Gender gaps have been documented in numerous areas of American politics, but one area that has not yet been fully explored is responsiveness, the link between citizen preferences and public policies. Equal responsiveness to the preferences of citizens is a central aspect of democratic representation. This article extends work on income gaps in responsiveness to gender gaps. Specifically, it considers whether women’s preferences are less likely than men’s preferences to be adopted as policy in the US. It uses data on preferences and policy adoptions from 1981 to 2002 created by Gilens. The main finding is a large gender gap in responsiveness. The gap is similar in size to the one between rich and poor, it is particularly large in policies related to the use of force, and it did not narrow over the two decades studied. These results show that inequalities beyond social class deserve significant attention in the study of democratic responsiveness and that aspects of bias against women in politics remain underexplored.
AchenChristopher H.BartelsLarry M.. 2017. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
BartelsLarry M.2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3.
BashirOmar S. 2015. “Testing Inferences About American Politics: A Review of the ‘Oligarchy’ Result.” Research & Politics2 (4).
4.
BernauerJulianGigerNathalieRossetJan. 2015. “Mind the Gap: Do Proportional Electoral Systems Foster a More Equal Representation of Women and Men, Poor and Rich?” International Political Science Review36(1): 78-98.
5.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M.. 2000. “Gender Differences in Pay.” Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 75-99.
6.
BolzendahlCatherine I.MyersDaniel J.. 2004. “Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998.” Social Forces83(2): 759-789.
7.
BowmanJarron. 2020. “Do the Affluent Override Average Americans? Measuring Policy Disagreement and Unequal Influence.” Social Science Quarterly101(3): 1018-1037.
8.
BranhamJ. AlexanderSorokaStuart N.WlezienChristopher. 2017. “When Do the Rich Win?” Political Science Quarterly132(1): 43-62.
9.
BrattonKathleen A.2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender1(1): 97-125.
10.
BrooksDeborah JordanValentinoBenjamin A.. 2011. “A War of One's Own: Understanding the Gender Gap in Support for War.” Public Opinion Quarterly75(2): 270-286.
11.
BurdenBarry C.2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
BurnsNancyLehman SchlozmanKayVerbaSidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13.
CascioElizabeth U.ShenhavNa’ama. 2020. “A Century of the American Woman Voter: Sex Gaps in Political Participation, Preferences, and Partisanship Since Women’s Enfranchisement.” Journal of Economic Perspectives34(2): 24-48.
CelisKaren. 2008. “Representation.” In GoertzGaryMazurAmy, eds. Politics, Gender, and Concepts: Theory and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2022. “Gender Gap Public Opinion.” New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politiccs, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University – New Brunswick. Accessed September 30, 2022.https://cawp.rutgers.edu/gender-gap-public-opinion
17.
ChildsSarahLovenduskiJoni. 2013. “Political Representation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, edited by WaylenGeorginaCelisKarenKantolaJohannaLaurel WeldonS.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
CofféHildeBolzendahlCatherine. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.” Sex Roles62(5-6): 318-333.
19.
Crowder-MeyerMelody. 2022. “How Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Their Intersections Shape Americans’ Issue Priorities.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy43(2): 169-183.
20.
Crowder-MeyerMelody. 2007. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences & Priorities.” Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association.
21.
DahlRobert. 1973. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22.
DinglerSarah C.KroeberCorinnaFortin-RittbergerJessica. 2019. “Do Parliaments Underrepresent Women’s Policy Preferences? Exploring Gender Equality in Policy Congruence in 21 European Democracies.” Journal of European Public Policy26(2): 302-321.
23.
EaglyAlice H.CarliLinda L.. 2012. “Women and the Labyrinth of Leadership.” In Contemporary Issues in Leadership, edited by RosenbachWilliam E.TaylorRobertYoundtMark A.. New York: Westview Press.
24.
EaglyAlice H.DiekmanAmanda B.Johannesen-SchmidtMary C.KoenigAnne M.. 2004. “Gender Gaps in Sociopolitical Attitudes: A Social Psychological Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87(6): 796-816.
25.
ElsässerLeaHenseSvenjaSchäferArmin. 2021. “Not Just Money: Unequal Responsiveness in Egalitarian Democracies.” Journal of European Public Policy28(12): 1890-1908.
26.
EnnsPeter K.2015. “Relative Policy Support and Coincidental Representation.” Perspectives on Politics13(4): 1053-64.
