How do quotas for women in Sri Lanka’s local government institutions affect key governance indicators such as perceived fairness, institutional trust, and perceived performance? These dimensions of governance are underexplored in the context of gender quota policies in patriarchal societies like that of Sri Lanka. The study hypothetically varied the quota provision for women (decrease to 10%, increase to 45%, or keep at the current 25%) in local government, and then tried to understand people’s opinions about the three governance indicators. When examining the results of the experiment (around 1,200 samples), it was found that perceived fairness, institutional trust, and perceived performance increased along with the greater quota provision. Possible mechanisms for the increases in institutional trust and perceived performance may be associated with the signal of fairness generated by the increase of quota provision for women.
AdamsRenée B.FerreiraDaniel. 2009. “Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics94 (2): 291–309.
2.
AhernKenneth R.DittmarAmy K. 2012. “The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics127 (1): 137–97.
3.
AlexanderAmy C.JalalzaiFarida. 2020. “Symbolic Empowerment and Female Heads of States and Government: A Global, Multilevel Analysis.” Politics, Groups, and Identities8 (1): 24–43.
4.
AlexanderDeborahAndersenKristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly46 (3): 527–45.
5.
BaldezLisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly29 (2): 231–58.
6.
BaniaminHasan Muhammad. 2019. “Linking Socio-Economic Performance, Quality of Governance, and Trust in the Civil Service: Does Culture Intercede in the Perceived Relationships? Evidence from and beyond Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration41 (3): 127–41.
7.
BaniaminHasan MuhammadJamilIshtiaqAskvikSteinar. 2020. “Mismatch between Lower Performance and Higher Trust in the Civil Service: Can Culture Provide an Explanation?”International Political Science Review41 (2): 192–206.
8.
BarnesTiffany D.BeaulieuEmily. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes and Corruption: How Candidates Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud.” Politics & Gender10 (3): 365–91.
9.
BarnesTiffany D.BurchardStephanie M. 2012. “‘Engendering’ Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Political Studies46 (7): 767–90.
10.
BauhrMonikaCharronNicholas. 2020. “Will Women Executives Reduce Corruption? Marginalization and Network Inclusion.” Comparative Political Studies. Published electronically December 2. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0010414020970218
11.
BulathgeDisna Priyangika. 2011. “An Analysis of Women’s Representation in Local Government Councils in Sri Lanka.” Unpublished thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
12.
BushSarah Sunn. 2011. “International Politics and the Spread of Quotas for Women in Legislatures.” International Organization65 (1): 103–37.
13.
ClarkMorgan. 2015. “Gender Quotas: A Path to Women’s Empowerment?”Vanderbilt Undergraduate Research Journal10:1–8.
14.
Clots-FiguerasIrma. 2011. “Women in Politics: Evidence from the Indian States.” Journal of Public Economics95 (7–8): 664–90.
CowleyPhilip. 2014. “Descriptive Representation and Political Trust: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Utilising Ignorance.” The Journal of Legislative Studies20 (4): 573–87.
17.
DahlerupDrude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies11 (4): 275–98.
HillmanBen. 2018. “The Limits of Gender Quotas: Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Indonesia.” Journal of Contemporary Asia48 (2): 322–38.
23.
HinojosaMagdaFridkinKim L.KittilsonMiki Caul. 2017. “The Impact of Descriptive Representation on ‘Persistent’ Gender Gaps: Political Engagement and Political Trust in Uruguay.” Politics, Groups, and Identities5 (3): 435–53.
24.
HofstedeGeert H.HofstedeGert JanMinkovMichael. 2005. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (vol. 2). New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
25.
HtunMalaLacalleMarinaMicozziJuan Pablo. 2013. “Does Women’s Presence Change Legislative Behavior? Evidence from Argentina, 1983–2007.” Journal of Politics in Latin America5 (1): 95–125.
26.
HuangJiekunKisgenDarren J. 2013. “Gender and Corporate Finance: Are Male Executives Overconfident Relative to Female Executives?”Journal of Financial Economics108 (3): 822–39.
27.
InglehartRonaldBakerWayne E. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review65 (1): 19–51.
IyerLakshmiManiAnandiMishraPrachiTopalovaPetia. 2012. “The Power of Political Voice: Women’s Political Representation and Crime in India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics4 (4): 165–93.
