-left, Male and Non-feminist Mps and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Government and Opposition50 (1): 45–4.
22.
CesiC.KeeferP.ScartasciniC.. 2018. Database of Political Institutions 2017(dpi 2017).
23.
ChengC.TavitsM.. 2011. “Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly64 (2): 460–71.
24.
CironeA.CoxG. W.FivaJ. H.. 2021. “Seniority-based Nominations and Political Careers.” American Political Science Review115 (1): 234–51.
25.
ClaytonA.O’BrienD. Z.PiscopoJ. M.. 2019. “All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science63 (1): 113–29.
26.
CrossW.2008. “Democratic Norms and Party Candidate Selection: Taking Contextual Factors into Account.” Party Politics14 (5): 596–69.
27.
CrossW. P.PruysersS.. 2019. “The Local Determinants of Representation: Party Constituency Associations, Candidate Nomination and Gender.” Canadian Journal of Political Science52 (3): 557–74.
28.
de VreeseC. H.2009. “Second-rate Election Campaigning? an Analysis of Campaign Styles in European Parliamentary Elections.” Journal of Political Marketing8 (1): 7–19.
29.
ElderL.2021. The Partisan Gap: Why Democratic Women Get Elected but Republican Women Don’t. New York University Press.
30.
ErzeelS.CelisK.CaluwaertsD.. 2014. “Are Conservatism and Feminism Mutually Exclusive? a Study of ‘feminist Conservative’ Voters in Belgium.” In Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation, edited by CelisK.ChildsS., 273–86. ECPR Press.
31.
FultonS. A.2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly65 (2): 303–14.
32.
FultonS. A.2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-Dynamics and Micro-mechanisms.” Political Behavior36: 605–30.
33.
FultonS. A.DhimaK.. 2021. “The Gendered Politics of Congressional Elections.” Political Behavior43: 1611–37.
34.
FultonS. A.MaestasC. D.MaiselL. S.StoneW. J.. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly59 (2): 235–48.
35.
GieblerH.WüstA. M.. 2011. “Campaigning on an Upper Level? Individual Campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament Elections in its Determinants.” Electoral Studies30 (1): 53–66.
36.
Goodyear-GrantE.2013. “Women Voters, Candidates, and Legislators.” In Parties, Elections, and the Future of Canadian Politics, edited by BittnerA.KoopR., 119–39. UBC Press.
37.
HeidarK.PedersenK.. 2006. “Party Feminism: Gender Gaps within Nordic Political Parties.” Scandinavian Political Studies29 (3): 192–28.
38.
HtunM.PowerT. J.. 2006. “Gender, Parties, and Support for Equal Rights in the Brazilian Congress.” Latin American Politics and Society48 (4): 83–14.
39.
KeithD. J.VergeT.. 2018. “Nonmainstream Left Parties and Women’s Representation in Western Europe.” Party Politics24 (4): 397–409.
40.
KittilsonM. C.2011. “Women, Parties and Platforms in Post-industrial Democracies.” Party Politics17 (1): 66–92.
41.
LawlessJ. L.FoxR. L.. 2010. It Still Takes A Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge University Press.
42.
LehmannP.FranzmannS.BurstT., et al.2023. The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project(mrg/cmp/marpor). version 2023a.
43.
LuhisteM.2015. “Party Gatekeepers’ Support for Viable Female Candidacy in Pr-List Systems.” Politics & Gender11 (1): 89–116.
44.
MatlandR. E.1993. “Institutional Variables Affecting Female Representation in National Legislatures: The Case of Norway.” The Journal of Politics55 (3): 737–55.
45.
MatlandR. E.StudlarD. T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway.” The Journal of Politics58 (3): 707–33.
46.
MendozaS. A.DiMariaM. G.. 2019. “Not “with Her”: How Gendered Political Slogans Affect Conservative Women’s Perceptions of Female Leaders.” Sex Roles80: 1–10.
47.
MeserveS. A.PemsteinD.BernhardW. T.. 2020. “Gender, Incumbency and Party List Nominations.” British Journal of Political Science50 (1): 1–15.
48.
MuriaasR.StavenesT.. 2024. “Gender and Political Seniority: Three Measures.” Politics & Gender20 (2): 271–95.
49.
NorrisP.LovenduskiJ.. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge University Press.
50.
O’BrienD. Z.2018. ““Righting” Conventional Wisdom: Women and Right Parties in Established Democracies.” Politics & Gender14 (1): 27–55.
51.
O’BrienD. Z.PiscopoJ. M.. 2019. “The Impact of Women in Parliament.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Women’s Political Rights, edited by FranceschetS.KrookM. L.TanN., 53–2. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
52.
PaxtonP.KunovichS.HughesM. M.. 2007. “Gender in Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology33 (1): 263–84.
53.
PaytonM. E.GreenstoneM. H.SchenkerN.. 2003. “Overlapping Confidence Intervals or Standard Error Intervals: What Do They Mean in Terms of Statistical Significance?” Journal of Insect Science3 (1): 1–6.
54.
PiscopoJ. M.KennyM.. 2020. “Rethinking the Ambition Gap: Gender and Candidate Emergence in Comparative Perspective.” European Journal of Politics and Gender3 (1): 3–10.
55.
PoguntkeT.ScarrowS. E.WebbP. D., et al.2016. “Party Rules, Party Resources and the Politics of Parliamentary Democracies: How Parties Organize in the 21st Century.” Party Politics22 (6): 661–78.
56.
PoguntkeT.ScarrowS. E.WebbP. D.. 2022. Political Party Database Round 2 V4(first public release).
57.
PrimoD. M.JacobsmeierM. L.MilyoJ.. 2007. “Estimating the Impact of State Policies and Institutions with Mixed-Level Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (4): 446–59.
58.
RahatG.2007. “Candidate Selection: The Choice before the Choice.” Journal of Democracy18 (1): 157–70.
RosenJ.2013. “The Effects of Political Institutions on Women’s Political Representation: A Comparative Analysis of 168 Countries from 1992 to 2010.” Political Research Quarterly66 (2): 306–21.
61.
SaeedA.BalochM. S.RiazH.. 2021. “Global Insights on Tmt Gender Diversity in Controversial Industries: A Legitimacy Perspective.” Journal of Business Ethics179: 1–21.
62.
SantanaA.AguilarS.. 2019. “Bringing Party Ideology Back in: Do Left-Wing Parties Enhance the Share of Women Mps?” Politics & Gender15 (3): 547–71.
63.
StilwellA.UtychS.. 2022. “Gender and Justification in Political Scandal.” American Politics Research50 (1): 131–43.
64.
TeorellJ.SundströmA.HolmbergS., et al.2023. The Quality of Government Dataset, version Jan.23.
65.
ValdiniM. E.2019. The Inclusion Calculation: Why Men Appropriate Women’s Representation. Oxford University Press.
66.
VerlooM.PaternotteD.. 2018. “The Feminist Project under Threat in Europe.” Politics and Governance6 (3): 1–5.
67.
WängnerudL.2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science12 (1): 51–9.
68.
WeeksA. C.MeguidB. M.KittilsonM. C.CofféH.. 2023. “When Do Männerparteien Elect Women? Radical Right Populist Parties and Strategic Descriptive Representation.” American Political Science Review117 (2): 421–38.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
