This experiment sent state legislators an email from an individual seeking advice on running for office, varying the gender and party of the sender. This project explores two inquiries—who the legislators choose to respond to and how the legislators’ own gender and partisan identities shape that decision. I theorize that women in politics is a salient issue for legislators; therefore, they will be more willing to advise politically ambitious women. Overall, I find that legislators are more willing to offer help when the aspirant is a woman and of the same party. When primed to further consider women in politics, legislators are more likely to offer gender-specific advice. Democrats rather than women legislators drive this heightened responsiveness to the woman aspirant. These findings highlight what role public officials can play in closing the candidate gender gap, and how legislators’ multiple identities intersect and frame their decisions to aid political aspirants.
AhlerD. J.SoodG. (2018). The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. The Journal of Politics, 80(3), 964–981.
2.
BarnesT. D.CasseseE. C. (2017). American party women: A look at the gender gap within parties. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 127–141.
3.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.
4.
BonneauC. W.KanthakK. (2019). Stronger together: Political ambition and the presentation of women running for office. Politics, Groups, and Identities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1528159
5.
BracicA.Israel-TrummelM.ShortleA. F. (2019). Is sexism for White people? Gender stereotypes, race, and the 2016 presidential election. Political Behavior, 41, 281–307.
6.
BroockmanD. E. (2013). Black politicians are more intrinsically motivated to advance blacks’ interests: A field experiment manipulating political incentives. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 521–536.
7.
BurnsN.SchlozmanK. L.VerbaS. (2001). The private roots of public action. Harvard University Press.
8.
ButlerD. M.BroockmanD. E. (2011). Do politicians racially discriminate against constituents? A field experiment on state legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477.
9.
ButlerD. M.PreeceJ. R. (2016). Recruitment and perceptions of gender bias in party leader support. Political Research Quarterly, 69(4), 842–851.
10.
CampbellD. E.WolbrechtC. (2006). See Jane run: Women politicians as role models for adolescents. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 233–247.
11.
CarrollS. J. (1994). Women as candidates in American politics. Indiana University Press.
12.
CarrollS. J.SanbonmatsuK. (2013). More women can run: Gender and pathways to the state legislatures. Oxford University Press.
13.
CasseseE. C.HolmanM. R. (2016). Religious beliefs, gender consciousness, and women’s political participation. Sex Roles, 75(9–10), 514–527.
ConoverP. J.SapiroV. (1993). Gender, feminist consciousness, and war. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1079–1099.
19.
CoppockA. (2019). Avoiding post-treatment bias in audit experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 6, 1–4.
20.
CostaM. (2017). How responsive are political elites? A meta-analysis of experiments on public officials. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 4(3), 241–254.
21.
Crowder-MeyerM. (2011). The party’s still going: County party strength, activity, and influence. In GreenJ. C.CoffeyD. J. (Eds.), The state of the parties: The changing role of contemporary American parties (pp. 115–134). Rowman & Littlefield.
22.
Crowder-MeyerM. (2013). Gendered recruitment without trying: How local party recruiters affect women’s representation. Politics & Gender, 9(4), 390–413.
23.
Crowder-MeyerM.CoopermanR. (2018). Can’t buy them love: How party culture among donors contributes to the party gap in women’s representation. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1211–1224.
24.
DawsonM. C. (1995). Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics. Princeton University Press.
25.
DittmarK.SanbonmatsuK.CarrollS. J. (2018). A seat at the table: Congresswomen’s perspectives on why their presence matters. Oxford University Press.
26.
EinsteinK. L.GlickD. M. (2017). Does race affect access to government services? An experiment exploring street-level bureaucrats and access to public housing. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 100–116.
GreenD.PalmquistB.SchicklerE. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.
29.
GrossmannM.HopkinsD. A. (2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats. Oxford University Press.
30.
HeldmanC.ConroyM.AckermanA. R. (2018). Sex and gender in the 2016 Presidential Election. ABC-CLIO.
31.
IyengarS.KinderD. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
32.
JonesP. E. (2014). Does the descriptive representation of gender influence accountability for substantive representation?Politics & Gender, 10(2), 175–199.
33.
KalinM.SambanisN. (2018). How to think about social identity. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 239–257.
34.
KallaJ.RosenbluthF.TeeleD. L. (2018). Are you my mentor? A field experiment on gender, ethnicity, and political self-starters. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 337–341.
35.
KingD. C.MatlandR. E. (2003). Sex and the grand old party: An experimental investigation of the effect of candidate sex on support for a Republican candidate. American Politics Research, 31, 595–612.
36.
KingG.ZengL. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9(2), 137–163.
37.
KitchensK. E.SwersM. L. (2016). Why aren’t there more Republican women in Congress? Gender, partisanship, and fundraising support in the 2010 and 2012 elections. Politics & Gender, 12(4), 648–676.
38.
LawlessJ. L. (2004). Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1), 81–99.
39.
LawlessJ. L.FoxR. L. (2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. Cambridge University Press.
40.
MaestasC. (2003). The incentive to listen: Progressive ambition, resources, and opinion monitoring among state legislators. The Journal of Politics, 65(2), 439–456.
41.
MarianiM.MarshallB. W.Mathews-SchultzA. L. (2015). See Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and Sarah Palin run? Party, ideology, and the influence of female role models on young women. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 716–731.
42.
MasonL. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
McDermottM. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51(4), 895–918.
45.
NelsonT. E.ClawsonR. A.OxleyZ. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583.
46.
NivenD. (1998). The missing majority: The recruitment of women as state legislative candidates. Praeger Publishers.
47.
PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 228–278.
48.
PreeceJ. R.StoddardO. B.FisherR. (2016). Run, Jane, run! Gendered responses to political party recruitment. Political Behavior, 38(3), 561–577.
49.
PruysersS.BlaisJ. (2019). Narcissistic women and cash-strapped men: Who can be encouraged to consider running for political office, and who should do the encouraging?Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 229–242.
50.
RinehartS. T. (1992). Gender consciousness and politics. Routledge.
51.
SanbonmatsuK. (2006). Do parties know that “women win”? Party leader beliefs about women’s electoral chances. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 431–450.
ThomasS.HerrickR.BraunsteinM. (2002). Legislative careers: The personal and the political. In RosenthalC. S. (Ed.), Women transforming congress (pp. 397–421). University of Oklahoma Press.
57.
ThomsenD. M. (2017). Opting out of Congress: Partisan polarization and the decline of moderate candidates. Cambridge University Press.
58.
WhiteA. R.NathanN. L.FallerJ. K. (2015). What do I need to vote? Bureaucratic discretion and discrimination by local election officials. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 129–142.
59.
WineingerC. (2018). Gendering Republican Party culture. In OchM.ShamesS. L. (Eds.), The right women: Republican party activists, candidates, and legislators (pp. 25–49). ABC-CLIO.
60.
WolbrechtC. (2002). Female legislators and the women’s rights agenda. In RosenthalC. S. (Ed.), Women transforming congress (pp. 170–194). University of Oklahoma Press.
61.
WordD. L.ColemanC. D.NunziataR.KominskiR. (n.d.). Demographic aspects of surnames from census 2000. (Technical Report). U.S. Census Bureau.
62.
ZingherJ. N. (2014). An analysis of the changing social bases of America’s political parties: 1952–2008. Electoral Studies, 35, 272–282.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
