Descriptive representation is shaped by more than the number of seats group members win—it is also informed by how group members hold on to seats long after election day. Drawing from the literatures on women of color, women, and minorities in politics, this study argues that the relationship between incumbents and descriptive representation is different among groups that hold distinctive political positioning and power. To uncover those differences, the article introduces a new measure called descriptive maintenance, which accounts for a group’s ability to retain descriptive representation in a seat across unique group members and elections. This multidimensional approach expands current conceptualizations by treating incumbency and descriptive representation as interrelated, group-level, phenomena. This framework is tested using nearly 60,000 observations of state elections data in an analysis focused on a group of state legislative incumbents that has rarely been explicitly examined, and yet outnumbers all others: white men.
AbrajanoMarisaHajnalZoltan L.2017. White backlash. New York: Princeton University Press.
2.
AnsolabehereStephenSnyderJames M.Stewart.Charles2001. “Candidate positioning in U.S. house elections.” American Journal of Political Sciencev45, 1: 136–159.
3.
BrownNadia E.2014. Sisters in the statehouse. Black women and legislative decision making. USA: Oxford University Press.
4.
CareyJ MNiemiR G.PowellL WGaryMoncrief. 2006. “The effects of term limits on state legislatures: A new survey of the 50 states.” Legislative Studies Quarterlyv31, 1: 105–134.
5.
CarrollSusan J.1994. Women as candidates in American politics. Indiana University Press.
6.
CarrollSusan JJenkinsKrista. 2001. “Do term limits help women get elected?” Social Science Quarterlyv82, 1: 197–201.
7.
CarrollSusan JSanbonmatsuKira. 2013. More women can run. Gender and pathways to the state legislatures. Oxford University Press.
8.
CasellasJason. The Institutional and Demographic Determinants of Latino Representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly2009; 34(3): 399–426.
9.
ClarkChristopher J.2019. “Explaining black descriptive representation in state legislatures.” In Gaining Voice. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1990. Black feminist thought. Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
11.
CortezDavid.2021. “Latinxs in La Migra: Why they join and why it matters.” Political Research Quarterlyv74, 3: 688–702.
12.
Crowder-MeyerMelodyAdrienneSmithR.2015. “How the strategic context affects women’s emergence and success in local legislative elections.” Politics, Groups and Identitiesv3, 2: 295–317.
13.
DarcyRobert. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. U of Nebraska Press.
14.
EnglishAshleyPearsonKathrynDaraStrolovitchZ.2019. “Who represents me? race, gender, partisan congruence, and representational alternatives in a polarized America.” Political Research Quarterlyv72, 4: 785–804.
15.
FragaBernardL.Gonzalez JuenkeEricShahParu. 2019. “One run leads to another: Minority incumbents and the emergence of lower ticket minority candidates.” The Journal of Politicsv82, 2: 771–775.
16.
FultonS A.2012. “Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and incumbent electoral success.” Political Research Quarterlyv65, 2: 303–314.
17.
FultonSarah ACherieMaestasD.MaiselL SandyWalterStoneJ.2006. “The Sense of a woman: gender, ambition, and the decision to run for congress.” Political Research Quarterlyv59, 2: 235–248.
18.
GarcìaSoniaMartinez-EbersValerieNavarroS. A.CoronadoIrasemaJaramilloPatricia A. 2008. Políticas: Latina Public Officials in Texas. University of Texas Press.
19.
GayClaudine. The Effect of Minority Districts and Minority Representation on Political Participation in California. Public Policy Institute of California, 2001.
20.
HansenEric R. 2022. “White constituents and congressional voting.” American Politics Researchv50, 4: 564–582. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X221087159.
21.
Hardy-FantaCarolPei-te LienPinderhughesDianneSierraChristine Marie. 2016. Contested transformation. Race, gender, and political leadership in 21st century America. Cambridge University Press.
22.
HarrisCheryl. 1993. “Whiteness as property.” Harvard Law Reviewv106, 8: 1707.
23.
HawkesworthMary. 2003. “Congressional enactments of race–gender: toward a theory of raced–gendered institutions.” American Political Science Reviewv97, 04: 529–550.
24.
HawkesworthMaryKleemanKatherine E. 2001 “Term limits and the representation of women.” In Center for American Women and Politics. Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. 24.
25.
HeroR.E.TolbertC J.1995. “Latinos and substantive representation in the US house of representatives: Direct, indirect, or nonexistent?” American Journal of Political Sciencev39: 640.
26.
HeroRodney E.PreuhsRobert R.2006. “Multiculturalism and Welfare Policies in the US States: A state-level comparative analysis.” In Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies, edited by BantingKeithKymlickaWill. Oxford University Press.
27.
HiranoShigeoSnyderJames M.Jr.2009. “Using multimember district elections to estimate the sources of the incumbency advantage.” American Journal of Political Sciencev53, 2: 292–306.
28.
JuenkeEric. Ignorance is Bias: The effect of Latino Losers on Models of Latino Representation. American Journal of Political Science2014; 58(3): 593–603.
29.
KaplanJacob. 2021. United States Governors 1775-2020. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR).
30.
King-MeadowsTysonSchallerThomas. Devolution and Black State Legislators: Challenges and Choices in the 21st Century. Albany, New York: SUNY New York, 2006.
31.
