Political elites play an important role in determining who wins primaries, yet comparatively little is known about which voices in party networks matter when different intra-party signals are sent. We examine this question using an original dataset of Republican Senate and gubernatorial primaries in 2022, an election cycle with substantial intra-party conflict in primary elections. We demonstrate that Fox News appearances (media), Trump’s endorsements (MAGA), campaign fundraising (money), and Twitter engagement (mentions) were all positively associated with vote share. We then assess the state of primary fields prior to Trump’s endorsements, showing that endorsed candidates were outperforming their competitors prior to his involvement. Finally, we consider the state of primary fields after Trump endorsed, demonstrating that his support was associated with a thirteen percentage point increase in both fundraising share and polling which lasted through to the primary. These findings provide clarity on the relative weight of different signals in contested party nominations.
BawnKathleenDeMoraStephanie L.DowdleAndrewHallSpencerMyersMark E.PattersonShawnZallerJohn. 2019. “Policy Voting in U.S. House Primaries.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties29 (4): 533–549.
BernsteinJonathan H.1999. The Expanded Party in American Politics. Berkeley: University of California.
7.
BlumRachel M.2020. How the Tea Party Captured the GOP: Insurgent Factions in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BlumRachel M.CowburnMike. 2024. “How Local Factions Pressure Parties: Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era.” British Journal of Political Science54 (1): 88–109.
9.
BoatrightRobert G.2013. Getting Primaried: The Changing Politics of Congressional Primary Challenges. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
BoatrightRobert G.2014. Congressional Primary Elections. New York: Routledge.
11.
BreauxDavid A.GierzynskiAnthony. 1991. “It’s Money That Matters’: Campaign Expenditures and State Legislative Primaries.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16 (3): 429–443.
CassinoDan. 2016. Fox News and American Politics: How One Channel Shapes American Politics and Society. New York, London: Routledge.
15.
ChenLuWangWenboShethAmit P.. 2012. “Are Twitter Users Equal in Predicting Elections? A Study of User Groups in Predicting 2012 US Republican Presidential Primaries.” In Social Informatics: 4th International Conference, SocInfo 2012, Lausanne, Switzerland, December 5–7, 2012. 4, 379–92. Springer.
CohenMartyKarolDavidNoelHansZallerJohn. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
CowburnMike.Partisan Polarization in Congressional Nominations: How Ideological & Factional Primaries Influence Candidate Positions. Doctoral Thesis. Freie Universität Berlin, 2022.
19.
CowburnMike. 2024. Party Transformation in Congressional Primaries: Faction and Ideology in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
CowburnMikeKnüpferCurd B.. 2024. “The Emerging Fault Line of Alternative News: Intra-Party Division in Republican Representatives’ Media Engagement.” Party Politics30 (2): 319–333.
22.
CowburnMikeSältzerMarius. Partisan Communication in Two-Stage Elections: The Effect of Primaries on Intra-Campaign Positional Shifts in Congressional Elections. Political Science Research and Methods. 2024; 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2023.62
23.
DellaVignaStefanoKaplanEthan. 2007. “The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics122 (3): 1187–1234.
24.
DesmaraisBruce A.La RajaRaymond J.KowalMichael S.. 2015. “The Fates of Challengers in U.S. House Elections: The Role of Extended Party Networks in Supporting Candidates and Shaping Electoral Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science59 (1): 194–211.
25.
DominguezCasey B. K.2011. “Does the Party Matter? Endorsements in Congressional Primaries.” Political Research Quarterly64 (3): 534–44.
FoxRichard L.LawlessJennifer L.. 2005. “To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 642–59.
30.
Gayo-AvelloDaniel. 2012. “‘I Wanted to Predict Elections with Twitter and All I Got Was This Lousy Paper’–A Balanced Survey on Election Prediction Using Twitter Data.” arXiv Preprint arXiv:1204.6441.
31.
Gayo-AvelloDanielMetaxasPanagiotisMustafarajEni. 2011. “Limits of Electoral Predictions Using Twitter.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media5: 490–93.
32.
GelmanAndrewShorBorisBafumiJosephParkDavid. 2007. “Rich State, Poor State, Red State, Blue State: What’s the Matter with Connecticut?” Quarterly Journal of Political Science2: 345–367.
33.
GervaisBryan T.MorrisIrwin L.. 2018. Reactionary Republicanism: How the Tea Party in the House Paved the Way for Trump’s Victory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
HassellHans J. G.2018. The Party’s Primary: Control of Congressional Nominations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
HeseltineMichael. 2023. “Assessing Trump’s Presidential Endorsements While in and Out of Office (2018–2022).” Electoral Studies85: 102661.