30.
JamilIshtiaqAminuzzamanSalahuddin M.KabirSyeda LasnaHaqueM. Mahfuzul. 2020. “Introduction: Gender Mainstreaming in Politics, Administration, and Development in South Asia.” In Jamilet al. eds., Gender Mainstreaming in Politics, Administration and Development in South Asia, 1–17. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
KittilsonMiki Caul. 2005. “In Support of Gender Quotas: Setting New Standards, Bringing Visible Gains.” Politics & Gender1 (4): 638–54.
32.
KrishnamohanThanabalasingam. 2016. “The Local Government System in Indonesia and Sri Lanka: A Comparative Overview.” International Journal in Commerce, IT & Social Sciences3 (12): 8–12.
33.
KudvaNeema. 2003. “Engineering Elections: The Experiences of Women in Panchayati Raj in Karnataka, India.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society16 (3): 445–63.
34.
LiuShan-Jan Sarah. 2018. “Are Female Political Leaders Role Models? Lessons from Asia.” Political Research Quarterly71 (2): 255–69.
LiyanageKamala. 2018. “Testing the Politics of Presence: Women’s Representation in Local Government in Sri Lanka.” In Women in Governing Institutions in South Asia, edited by AhmedN., pp. 305–21. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
LlorenAnouk. 2014. “Gender Quotas in Morocco: Lessons for Women’s Descriptive and Symbolic Representation.” Representation50 (4): 527–38.
38.
MansbridgeJane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” The Journal of Politics61 (3): 628–57.
39.
MeierPetra. 2000. “From Theory to Practice and Back Again: Gender Quotas and the Politics of Presence in Belgium.” In Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation, and Association, edited by SawardMichael, 106–16. London: Routledge.
40.
MeierPetra. 2008. “A Gender Gap Not Closed by Quotas: The Renegotiation of the Public Sphere.” International Feminist Journal of Politics10 (3): 329–47.
41.
NorrisPippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
NyeJoseph S.Jr.1997. “In Government We Don’t Trust.” Foreign Policy108:99–111.
43.
PhumessawatdiPerada. 2020. “Policy Movement through the Lens of Postcolonial Feminism, Policy Transfer, and Policy Translation: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming in Thailand.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Bristol. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.801603.
44.
PiersonPaul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics45:595–628.
45.
RameezAboobacker. 2018. “Political Participation of Women in Local Governance: A Case Study of Selected Local Government Bodies in Eastern Sri Lanka.” Journal of Asian and African Studies53 (7): 1043–61.
46.
RothsteinBo. 2009. “Creating Political Legitimacy: Electoral Democracy Versus Quality of Government.” American Behavioral Scientist53 (3): 311–30.
47.
RothsteinBoTeorellJan A. N. 2008. “What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions.” Governance21 (2): 165–90.
48.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A.MishlerWilliam. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation.” The Journal of Politics67 (2): 407–28.
49.
SwersMichele L.1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues?.” Legislative Studies Quarterly23 (3): 435–48.
50.
TanNetina. 2014. “Ethnic Quotas and Unintended Effects on Women’s Political Representation in Singapore.” International Political Science Review35 (1): 27–40.
Van RyzinGregg G.2011. “Outcomes, Process, and Trust of Civil Servants.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory21 (4): 745–60.
53.
VergeTàniaEspírito-SantoAnaWiesehomeierNina. 2015. “The Symbolic Impact of Women’s Representation on Citizens’ Political Attitudes: Measuring the Effect through Survey Experiments.” Paper presented at the 4th European Conference on Politics and Gender, Uppsala, June 11–14.
WangZhengxuYouYu. 2016. “The Arrival of Critical Citizens: Decline of Political Trust and Shifting Public Priorities in China.” International Review of Sociology26 (1): 1–20.
56.
WängnerudLena. 2012. “Why Women Are Less Corrupt than Men”. In HolmbergSctrenRothsteinBo, eds., Good Government: The Relevance of Political Science, pp. 212–232. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
57.
ZetterbergPär. 2009. “Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement? Lessons from Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly62 (4): 715–30.
58.
ZhaoDahaiHuWei. 2015. “Determinants of Public Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence from Urban China.” International Review of Administrative Sciences83 (2): 358–77.va