KlarnerCarlBerryWilliamCarseyThomasJewellMalcolmPowellLyndaSnyderJameset al. State Legislative Election Returns (1967-2015). Inter-university Consortium for Political And Social Research2016.
32.
KrookLenaMonaNorrisPippa. 2014. “Beyond quotas: Strategies to promote gender equality in elected office.” Political Studiesv62, 1: 2–20.
33.
LawlessJennifer LFoxRichard L. 2005. It takes a candidate: why women don’t run for office. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
LawlessJennifer L.TheriaultSean M.2005. “Will she stay or will she go? career ceilings and women’s retirement from the U.S. congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterlyv30, 4: 581–96.
35.
LevittSteven D.WolframCatherine D.1997. “Decomposing the sources of incumbency advantage in the U. S. house.” Legislative Studies Quarterlyv22, 1: 45–60.
36.
MansbridgeJ.1999. “Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? a contingent ‘yes.” The Journal of Politicsv61, 03: 628–657.
37.
MendelbergTaliKarpowitzChristopher FGoedertNicholas. 2013. “Does descriptive representation facilitate women’s distinctive voice? how gender composition and decision rules affect deliberation.” American Journal of Political Sciencev58, 2: 291–306.
38.
MoncriefGary F.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.2004. “Time, term limits, and turnover: Trends in membership stability in U.S. state legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterlyv29, 3: 357–381.
39.
MurrayRainbow. 2014. “Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All.” American Political Science Reviewv108, 3: 520–32. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055414000239.
40.
PalmerBarbaraSimonDennis. 2001. “The political glass ceiling.” Women and Politicsv23, 1–2: 59–78.
41.
PalmerBarbaraSimonDennis M.2005. “When women run against women: The hidden influence of female incumbents in elections to the U.S. house of representatives, 1956–2002.” Politics and Genderv1 (1): 39–63.
42.
PhillipsAnne. 1998. The Politics of Presence. Oxford, UK: OUP Oxford. DOI: 10.1093/0198294158.001.0001.
43.
PhillipsChristian Dyogi. 2021. Nowhere to run: Race, gender and immigration in American elections. New York City, NY: Oxford University Press.
44.
PhillipsChristian DyogiShahParuVosslerPatrick. 2022. “Immigrants, intersectionality and the politics of substantive representation.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policyv43, 1: 64–81.
45.
PreuhsRobert R.2007. “Descriptive representation as a mechanism to mitigate policy backlash: Latino incorporation and welfare policy in the American States.” Political Research Quarterlyv60, 2: 277–292.
46.
PreuhsR.R.JuenkeE G. 2011. “Latino U.S. state legislators in the 1990s: Majority-minority districts, minority incorporation, and institutional position.” State Politics and Policy Quarterlyv11, 1: 48–75.
47.
PS: Political Science and Politics. Resisting Marginilization: Black Women’s Political Ambition and Agency. 2020; 53(4).
48.
ReingoldBethHaynieKerry LWidnerKirsten. 2020. Race, gender, and political representation: Toward a more intersectional approach. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2002. “Political parties and the recruitment of women to state legislatures.” The Journal of Politicsv64, 3: 791–809.
50.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2006. “Do parties know that ‘women win’? party leader beliefs about women’s electoral chances.” Politics and Genderv2, 4: 431–450. DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X06060132.
51.
SanbonmatsuKiraCarrollSusanWalshDebbie. 2010. Poised to run: Women’s pathways to state legislatures. Center for American Women and Politics: Eagleton Institute of Politics.
52.
SchneiderMonica C.BosAngela L.2016. “The interplay of candidate party and gender in evaluations of political candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policyv37, 3: 274–294.
ShahParu R.DavisNicholas R.2017. “Comparing Three Methods of Measuring Race/Ethnicity.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politicsv2, 1: 124–139.
55.
ShahParuScottJamilJuenkeEric Gonzalez. 2019. “Women of color candidates: Examining emergence and success in state legislative elections.” Politics, Groups, and Identitiesv7, 2: 429–443.
56.
SquireP. Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited. State Politics & Policy Quarterly2017; 7(2).
57.
SmithRogers M.2008. The “American Creed” and American identity: The limits of liberal citizenship in the United States. The Western Political Quarterlyv41, 2: 225–251.
58.
SmoothWendy G.2006. A case of access denied? gender, race and legislative influence,” women in politics: Seeking office and making policy national symposium series. Berkeley: University of California.
59.
StalsburgBrittanyDitontoTessa M.AndersenDavid J. 2010. Intersectional Stereotypes: How Gender, Race, and Partisan Stereotypes Interact in Evaluations of Political Candidates. APSA.
60.
StoneWalter J.MaiselL. SandyMaestasCherie D.2004. “Quality counts: Extending the strategic politician model of incumbent deterrence.” American Journal of Political Sciencev48, 3: 479–495.
61.
TakashPaule Cruz. 1993. “Breaking barriers to representation: Chicana/Latina elected officials in California.” Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systemsv22, 3/4: 325–360.
62.
TateKatherine. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton University Press, 2003.
63.
TrounstineJessicaMelodyValdini E.2008. “The context matters: The effects of single-member versus at-large districts on city council diversity.” American Journal of Political Sciencev52, 3: 554–569.
64.
WeaverVesla M.2007. “Frontlash: Race and the development of punitive crime policy.” Studies in American Political Developmentv21, 2: 230–265.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
