The widespread adoption of written constitutions is one of the most notable developments in institutional design in politics over the past 250 years. The American states offer a rich place to study constitutional innovation and imitation as being among the first political bodies to adopt constitutions and also given that they often replaced them, in both cases innovating and learning from one another. In this paper, we use quantitative text analysis to identify constitutional innovation and to investigate patterns of imitation. First, we find substantial textual borrowing between state constitutions. On average, 20 percent of a state’s constitutional language was borrowed directly from another state constitution. Second, states were more likely to borrow text from geographically proximate states, from temporally proximate state constitutions, and from states that shared similar partisan profiles. Finally, we offer a brief discussion of the most influential constitutions as an exploratory example for extending our approach of identifying textual innovation and imitation. These findings offer new contributions to both the study of constitutional design and institutional diffusion.
BaumMarshaFritzChristian G.2000. “American Constitution Making: The Neglected State Constitutional Sources.”Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly27:199–242.
2.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.”American Political Science Review84:395–415.
3.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.1992. “Tax Innovations in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity.”American Journal of Political Science36:715–42.
4.
BranningRosalind L.1960. Pennsylvania Constitutional Development. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
5.
BridgesAmy. 2013. Democratic Beginnings: Founding the Western States. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
6.
DennyMatthew J.SpirlingArthur. 2018. “Text Preprocessing for Unsupervised Learning: Why It Matters, When It Misleads, and What to Do about It.”Political Analysis26 (2): 168–89.
7.
DinanJohn J.2006. The American State Constitutional Tradition. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
8.
DinanJohn J.2018. State Constitutional Politics: Governing by Amendment in the American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
DubinMichael J.2007. Party Affiliations in the State Legislatures: A Year by Year Summary, 1796-2006. Jefferson: McFarland.
10.
ElkinsZachary. 2010. “Diffusion and the Constitutionalization of Europe.”Comparative Political Studies43:969–99.
11.
ElkinsZacharyGinsburgTomMeltonJames. 2009. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
EpsteinLeeKnightJack. 2003. “Constitutional Borrowing and Nonborrowing.”International Journal of Constitutional Law1:196–223.
13.
FritzChristian G.1994. “The American Constitutional Tradition Revisited: Preliminary Observations on State Constitution-Making in the Nineteenth-Century West.”Rutgers Law Journal25:945–98.
14.
FritzChristian G.2002. “Recovering the Lost World of America’s Written Constitutions.”Albany Law Review68:261–93.
15.
GardnerJames A.2014. “Autonomy and Isomorphism: The Unfulfilled Promise of Structural Autonomy in American State Constitutions.”Wayne Law Review60:31–67.
16.
GilardiFabrizio. 2010. “Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?”American Journal of Political Science54:650–66.
17.
GoderisBenediktVersteegMila. 2013. “Transnational Constitutionalism: A Conceptual Framework.” In Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, edited by GalliganDenis J.VersteegMila, 103–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
GrahamErin R.ShipanCharles R.VoldenCraig. 2013. “The Diffusion of Diffusion Research in Political Science.”British Journal of Political Science43:673–701.
19.
GrayVirginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.”American Political Science Review67:1174–85.
20.
GreenFletcher M.1930. Constitutional Development in the South Atlantic State, 1776-1860: A Study in the Evolution of Democracy. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
21.
HardinRussell. 1989. “Why a Constitution?” In The “Federalist Papers” and the New Institutionalism, edited by GrofmanBernardWittmanDonald, 100–20. New York: Agathon Press.
22.
HardinRussell. 2013. “Why a Constitution?” In Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, edited by GalliganDenis J.VersteegMila, 510–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
HerronPaul E.2017. Framing the Solid South: The State Constitutional Conventions of Secession, Reconstruction, and Redemption, 1860-1902. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
24.
HinkleRachael K.2015. “Into the Words: Using Statutory Text to Explore the Impact of Federal Courts on State Policy Diffusion.”American Journal of Political Science59:1002–21.
25.
HirschlRan. 2013. “The Strategic Foundations of Constitutions.” In Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, edited by GalliganDenis J.VersteegMila, 157–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
JansaJoshua M.HansenEric R.GrayVirginia H.2018. “Copy and Paste Lawmaking: Legislative Professionalism and Policy Reinvention in the States.”American Politics Research47:739–67.
27.
KanazawaMark T.NollRoger G.1994. “The Origins of State Railroad Regulation: The Illinois Constitution of 1870.” In The Regulated Economy: A Historical Approach to Political Economy, edited by GoldinClaudiaLibecapGary D., 13–54. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
LinderFridolinDesmaraisBruceBurgessMatthewGiraudyEugenia. 2020. “Text as Policy: Measuring Policy Similarity through Bill Text Reuse.”Policy Studies Journal48:546–74. doi:10.1111/psj.12257.
29.
LutzDonald S. 1998a. Colonial Origins of the American Constitution. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
30.
LutzDonald S.1988b. The Origins of American Constitutionalism. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
31.
LutzDonald S.2006. Principles of Constitutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
NorthDouglass C.WeingastBarry R.1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.”The Journal of Economic History49:803–32.
33.
PaineThomas. (1791) 1984. The Rights of Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
34.
ShipanCharles R.VoldenCraig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Anti-smoking Policies from US Cities to States.”American Journal of Political Science50:825–43.
35.
ShipanCharles R.VoldenCraig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.”American Journal of Political Science52:840–57.
36.
SilgeJuliaRobinsonDavid. 2017. Text Mining with R: A Tidy Approach. 1st ed. Beijing: O’Reilly Media.
37.
StoryJoseph. (1833) 1987. Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
38.
StourzhGerald. 1988. “Constitution: Changing Meanings of the Term from the Early Seventeenth to the Late Eighteenth Century.” In Conceptual Change and the Constitution, edited by BallTerencePocockJ. G. A., 35–54. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
39.
TarrG. Alan. 1998. Understanding State Constitutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
40.
VersteegMilaZackinEmily. 2014. “American Constitutional Exceptionalism Revisited.”The University of Chicago Law Review81:1641–707.
41.
VersteegMilaZackinEmily. 2016. “Constitutions Unentrenched: Toward an Alternative Theory of Constitutional Design.”American Political Science Review110:657–74.
42.
VoldenCraig. 2006. “States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program.”American Journal of Political Science50:294–312.
43.
WalkerJack L.1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.”American Political Science Review63:880–99.
44.
WilkersonJohnSmithDavidStampNicholas. 2015. “Tracing the Flow of Ideas in Legislatures: A Text Reuse Approach.”American Journal of Political Science59:943–56.
45.
WilliamsRobert F.2009. The Law of American State Constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
WoodGordon S.1969. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776-1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
47.
ZackinEmily. 2013. Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places: Why State Constitutions Contain America’s Positive Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
48.
ZinkJames R.2009. “The Language of Liberty and Law: James Wilson on America’s Written Constitution.”American Political Science Review103:442–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
