The last decade has given rise to substantial concern about democratic backsliding in the U.S. Manifestations include decreased trust in government, conspiratorial beliefs, contentious protests, and support for political violence. Surprisingly, prior work has not explored how these attitudes and behaviors relate to gun-buying, an action that provides people with the means to challenge the state. We address this topic by focusing on the unprecedented gun-buying surge during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a survey with over 32,000 respondents, we find that—relative to pre-existing gun owners (who did not buy during the pandemic) and the non-gun-owning public—pandemic gun-buyers are more likely to distrust government, believe in conspiracies, protest, and support political violence. These anti-government views and protest behaviors are especially likely among those who bought guns for political reasons. Our findings highlight a crucial dynamic underlying the recent spike in gun sales with consequences for American democracy.
AlmondGabriel AbrahamVerbaSidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
BartelsLarry M.2020. “Ethnic Antagonism Erodes Republicans’ Commitment to Democracy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117 (37): 22752–22759. doi:10.1073/pnas.2007747117.
3.
BartusevičiusHenrikasBorAlexanderJørgensenFrederikPetersenMichael Bang. 2021. “The Psychological Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic Is Associated with Antisystemic Attitudes and Political Violence.” Psychological Science32 (9): 1391–1403. doi:10.1177/09567976211031847.
4.
BellAndrew M.GiftThomas. 2022. “Fraud in Online Surveys: Evidence from a Nonprobability, Subpopulation Sample.” Journal of Experimental Political Science10(1): 148–153. doi:10.1017/XPS.2022.8
5.
BlackDonald. 1983. “Crime as Social Control.” American Sociological Review48 (1): 34–45. doi:10.2307/2095143.
6.
BradyHenry E.KentThomas B.. 2022. “Fifty Years of Declining Confidence & Increasing Polarization in Trust in American Institutions.” Daedalus (Cambridge, Mass.)151 (4): 43–66.
7.
BroockmanDavidKallaJoshuaWestwoodSean. 2022. “Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not.” American Journal of Political Science67(3): 808–828.
8.
ButtrickNicholas. 2020. “Protective Gun Ownership as a Coping Mechanism.” Perspectives on Psychological Science15 (4): 835–855. doi:10.1177/1745691619898847.
9.
CarlsonJennifer. 2023. Merchants of the Right: Gun Sellers and the Crisis of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
CasseseErin C.FarhartChristina E.MillerJoanne M.. 2020. “Gender Differences in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory Beliefs.” Politics & Gender16 (4): 1009–1018. doi:10.1017/S1743923X20000409.
12.
CassidyJ. Warren. 1989. “Here We Stand.” American RiflemanAugust: 7.
13.
ClaytonKatherineDavisNicholas T.PorterEthanRyanTimothy J.WoodThomas J.NyhanBrendan. 2021. “Elite Rhetoric Can Undermine Democratic Norms.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118 (23): e2024125118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2024125118.
14.
CookPhilip J.LudwigJens. 2006. “Aiming for Evidence-Based Gun Policy.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management25 (3): 691–735. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30162752
DiMaggioAnthony R. 2022. “Conspiracy Theories and the Manufacture of Dissent: QAnon, the ‘Big Lie’, Covid-19, and the Rise of Rightwing Propaganda.” Critical Sociology48 (6): 1025–1048. doi:10.1177/08969205211073669.
17.
Druckman JamesN. 2024. “How to Study Democratic Backsliding,” Advances in Political Psychology45: 3–42
18.
DruckmanJames N.KlarSamaraKrupnikovYannaLevenduskyMatthewRyanJohn Barry. 2024. Partisan Hostility and American Democracy: Explaining Political Divide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
DruckmanJames N.OgnyanovaKatherineBaumMatthew A.LazerDavidPerlisRoy H.Della VolpeJohnSantillanaMauricioChweHanyuQuintanaAlexiSimonsonMatthew. 2021. “The Role of Race, Religion, and Partisanship in Misperceptions about COVID-19.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations24: 638–657.
20.
EndersAdamFarhartChristinaMillerJoanneUscinskiJosephSaundersKyleDrochonHugo. 2022a. “Are Republicans and Conservatives More Likely to Believe Conspiracy Theories?” Political Behavior45: 2001–2024. doi:10.1007/s11109-022-09812-3
21.