27.
FerlandBenjamin. 2020. “A Gender Gap in Party Congruence and Responsiveness?” Politics & Gender16(1): 174-198.
28.
FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer M., eds. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
FranciaPeter L.GreenJohn C.HerrnsonPaul S.PowellLynda W.WilcoxClyde. The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.
30.
GethinAmoryMartínez-ToledanoClaraPikettyThomas, eds. 2021. Political Cleavages and Social Inequalities, A Study of 50 Democracies, 1948-2020. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31.
GilensMartinPageBenjamin I.. 2014. “Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens.” Perspectives on Politics12(3): 564-581.
32.
GilensMartin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. New York and Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
33.
GilensMartin. 2005. “Inequality and democratic responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly69(5): 778-796.
34.
GriffinJohn D.NewmanBrianWolbrechtChristina. 2012. “A Gender Gap in Policy Representation in the US Congress?” Legislative Studies Quarterly37(1): 35-66.
35.
HackerJacob S.PiersonPaul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
36.
HeerwigJennifer A.GordonKatie M.. 2018. “Buying a Voice: Gendered Contribution Careers among Affluent Political Donors to Federal Elections, 1980–2008.” Sociological Forum33(3): 805-825.
37.
HomolaJonathan. 2019. “Are Parties Equally Responsive to Women and Men?” British Journal of Political Science49(3): 957-975.
38.
InglehartRonaldNorrisPippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender equality and Cultural Change Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
KarpowitzChristopher F.Mendelberg.Tali2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
40.
KellstedtPaul M.PetersonDavid AMRamirezMark D.. 2010. “The Macro Politics of a Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly74(3): 477-498.
41.
KittilsonMiki CaulSchwindt-BayerLeslie A.. 2012. The Gendered Effects of Electoral Institutions: Political Engagement and Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
KochMichael T.FultonSarah A.. 2011. “In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies.” The Journal of Politics73(1): 1-16.
43.
KrcmaricDanielNelsonStephen C.RobertsAndrew. Studying Leaders and Elites: The Personal Biography Approach. Annual Review of Political Science2020; 23: 133–151.
44.
LacombeMatthew. 2021. Firepower: How the NRA Turned Gun Owners into a Political Force. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
45.
LizotteMary-Kate. 2020. Gender Differences in Public Opinion: Values and Political Consequences. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
46.
LottJrJohnR.KennyLawrence W.. 1999. “Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?” Journal of Political Economy107(6): 1163-1198.
47.
MansbridgeJane J.1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
NorranderBarbaraWilcoxClyde. 2008. “The Gender Gap in Ideology.” Political Behavior30(4): 503-523.
49.
PageBenjamin I.BartelsLarry M.Seawright.Jason2013. “Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans.” Perspectives on Politics11(1): 51-73.
50.
PageBenjamin I.GilensMartin. 2017. Democracy in America? What has Gone Wrong and What We Can Do About it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
PageBenjamin I.BoutonMarshall. 2008. The Foreign Policy Disconnect: What Americans Want from Our Leaders but Don’t Get. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
PageBenjamin I.ShapiroRobert Y.. 1992. The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
PaxtonPamela MarieHughesMelanie M.BarnesTiffany. 2020. Women, politics, and power: A global perspective. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
54.
PaxtonPamelaHughesMelanie M.GreenJennifer L.. 2006. “The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, 1893–2003.” American Sociological Review71(6): 898-920.
55.
PhillipsAnne. 1998. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
ReherStefanie. 2018. “Gender and Opinion–Policy Congruence in Europe.” European Political Science Review10(4): 613-635.
57.
SablAndrew. 2015. “The Two Cultures of Democratic Theory: Responsiveness, Democratic Quality, and the Empirical-Normative Divide.” Perspectives on Politics13(2): 345-365.
58.
SchakelWouter. 2021. “Unequal Policy Responsiveness in the Netherlands.” Socio-Economic Review19(1): 37-57.
59.
ShapiroRobert Y.Mahajan.Harpreet1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly50(1): 42-61.
60.
SorokaStuart N.Wlezien.Christopher2008. “On the Limits to Inequality in Representation.” PS: Political Science & Politics41(2): 319-327.
61.
WolbrechtChristinaCorderJ. Kevin. 2020. A Century of Votes for Women: American Elections Since Suffrage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