38.
HiranoShigeoSnyderJames M.. 2019. Primary Elections in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
HiranoShigeoSnyderJames M.AnsolabehereStephen DanielHansenJohn Mark. 2010. “Primary Elections and Partisan Polarization in the U.S. Congress.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science5 (2): 169–91.
40.
HoeweJenniferBrownellKathryn CramerWiemerEric C.. 2021. “The Role and Impact of Fox News.” In The Forum18: 367–88; De Gruyter.
41.
HyunKi DeukMoonSoo Jung. 2016. “Agenda Setting in the Partisan TV News Context: Attribute Agenda Setting and Polarized Evaluation of Presidential Candidates Among Viewers of NBC, CNN, and Fox News.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly93 (3): 509–29.
42.
JacobsonGary C.1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review83 (3): 773–93.
43.
KalmoeNathan P.MasonLilliana. 2022. Radical American Partisanship: Mapping Violent Hostility, its Causes, and the Consequences for Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
KamarckElaine. 2018. Primary Politics: Everything You Need to Know about How America Nominates its Presidential Candidates. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
45.
KanthakKristinWoonJonathan. 2015. “Women Don’t Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science59 (3): 596–612.
KitchensKarin E.SwersMichele L.. 2016. “Why aren’t There More Republican Women in Congress? Gender, Partisanship, and Fundraising Support in the 2010 and 2012 Elections.” Politics & Gender12 (4): 648–76.
48.
KlumppTilmanPolbornMattias K.. 2006. “Primaries and the New Hampshire Effect.” Journal of Public Economics90 (6–7): 1073–1114.
KochJeffrey W.2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?” The Journal of Politics62 (2): 414–29. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00019
51.
KogerGregoryMasketSethNoelHans. 2009. “Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party Networks.” British Journal of Political Science39 (3): 633–53.
52.
KousserThadLucasScottMasketSethMcGheeEric. Kingmakers or Cheerleaders? Party Power and the Causal Effects of Endorsements. Political Research Quarterly. 2015; 68(3): 443–456. doi:10.1177/1065912915595882
53.
LawlessJennifer L.FoxRichard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ManentoCory. 2019. “Party Crashers: Interest Groups as a Latent Threat to Party Networks in Congressional Primaries.” Party Politics27 (1): 1–12.
56.
ManentoCoryTestaPaul F.. 2021. “Party We Trust? Voter Support for Party-Backed Candidates in Primary Elections.” Political Behavior44: 84.
57.
MasketSeth. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
58.
MasketSeth. 2020. Learning from Loss: The Democrats, 2016–2020. New York: Cambridge University Press.
OwenGuillermoGrofmanBernard. 2006. “Two-Stage Electoral Competition in Two-Party Contests: Persistent Divergence of Party Positions.” Social Choice and Welfare26 (3): 547–69.
SidesJohnTausanovitchChrisVavreckLynnWarshawChristopher. 2020. “On the Representativeness of Primary Electorates.” British Journal of Political Science50 (2): 1–9.
SnyderDan. 2022. “NEW: Former President #Trump Endorses Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford. Trump: ‘Sometimes We Didn’t Exactly Agree on Everything, but We Do Now.’ @OKCFOX #Election2022.” Tweet. Twitter. https://twitter.com/DanSnyderFOX25/status/1574888720108593165
70.
StelterBrian. 2020. Hoax: Donald Trump, Fox News, and the Dangerous Distortion of Truth. New York: Atria/One Signal Publishers.
71.
ThomsenDanielle M.2021. “Competition in Congressional Primaries.” In Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association (MPSA), Chicago (held virtually).
72.
ThomsenDanielle M.2023. “Competition in Congressional Elections: Money versus Votes.” American Political Science Review117 (2): 675–91.
73.
TrumpDonald J.2021. “I Hope to See the Great Governor of South Dakota @KristiNoem, Run against RINO @SenJohnThune, in the Upcoming 2022 Primary. She Would Do a Fantastic Job in the U.S. Senate, but if Not Kristi, Others are Already Lining up. South Dakota Wants Strong Leadership, NOW!” Tweet. Twitter. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1345077337633787905
WareAlan. 2016. “Donald Trump’s Hijacking of the Republican Party in Historical Perspective.” The Political Quarterly87 (3): 406–14.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
