Do politicians represent the policy preferences of men and women equally post-war? Gender inclusiveness has particularly high stakes in this context: research shows that it can help sustain peace. We use a series of survey experiments with politicians (N = 1389) and voters (N = 3049) to study gender bias in policy representation in a post-conflict setting: Bosnia. We find a significant pro-male bias in the policy responsiveness of local politicians (both men and women) to their constituency preferences. We do not find evidence that this is because men are more active and vocal about expressing their policy preferences. Instead, this bias is present in the post-war society more generally: politicians’ attitudes reflect the pro-male bias among voters, both men and women. These results have important implications for the study of gender and post-conflict politics.
AdamsJamesEzrowLawrence. 2009. “Who do European Parties Represent? How Western European Parties Represent the Policy Preferences of Opinion Leaders.” Journal of Politics71 (1): 206‐223.
2.
AntićMiliga G.Lokar.Sonja2006. “The Balkans: From Total Rejection to Gradual Acceptance of Gender Quotas.” In Women, Quotas and Politics, edited by DahlerupDrude, 138‐167. New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BalcellsLaia. 2012. “The Consequences of Victimization on Political Identities: Evidence from Spain.” Politics and Society40 (3): 311‐347.
4.
BarnesTiffany D.O’Brien.Diana2018. “Defending the Realm: The Appointment of Female Defense Ministers Worldwide.” American Journal of Political Science62 (2), 355‐368.
5.
BarnesTiffany D.BurchardStephanie M.. 2013. “‘Engendering’ Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Political Studies46 (7): 767‐790.
6.
BartelsLarry. 2016. Unequal Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7.
BesleyTimothyCoateStephen. 1997. “An Economic Model of Representative Democracy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics112 (1): 85‐114.
8.
BlauFrancineKahnLawrence. 2017. “The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Sources.” Journal of Economic Literature. 55 (3): 789‐865.
9.
BrattonKathleen A.2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics and Gender1 (1): 97‐125.
10.
BrolloFernandaTroianoUgo. 2016. “What Happens When a Woman Wins an Election? Evidence from Close Races in Brazil.” Journal of Development Economics122: 28‐45.
11.
BroockmanDavid E.2013. “Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science57 (3): 521‐536.
12.
BurnsNancySchlozmanKay L.VerbaSidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13.
ButlerDaniel M.BroockmanDavid E.. 2011. “Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 463‐477.
14.
CampbellRosieChildsSarahLovenduskiJoni. 2010. “Do Women Need Womn Representatives?” British Journal of Political Science40 (1): 171‐194.
15.
CaprioliMaryBoyerMark A.. 2001. “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (4): 503‐518.
ChattopadhyayRaghabendraDufloEsther. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica72 (5): 1409‐43.
18.
ClaytonAmandaJosefssonCeciliaMattesRobertMozafferShaheen. 2019. “In Whose Interest? Gender and Mass–Elite Priority Congruence in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Political Studies52 (1): 69‐101.
19.
CostaMia. 2017. “How Responsive Are Political Elites? A Meta-Analysis of Experiments on Public Officials.” Journal of Experimental Political Science4 (3): 241‐254.
20.
DemerittJacqueline H. R.NicholsAngela D.Kelly.Eliza G.2015. “Female Participation and Civil War Relapse.” Civil Wars16 (3): 346‐368.
21.
EnnsPeter K.WlezienChristopher. 2011. Who Gets Represented?New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
FordLynne. 2006. Women and Politics: The Pursuit of Equality. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
23.
FranceschetSusanPiscopoJennifer M.. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender4 (3): 393‐425.
24.
GadarianShana Kushner. 2010. “Foreign Policy at the Ballot Box: How Citizens Use Foreign Policy to Judge and Choose Candidates.” Journal of Politics72 (4): 1046‐1062.
25.
GetmanskyAnnaZeitzoffThomas. 2014. “Terrorism and Voting: The Effect of Rocket Threat on Voting in Israeli Elections.” American Political Science Review108 (3): 588‐604.
26.
GilensMartin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27.
GizelisTheodora-Ismene. 2009. “Gender Empowerment and United Nations Peacebuilding.” Journal of Peace Research46 (4): 505‐523.
28.
GoldinClaudia. 1991. “The Role of World War II in the Rise of Women’s Employment.” American Economic Review81 (4): 741‐756.
GriffinJohn D.NewmanBrianWolbrechtChristina. 2012. “A Gender Gap in Policy Representation in the U.S. Congress?” Legislative Studies Quarterly37 (1): 35‐66.
31.
HadzicDinoTavitsMargit. 2019. “The Gendered Effects of Violence on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics81 (2): 676‐680.
32.
Hadzic, Dino and Margit Tavits. 2020. “Wartime Violence and Post-War Women's Representation.” British Journal of Political Science 51(3): 1024–1039.
33.
HeinzJohn P.LaumannEdward O.NelsonRobert L.SalisburyRobert H.. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
34.
