Anger is a common feature in contemporary American politics. Through the process of affect linkage, we argue that one way the electorate becomes angrier about politics is by observing angry displays from political elites. Affect linkage occurs when a person’s emotional state of mind changes to match the emotions displayed by someone else. Using an online experiment in which subjects are randomly exposed to an angry or unemotional debate between a Democrat and Republican running for Congress, we show that exposure to an angry in-party politician significantly increases the amount of anger, disgust, and outrage expressed by co-rank-and-file partisans. This increase in aversive emotions, moreover, increases the likelihood that citizens report the intention to vote, and this affect linkage effect is most pronounced in those who are most likely to stay home on election day: the weakest partisans. Interestingly, angry rhetoric by political elites does not have any effect on out-partisans, suggesting that anger via emotional contagion does not cross party lines.
AbramowitzAlan I.WebsterSteven W.2018. “Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties but Behave like Rabid Partisans.”Advances in Political Psychology39:119–35.
2.
AchenChristopher H.BartelsLarry M.2017. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Ggovernment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
BraderTedMarcusGeorge E.2013. “Emotion and Political Psychology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by HuddyLeonieSearsDavid O.LevyJack S., 165–203. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BucyErik P.GrabeMaria E.2009. “Happy Warriors Revisited: Hedonic and Agonic Display Repertoires of Presidential Candidates on the Evening News.”Politics and the Life Sciences27 (1): 78–98.
6.
CampbellAngusConversePhilipMillerWarren E.StokesDonald F.1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
CarverCharles S.Harmon-JonesEddie. 2009. “Anger Is an Approach Related Affect: Evidence and Implications.”Psychological Bulletin135 (2): 183–204.
8.
CombsDavid J. Y.PowellCaitlin A. J.SchurtzDavid RyanSmithRichard H.2009. “Politics, Schadenfreude, and Ingroup Identification: The Sometimes Happy Thing about a Poor Economy and Death.”Journal of Experimental Psychology45 (4): 635–46.
9.
CrabtreeCharlesGolderMattGschwendThomasIndridasonIndridi. 2020. “It’s Not Only What You Say, It’s Also How You Say It: The Strategic Use of Campaign Sentiment.”Journal of Politics82 (3): 1044–60.
10.
De CastellaKristaMcGartyCraig. 2011. “Two Leaders, Two Wars: A Psychological Analysis of Fear and Anger Content in Political Rhetoric about Terrorism.”Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy11 (1): 180–200.
11.
ElfenbeinHillary A.2014. “The Many Face of Emotional Contagion: An Affective Process Theory of Affective Linkage.”Organizational Psychology Review4 (4): 326–62.
12.
EndersAdam M.LuptonRobert N.2020. “Value Extremity Contributes to Affective Polarization in the US.”Political Science Research and Methods, 1–10. doi:10.1017/psrm.2020.27.
13.
FanRuiZhaoJichangChenYanXuKe. 2014. “Anger Is More Influential than Joy: Sentiment Correlation in Weibo.”PLoS ONE9 (10): e110184.
14.
GeerJohn G.2012. “The News Media and the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns.”PS: Political Science & Politics45 (3): 422–27.
15.
GervaisBryan T.2016. “More than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility.”International Journal of Public Opinion29 (3): 384–405.
16.
HatfieldElaineCacioppoJohn T.RapsonRichard L.1993. “Emotional Contagion.”Current Direction in Psychological Science2 (3): 96–100.
17.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyCasseseErin. 2007. “On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger.” In The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, edited by NeumanW. RussellMarcusGeorge E.CriglerAnnMacKuenMichael, 202–30. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
HuddyLeonieMasonLillianaAaroeLene. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion and Partisan Identity.”American Political Science Review109:1–17.
19.
ImaiKosukeKeeleLukeTingleyDustin. 2010. “A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis.”Psychological Methods15 (4): 309–34.
20.
ImaiKosukeKeeleLukeTingleyDustinYamamotoTeppei. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.”American Political Science Review150 (4): 765–89.
21.
IyengarShantoKinderDonald P.2010. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Updated ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
IyengarShantoSoodGauravLelkesYphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.”Public Opinion Quarterly76 (3): 405–31.
23.
IyengarShantoWestwoodSean J.2015. “Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.”American Journal of Political Science59 (3): 690–707.
24.
KeltnerDachaHaidtJonathan. 1999. “Social Function of Emotions at Four Levels.”Cognition and Emotion13 (5): 505–21.
KennyDavid A.KashyDeborah A.BolgerNiall. 1998. “Data Analysis in Social Psychology.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by GilbertDaniel ToddFiskeSusan T.LindzeyGardner, 233–65. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
LakinJessica L.JefferisValerie E.ChengClara Michelle. 2003. “The Chameleon Effect as Social Glue: Evidence for the Evolutionary Significance of Nonconscious Mimicry.”Journal of Nonverbal Behavior27 (3): 145–62.