EndersAdam M.UscinskiJoseph E.KlofstadCasey A.WuchtyStefanSeeligMichelle I.FunchionJohn R.MurthiManohar N.PremaratneKamalStolerJustin. 2022b. “Who Supports QAnon? A Case Study in Political Extremism.” The Journal of Politics84(3): 1844–1849. doi:10.1086/717850
FilindraAlexandraKaplanNoah J.. 2016. “Racial Resentment and Whites’ Gun Policy Preferences in Contemporary America.” Political Behavior38 (2): 255–275. doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9326-4.
24.
FinkelEli J.BailChristopher A.CikaraMinaDittoPeter H.IyengarShantoKlarSamaraMasonLilliana, et al.2020. “Political Sectarianism in America.” Science370 (6516): 533–536. doi:10.1126/science.abe1715.
25.
FisherDana R.AndrewsKenneth T.NealCarenChenowethEricaHeaneyMichael T.LeungTommyPerkinsL. NathanPressmanJeremy. 2019. “The Science of Contemporary Street Protest: New Efforts in the United States.” Science Advances5 (10): eaaw5461. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw5461.
GrahamMatthew H.SvolikMilan W.. 2020. “Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States.” American Political Science Review114 (2): 392–409. doi:10.1017/S0003055420000052.
28.
GrahamMatthew HYairOmer. 2021. “Expressive Responding and Trump’s Big Lie.”
29.
HetheringtonMarc. 2005. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
HetheringtonMarc J.RudolphThomas J.. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Why Washington Won’t Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
IyengarShantoLelkesYphtachLevenduskyMatthewMalhotraNeilWestwoodSean J.. 2019. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science22 (1): 129–146. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034.
32.
JolleyDanielPatersonJenny L.. 2020. “Pylons Ablaze: Examining the Role of 5G COVID-19 Conspiracy Beliefs and Support for Violence.” British Journal of Social Psychology59 (3): 628–640. doi:10.1111/bjso.12394.
33.
JoslynMark R. 2020. The Gun Gap: The Influence of Gun Ownership on Political Behavior and Attitudes: The Influence of Gun Ownership on Political Behavior and Attitudes. 1st ed.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
JoslynMark R.Haider-MarkelDonald P.BaggsMichaelBilboAndrew. 2017. “Emerging Political Identities? Gun Ownership and Voting in Presidential Elections.” Social Science Quarterly98 (2): 382–396. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12421.
35.
KalmoeNathan P.MasonLilliana. 2022. Radical American Partisanship: Mapping Violent Hostility, its Causes, and the Consequences for Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36.
KelsayJames D.PappJordanWarehamJenniferSmithBrad W.. 2018. “In Guns We Trust: A Reexamination of the Collective Security Hypothesis.” Criminal Justice and Behavior45 (12): 1936–1954. doi:10.1177/0093854818793688.
37.
KingzetteJonDruckmanJames NKlarSamaraKrupnikovYannaLevenduskyMatthewRyanJohn Barry. 2021. “How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms.” Public Opinion Quarterly85 (2): 663–677. doi:10.1093/poq/nfab029.
38.
KrekóPéter. 2015. “Conspiracy Theory as Collective Motivated Cognition.” The Psychology of Conspiracy. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
39.
LacombeMatthew J. 2021. Firepower: How the NRA Turned Gun Owners into a Political Force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
LacombeMatthew J.SimonsonMatthew D.GreenJonDruckmanJames N.. 2022. “Social Disruption, Gun Buying, and Anti-system SIBeliefs.” Perspectives on Politics: 1–18. doi:10.1017/S1537592722003322.
41.
LambertyPiaLeiserDavid. 2019. “Sometimes You Just Have to Go in: The Link between Conspiracy Beliefs and Political Action.” Working paper. doi:10.31234/osf.io/bdrxc
42.
LandauMark J.KayAaron C.WhitsonJennifer A.. 2015. “Compensatory Control and the Appeal of a Structured World.” Psychological Bulletin141 (3): 694–722. doi:10.1037/a0038703.
43.
LangBree J.LangMatthew. 2021. “Pandemics, Protests, and Firearms.” American Journal of Health Economics7 (2): 131–163. doi:10.1086/713035.
44.
LehdonvirtaViliOksanenAtteRäsänenPekkaBlankGrant. 2021. “Social Media, Web, and Panel Surveys: Using Non-Probability Samples in Social and Policy Research.” Policy & Internet13 (1): 134–155. doi:10.1002/poi3.238.
