Ansolabehere and Hersh and others have examined the reported voting behavior of survey respondents using a variety of validation methods, including matching with national voter files provided by outside vendors. This analysis provides the first examination of a thirty-year national longitudinal study and compares the insights obtained from this longitudinal analysis to two 2016 national cross-sectional studies of voting behavior using structural equation modeling. We find that respondents of the longitudinal study overreport at lower rates than respondents in our 2016 samples, and the traditional predictors of overreporting such as political interest, engagement, and partisanship predict overreporting among respondents in both our longitudinal and 2016 short-term panel studies, but our longitudinal data include novel predictors of overreporting such as parent socialization factors. We conclude with a discussion of the phenomenon of overreporting in surveys and how survey accuracy becomes increasingly important for both the public and policymakers in an era of decreasing trust in institutions and expertise.
AbelsonRobert P.LoftusElizabeth F.GreenwaldAnthony G.1992. “Attempts to Improve the Accuracy of Self-Reports of Voting.” In Questions about Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys, edited by TanurJ. M., 138–53. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
2.
AbramowitzAlan I.2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3.
AbramowitzAlan I.2018. The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven: Yale University Press.
4.
AbramsonPaul R.1974. “Generational Change in American Electoral Behavior.” American Political Science Review68:93–105.
5.
AbramsonPaul R.1975. Generational Change in American Politics. Lexington: Lexington Books.
6.
AchenChristopherBartelsLarry. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7.
American National Election Studies. 2017. “User Guide and Codebook for the ANES 2016 Time Series Study and Technical Report.” University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
8.
AndersonBarbara A.SilverBrian D.AbramsonPaul R.1988. “The Effects of Race of the Interviewer on Measures of Electoral Participation by Blacks in SRC National Election Studies.” The Public Opinion Quarterly52 (1): 53–83.
9.
AnsolabehereStephenHershEitan. 2012. “Validation: What Big Data Reveal about Survey Misreporting and the Real Electorate.” Political Analysis20 (4): 437–59.
10.
AnsolabehereStephenHershEitanShepsleKenneth. 2012. “Movers, Stayers, and Registration: Why Age Is Correlated with Registration in the U.S.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science7 (4): 333–63.
11.
AnsolabehereStephenSchaffnerBrianLuksSam. 2017. “Guide to the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” Technical report, Data Release No. 2. Harvard University, Cambridge.
12.
BelliRobert F.TraugottMichael W.BechmannMatthew N.2001. “What Leads to Voting Overreports? Contrasts of Overreporters to Validated Voters and Admitted Nonvoters in the American National Election Studies.” Journal of Official Statistics17 (4): 479–98.
13.
BelliRobert F.TraugottMichael W.YoungMargaretMcGonagleKatherine A.1999. “Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure, and Source Monitoring.” Public Opinion Quarterly63 (1): 90–108.
14.
BerelsonBernard F.LazarsfeldPaul F.McPheeWilliam N.1954. Voting: A Study in Opinion Formation in a Presidential Election. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
BerentMatthew K.KrosnickJon A.LupiaArthur. 2011. “The Quality of Government Records and ‘Over-Estimation’ of Registration and Turnout in Surveys: Lessons from the 2008 ANES Panel Study’s Registration and Turnout Validation Exercises.” Working Paper No. NES 012554. American National Election Studies, Ann Arbor.
16.
BerentMatthew K.KrosnickJon A.LupiaArthur. 2016. “Measuring Voter Registration and Turnout in Surveys Do Official Government Records Yield More Accurate Assessments?” Public Opinion Quarterly80 (3): 597–621.
17.
BergerPeter L.LuckmannThomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor.
18.
BlackEarlBlackMerle. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19.
BradyHenry E.McNultyJohn E.2011. “Turning Out to Vote: The Costs of Finding and Getting to the Polling Place.” The American Political Science Review105 (1): 115–34.
20.
BurdenBarry C.2000. “Voter Turnout and the National Election Studies.” Political Analysis8 (4): 389–98.
21.
