Are women in office more likely to providvae access to women’s lobby groups than men in office? If so, how can women’s strategic lobbying increase the responsiveness of male legislators? This paper presents a field experiment examining how women and men in state legislatures respond differently to women’s organizational lobbying. My findings suggest that substantial gender gaps do exist; women are twice as likely to respond to a women’s issue group’s simple meeting request. That said, meeting requests signaling constituent mobilization have heterogeneous effects across legislator gender, doubling the likelihood that a male legislator will respond and effectively closing gender gaps in responsiveness. My results identify how women’s lobbying can employ distinct lobbying strategies on descriptive and nondescriptive representatives to successfully gain their attention. In distinguishing differing pathways toward maximizing opportunities for women’s organizational inclusion in policymaking, this paper importantly informs women’s groups lobbying in state legislatures, wherein low levels of descriptive representation often persist.
AnziaSarah F.2019. “Looking for Influence in All the Wrong Places: How Studying Subnational Policy Can Revive Research on Interest Groups.” The Journal of Politics81 (1): 343–51.
2.
Austen-SmithDavid. 1993. “Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes.” American Journal of Political Science37 (3): 799–833.
3.
Austen-SmithDavidWrightJohn R.1996. “Theory and Evidence for Counteractive Lobbying.” American Journal of Political Science40 (2): 543–64.
4.
BaumgartnerFrank R.BerryJeffrey M.HojnackiMarieLeechBeth L.KimballDavid C.2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BaumgartnerFrank R.LeechBeth L.1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6.
BeckwithKarenCowell-MeyersKiberly. 2007. “Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women’s Political Representation.” Perspectives on Politics5 (3): 553–65.
7.
BerryJeffrey M.1977. Lobbying for the People: The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.
BowenDaniel C.GreeneZachary. 2014. “Should We Measure Professionalism with an Index? A Note on Theory and Practice in State Legislative Professionalism Research.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly14 (3): 277–96.
9.
BroockmanDavid E.2013. “Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science57 (3): 521–36.
10.
BurdenBarry C.2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
BursteinPaulLintonApril. 2002. “The Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movement Organizations on Public Policy: Some Recent Evidence and Theoretical Concerns.” Social Forces81 (2): 380–408.
12.
ButlerDaniel M.BroockmanDavid E.2011. “Do Politicians Racially Discriminate against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 463–77.
13.
CanonDavid T.1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
CarnesNicholas. 2012. “Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?” Legislative Studies Quarterly37 (1): 5–34.
15.
CarrollSusan J.2002. “Representing Women: Congresswomen’s Perceptions of their Representational Roles.” In Women Transforming Congress, edited by RosenthalCindy S., Vol. 4, 50–68. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Crowder-MeyerMelodyCoopermanRosalyn. 2018. “Can’t Buy Them Love: How Party Culture among Donors Contributes to the Party Gap in Women’s Representation.” The Journal of Politics80 (4): 1211–24.
19.
DahlRobert A.1957. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science2 (3): 201–15.
20.
DahlRobert A.1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
21.
DahlerupDrude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority.” Scandinavian Political Studies11 (4): 275–98.
22.
DawsonMichael C.1995. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23.
DodsonDebra L.2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
24.
DoviSuzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?” American Political Science Review96 (4): 729–43.
25.
GaisThomas L.WalkerJack L.1991. “Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements.” In Pathways to Influence in American Politics, edited by WalkerJack L., 103–21. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26.
GarsonDavid G.1974. “On the Origins of Interest-Group Theory: A Critique of a Process.” American Political Science Review68 (4): 1505–19.
27.
GarsonDavid G.1978. Group Theories of Politics. Vol. 30. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
GayClaudine. 2004. “Putting Race in Context: Identifying the Environmental Determinants of Black Racial Attitudes.” American Political Science Review98 (4): 547–62.
29.
GilliganCarol. 1992. In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
30.
GoldsteinKenneth M.1999. Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Participation in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
GrasseNathanHeidbrederBrianne. 2011. “The Influence of Lobbying Activity in State Legislatures: Evidence from Wisconsin.” Legislative Studies Quarterly36 (4): 567–89.
32.
GroseChristian R.2005. “Disentangling Constituency and Legislator Effects in Legislative Representation: Black Legislators or Black Districts?” Social Science Quarterly86 (2): 427–43.
33.
GrossmanGene M.HelpmanElhanan. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34.