HolmanMyria R.MerollaJennifer L.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.. 2011. “Sex, Stereotypes, and Security: A Study of the Effects of Terrorist Threat on Assessments of Female Leadership.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy32: 173‐192.
35.
HomolaJonathan. 2019. “Are Parties Equally Responsive to Women and Men?” British Journal of Political Science49 (3): 957‐75.
36.
HtunMalaWeldonS. Laurel. 2012. “The Civic Origins of Progressive Policy Change: Combating Violence against Women in Global Perspective, 1975-2005.” American Political Science Review106 (03): 548‐569.
37.
HudsonValerieCaprioliMaryBalli-SpanvillBonnieMcDermottRoseEmmettChad. 2009. “The Heart of the Matter: The Security of Women and the Security of States.” International Security33 (3): 7‐45.
38.
JelenTed G.ThomasSueWilcoxClyde. 1994. “The Gender Gap in Comparative Perspective: Gender Differences in Abstract Ideology and Concrete Issues in Western Europe.” European Journal of Political Research25: 171‐186.
39.
JokayCharles. 2001. “Local government in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In Stabilization of Local Governments. edited by KandevaE.. 89‐140.
40.
KellstedtPaul M.PetersonDavid A.M.RamirezMark D.. 2010. “The Macro Politics of a Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly74 (3): 477‐498.
41.
KimSangEunMichelitchKristin. 2019. “Bridge over Troubled Water: Same-Gender Substantive Representation in 49 Subnational Ugandan Governments.” CSDI Working Paper 1-2019. Vanderbilt University.
42.
KochMichaelFultonSarah. 2011. “In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding and National Security Policy in Established Democracies.” Journal of Politics73 (1): 1‐16.
43.
KrookMona Lena. 2016. “Contesting Gender Quotas: Dynamics of Resistance.” Politics, Groups, and Identities4 (2): 268‐283.
44.
LawlessJennifer L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly57 (3): 479‐490.
45.
LlorenAnouk. 2015. “Women’s substantive representation: Defending feminist interests and women’s electoral preferences.” Journal of Legislative Studies21 (2): 144‐167.
46.
LupuNoamPeisakhinLeonid. 2017. “The Legacy of Political Violence across Generations.” American Journal of Political Science61 (4): 836‐851.
47.
MansbridgeJane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics61 (3): 628‐657.
48.
MelanderErik. 2005. “Political Gender Equality and State Human Rights Abuse.” Journal of Peace Research42 (2): 149‐166.
49.
MerollaJenniferZechmeisterElizabeth J.. 2009. Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
MironovaVeraWhittSam. 2016. “The Evolution of Prosociality and Parochialism After Violence.” Journal of Peace Research53 (5): 648‐64.
51.
O’BrienDiana Z.Rickne.Johanna2016. “Gender Quotas and Women’s Political Leadership.” American Political Science Review110 (1): 112‐26.
52.
OsbornTracy L.2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender and Representation in the State Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
OsborneMartin J.SlivinskiAl. 1996. “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics111 (1): 65‐96.
54.
PaxtonPamelaHughesMelanie M.BarnesTiffany D.. 2020. Women, Politics, and Power: A Global Perspective, 4th ed.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
55.
PhillipsAnne. 1995. The Politics of Presence.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
RozenasArturasSchutteSebastianZhukovYuri. 2017. “The Political Legacy of Violence: The Long-Term Impact of Stalin’s Repression in Ukraine.” Journal of Politics79 (4): 1147‐1161.
57.
SambanisNicholas. 2001. “Do Ethnic and Nonethnic Civil Wars Have the Same Causes? A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry (Part 1).” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (3): 259‐282.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 570‐585.
60.
SeltzerRichard A.NewmanJodyVoorhees LeightonMelissa. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder: Lynne Rynner.
61.
Shair-RosenfieldSarahWoodReed M.. 2017. “Governing Well after War: How Improving Female Representation Prolongs Post-Conflict Peace.” Journal of Politics79 (3): 995‐1009.
62.
SwersMichele. 2005. “Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation: An Analysis of Sex Differences in Cosponsorship Activity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly30 (3): 407‐32.
63.
Taylor-RobinsonMichelle M.HeathRoseanna Michelle. 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities than Their Male Colleagues?” Women & Politics24 (4): 77‐101.
64.
TrippAili Mari. 2015. Women and Power in Postconflict Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65.
United Nations. 2016. “Bosnia and Herzegovina making progress towards gender equality, women’s anti-discrimination committee told, as it concludes review of report.” http://www.un.org/press/en/2006/wom1557.doc.htm
66.
VegaArturoFirestoneJuanita M.. 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly20 (2): 213‐22.
67.
WängnerudLena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science12: 51‐69.
68.
WoodElisabeth Jean. 2008. “The Social Processes of Civil War: The Wartime Transformation of Social Networks.” Annual Review of Political Science11 (1): 539‐561.
69.
ZaharijevićAdriana, ed. 2012. Neko Je Rekao Feminizam: Kako Je Feminizam Uticao Na Žene XXI Veka. Sarajevo: Sarajevo Open Center.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