28.
LenzGabriel S.2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
LernerJennifer S.TiedensLarissa Z.2006. “Portrait of the Angry Decision Maker: How Appraisal Tendencies Shape Anger’s Influence on Cognition.”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making19 (2): 115–37.
30.
LevenduskyMatthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals became Democrats and Conservatives became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
LodgeMiltonTaberCharles S.2005. “The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis.”Political Psychology26 (3): 455–82.
32.
LodgeMiltonTaberCharles S.2013. The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MacKuenMichaelWolakJenniferKeeleLukeMarcusGeorge. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship and Reflective Deliberation.”American Journal of Political Science54 (2): 440–58.
34.
MarshAbigailAmbadyNaliniKleckRobert. 2005. “The Effects of Fear and Anger Facial Expressions on Approach and Avoidance Related Behaviors.”Emotion5 (1): 1–19.
35.
MasonLilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Behavioral and Issue Polarization.”American Journal of Political Science59 (1): 1–18.
36.
MasonLilliana. 2016. “A Cross-Cutting Calm: How Social Sorting Drives Affective Polarization.”Public Opinion Quarterly80 (1): 351–77.
37.
MasonLilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
MattesKyleRosemanIra J.RedlawskDavid P.KatzSteven Katz. 2018. “Contempt and Anger in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” In Conventional Wisdom, Parties, and Broken Barriers in the 2016 Election, edited by LucasJennifer C.GaldieriChristopher J.SiscoTauna S., 101–14. Lanham: Lexington Books.
39.
MullinixKevin J.LeeperThomas J.DruckmanJames N.FreeseJeremy. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.”Journal of Experimental Political Science2 (2): 109–38.
40.
PennebakerJames W.BoothRoger J.FrancisMartha E.2007. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Pew Research Center. 2017. Partisan Conflict and Congressional Outreach. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
42.
RedlawskDavid P.2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making.”Journal of Politics64 (4): 1021–44.
43.
RidoutTravis N.SearlesKathleen. 2011. “It’s My Campaign I’ll Cry If I Want to: How and When Campaigns Use Emotional Appeals.”Political Psychology32 (3): 439–58.
44.
SchoenewolfGerald. 1990. “Emotional Contagion: Behavioral Induction in Individuals and Groups.”Modern Psychoanalysis15 (1): 49–61.
45.
SteenbergenMarco R.EllisChristopher. 2006. “Fear and Loathing in American Elections: Context, Traits, and Negative Candidate Affect.” In Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing, edited by RedlawskDavid P., 109–34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
SullivanDenis G.MastersRoger D.1988. “‘Happy Warriors’: Leaders’ Facial Displays, Viewers’ Emotions, and Political Support.”American Journal of Political Science32 (2): 345–68.
47.
TajfelHenryTurnerJohn C.1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.”The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations56 (5): 33–47.
48.
ValentinoNicholas A.BraderTedGroenendykEric W.GregorowiczKryshaHutchingsVincent L.2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.”Journal of Politics73 (1): 156–70.
49.
ValentinoNicholas A.GregorowiczKryshaGroenendykEric W.2009. “Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation.”Political Behavior31 (3): 307–30.
50.
ValentinoNicholas A.NeunerFabian G.2017. “Why the Sky Didn’t Fall: Mobilizing Anger in Reaction to Voter ID Laws.”Political Psychology73 (1): 331–50.
51.
Van der SchalkJobAgneta FischerDoosjeBertjanWigboldusDanielHawkSkylerRotteveelMarkHessUrsula. 2011. “Convergent and Divergent Responses to Emotional Displays of Ingroup and Outgroup.”Emotion11 (2): 286–98.
52.
Van KleefGerben A.2009. “How Emotions Regulate Social Life: The Emotions as Social Information Model.”Current Directions in Psychological Science18 (3): 184–88.
53.
Van KleefGerben A.2016. The Interpersonal Dynamics of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Van KleefGerben AVan DoornEvert A.HeerdinkMarc W.KoningLukas F.2011. “Emotion is for Influence.”European Review of Social Psychology22 (1): 114–63.
55.
Van StekelenburgJacquelien. 2017. “Radicalization and Violent Emotions.”PS: Political Science50 (4): 936–39.
56.
WebsterSteven. 2018. “Anger and Declining Trust in Government in the American Electorate.”Political Behavior40 (4): 933–64.
57.
WebsterSteven. 2020. American Rage: How Anger Shapes Our Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
WebsterStevenAbramovitzAlan. 2017. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the US Electorate.”American Politics Research45 (4): 621–47.
59.
WeeksBrian E.2015. “Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation.”Journal of Communication65 (4): 699–719.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