LevinssonAnnaMiconiDianaLiZhiyinFrounfelkerRochelle L.RousseauCécile. 2021. “Conspiracy Theories, Psychological Distress, and Sympathy for Violent Radicalization in Young Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18 (15): 7846. doi:10.3390/ijerph18157846.
48.
LewandowskyStephanGignacGilles E.OberauerKlaus. 2013. “The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science.” PloS One8 (10): 630. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075637.
49.
McCartyNolan. 2019. Polarization: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
MernykJoseph S.PinkSophia L.DruckmanJames N.WillerRobb. 2022. “Correcting Inaccurate Metaperceptions Reduces Americans’ Support for Partisan Violence.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119 (16). doi:10.1073/pnas.2116851119.
51.
NewmanDevoraLewandowskyStephanMayoRuth. 2022. “Believing in Nothing and Believing in Everything: The Underlying Cognitive Paradox of Anti-COVID-19 Vaccine Attitudes.” Personality and Individual Differences189 (April): 111522. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111522.
52.
OliverJ. EricWoodThomas J.. 2014. “Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 952–966. doi:10.1111/ajps.12084.
53.
van ProoijenJan-Willem. 2017. “Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories.” Applied Cognitive Psychology31 (1): 50–58. doi:10.1002/acp.3301.
54.
van ProoijenJan-WillemDouglasKaren M. 2017. “Conspiracy Theories as Part of History: The Role of Societal Crisis Situations.” Memory Studies10 (3): 323–333. doi:10.1177/1750698017701615.
55.
van ProoijenJ.-W.2019. “Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Gullibility or Rational Skepticism?” In The Social Psychology of Gullibility, edited by ForgasJ.P.BaumeisterR.F., 319–332. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
56.
RenyTyler T.NewmanBenjamin J.. 2021. “The Opinion-Mobilizing Effect of Social Protest against Police Violence: Evidence from the 2020 George Floyd Protests.” American Political Science Review115 (4): 1499–1507. doi:10.1017/S0003055421000460.
57.
RomerDanielJamiesonKathleen Hall. 2020. “Conspiracy Theories as Barriers to Controlling the Spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.” Social Science & Medicine (1982)263 (October): 113356. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356.
58.
SimonsonMatthew DavidBlockRayJr.DruckmanJames N.OgnyanovaKatherineLazerDavid M. J.. 2024. Black Networks Matter: The Role of Interracial Contact and Social Media in the 2020 Black Lives Matter Protests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SmithDouglas A.UchidaCraig D.. 1988. “The Social Organization of Self-Help: A Study of Defensive Weapon Ownership.” American Sociological Review53 (1): 94–102. doi:10.2307/2095735.
ŠrolJakubBallová MikuškováEvaČavojováVladimíra. 2021. “When We Are Worried, What Are We Thinking? Anxiety, Lack of Control, and Conspiracy Beliefs amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Applied Cognitive Psychology35 (3): 720–729. doi:10.1002/acp.3798.
62.
SterniskoAnniCichockaAleksandraCislakAleksandraVan BavelJay J.. 2021. “National Narcissism Predicts the Belief in and the Dissemination of Conspiracy Theories During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From 56 Countries.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin49: 01461672211054947. doi:10.1177/01461672211054947.
63.
StroebeWolfgangLeanderN. PontusKruglanskiArie W.. 2017. “Is It a Dangerous World Out There? The Motivational Bases of American Gun Ownership.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin43 (8): 1071–1085. doi:10.1177/0146167217703952.
UscinskiJoseph E.EndersAdam M.SeeligMichelle I.KlofstadCasey A.FunchionJohn R.EverettCalebWuchtyStefanPremaratneKamalMurthiManohar N.. 2021. “American Politics in Two Dimensions: Partisan and Ideological Identities versus Anti-Establishment Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science65 (4): 877–895. doi:10.1111/ajps.12616.
VoelkelJan G.ChuJamesStagnaroMichaelMernykJosephRedekoppChrystalPinkSophiaDruckmanJamesRandDavidWillerRobb. 2021. “Interventions Reducing Affective Polarization Do Not Improve Anti-Democratic Attitudes.”. https://osf.io/7evmp/
69.
WarnerTara D.2020. “Fear, Anxiety, and Expectation: Gender Differences in Openness to Future Gun Ownership.” Violence and Gender7 (1): 11–18. doi:10.1089/vio.2019.0025.
70.
WestwoodSean J.GrimmerJustinTylerMatthewClaytonNall. 2022. “Current Research Overstates American Support for Political Violence.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119 (12). doi:10.1073/pnas.2116870119.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