HallRichard L.1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
35.
HallRichard L.DeardorffAlan V.2006. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review100 (1): 69–84.
36.
HansenJohn Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919-1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
HeinzJohn P.LaumannEdward O.NelsonRobert L.SalisburyRobert H.1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
38.
HerndonJames F.1982. “Access, Record, and Competition as Influences on Interest Group Contributions to Congressional Campaigns.” The Journal of Politics44 (4): 996–1019.
39.
HolmanMirya R.MahoneyAnna. 2018. “Stop, Collaborate, and Listen: Women’s Collaboration in US State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly43 (2): 179–206.
40.
KanterRosabeth Moss. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Rations and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology82 (5): 965–90.
41.
KollmanKen. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42.
LangbeinLaura I.1986. “Money and Access: Some Empirical Evidence.” The Journal of Politics48 (4): 1052–62.
43.
LazarusJeffreySteigerwaltAmy. 2018. Gendered Vulnerability: How Women Work Harder to Stay in Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
44.
LowiTheodore J.1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: W.W. Norton.
45.
MansbridgeJane.1998. “The Many Faces of Representation.” Politics Research Group Working Paper 98–17. Cambridge, Massachusetts: John F. Kennedy School of Government.
46.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Vol. 26. New Haven: Yale University Press.
47.
NownesAnthony J.FreemanPatricia. 1998. “Interest Group Activity in the States.” The Journal of Politics60 (1): 86–112.
OsbornTracy. 2014. “Women State Legislators and Representation: The Role of Political Parties and Institutions.” State and Local Government Review46 (2): 146–55.
50.
OsbornTracyKreitzerRebecca J.SchillingEmily U.ClarkJennifer Hayes. 2019. “Ideology and Polarization among Women State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly44:647–80.
51.
PetrocikJohn R.1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, With a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science40:825–50.
52.
PhillipsAnne. (ed). 1998. “Democracy and Representation: Or, Why Should It Matter Who Our Representatives Are?” In Feminism and Politics, 224–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
PitkinHanna F. The concept of representation. Vol. 75. Calrifornia, US: University of California Press, 1967.
54.
PottersJanWindenFrans Van. 1992. “Lobbying and Asymmetric Information.” Public Choice74 (3): 269–92.
55.
RasmusenEric. 1993. “Lobbying When the Decision Maker Can Acquire Independent Information.” Public Choice77 (4): 899–913.
56.
ReingoldBeth. 1992. “Concepts of Representation among Female and Male State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17:509–37.
57.
ReingoldBeth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
58.
ReingoldBeth. 2008. “Women as Office Holders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Political Women and American Democracy9:128–47.
59.
RichardsonLilliard E.Jr.FreemanPatricia K.1995. “Gender Differences in Constituency Service among State Legislators.” Political Research Quarterly48 (1): 169–79.
60.
RosenthalAlan. 2000. The Third House: Lobbyists and Lobbying in the States. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
61.
SabatoLarry. 1985. PAC Power: Inside the World of Political Action Committees. New York: W.W. Norton.
62.
SapiroVirginia. 1981. “Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review75 (3): 701–16.
63.
SchlozmanKay LehmanTierneyJohn T.1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
64.
SkocpolThedaAbend-WeinMarjorieHowardChristopherLehmannSusan Goodrich. 1993. “Women’s Associations and the Enactment of Mothers’ Pensions in the United States.” American Political Science Review87 (3): 686–701.
65.
SnyderJames M.Jr.1990. “Campaign Contributions as Investments: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1980-1986.” Journal of Political Economy98 (6): 1195–1227.
66.
SouleSarah A.OlzakSusan. 2004. “When Do Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment.” American Sociological Review69 (4): 473–97.
67.
SwersMichele L.2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
ThomasSue. 1991. “The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.” The Journal of Politics53 (4): 958–76.
69.
ThomsenDanielle M.SwersMichele L.2017. “Which Women Can Run? Gender, Partisanship, and Candidate Donor Networks.” Political Research Quarterly70 (2): 449–63.
70.
WeldonLaurel S.2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” The Journal of Politics64 (4): 1153–74.
71.
WeldonLaurel S.2012. Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
72.
WhitbyKenny J.2000. The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Interests. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
73.
WilliamsMelissa S.1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
74.
WolbrechtChristina. 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
75.
WrightJohn R.1996. Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