BurnsJames M.1963. The Deadlock of Democracy: Four-Party Politics in America. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
22.
CampbellAngusConversePhilip E.MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E.1964. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
23.
CaugheyDevinDunhamJamesWarshawChristopher. 2018. “The Ideological Nationalization of Partisan Subconstituencies in the American States.” Public Choice176(1-2):133–51.
24.
ClausenAage R.1968. “Response Validity: Vote Report.” The Public Opinion Quarterly32 (4): 588–606.
25.
ConversePhillip E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by ApterDavid E.New York: Free Press of Glencoe. Reprinted inCritical Review18 (1–3): 1–74.
26.
CostnerHerbert L.1965. “Criteria for Measures of Association.” American Sociological Review30 (3): 341–45.
27.
DawsonRichard E.PrewittKenneth. 1968. Political Socialization: An Analytic Study. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
28.
DeBellMatthewKrosnickJon A.GeraKatieYeagerDavid S.McDonaldMichael P.2018. “The Turnout Gap in Surveys: Explanations and Solutions.” Sociological Methods & Research. Published electronically May 6. doi:10.1177/0049124118769085.
29.
EastonDavidDennisJack. 1969. Children in the Political System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
EnamoradoTedFifieldBenjaminImaiKosuke. 2018. “Users Guide and Codebook for the ANES 2016 Time Series Voter Validation Supplemental Data.” Technical Report. American National Election Studies, Ann Arbor.
GreensteinFred I.1965. Children and Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
34.
HansenJonas Hedegaard. 2016. “Residential Mobility and Turnout: The Relevance of Social Costs, Timing and Education.” Political Behavior38 (4): 769–91.
35.
HessRobert D.TorneyJudith V.1967. The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Chicago: Aldine.
36.
HobbsWilliam R.2019. “Major Life Events and the Age-Partisan Stability Association.” Political Behavior41 (3): 791–814.
37.
HymanHerbert H.1959. Political Socialization: A Study in the Psychology of Political Behavior. Glencoe: Free Press.
38.
HymanHerbert H.WrightCharles R.ReedJohn S.1975. The Enduring Effects of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
JackmanSimonSpahnBradley. 2019. “Why Does the American National Election Study Overestimate Voter Turnout?” Political Analysis27 (2): 193–207.
40.
JenningsM. KentNiemiRichard G.1974. The Political Character of Adolescence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
JenningsM. KentNiemiRichard G.1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42.
KinderDonald R.KalmoeNathan P.2017. Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
43.
KlarSamaraKrupnikovYannaRyanJohn Barry. 2018. “Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain? Untangling a Dislike for the Opposing Party from a Dislike of Partisanship.” Public Opinion Quarterly82 (2): 379–90.
44.
MasonLilliana. 2018a. “Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities.” Public Opinion Quarterly82 (1): 280–301.
45.
MasonLilliana. 2018b. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
46.
McDonaldMichael P.2018. “2016 November General Election Turnout Rates.” United States Election Project. http://www.electproject.org/2016g.
47.
MillerJon D.LaspraBelén. 2017. “Generation X in Mid-Life: A Summary from the Longitudinal Study of American Life.” Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging41 (3): 27–33.
48.
NiemiRichard G.KatzRichard S.NewmanDavid. 1980. “Reconstructing Past Partisanship: The Failure of the Party Identification Recall Questions.” American Journal of Political Science24 (4): 633–51.
49.
PearsonRobert W.RossMichaelDawesRobyn M.1992. “Personal Recall and the Limits of Retrospective Questions in Surveys.” In Questions about Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys, edited by TanurJ. M., 65–94. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
50.
Pew Research Center. 2018. “Commercial Voter Files and the Study of U.S. Politics.” www.pewresearch.org.
51.
SelbPeterMunzertSimon. 2013. “Voter Overrepresentation, Vote Misreporting, and Turnout Bias in Postelection Surveys.” Electoral Studies32 (1): 186–96.
52.
SilverBrian D.AndersonBarbara A.AbramsonPaul R.1986. “Who Overreports Voting.” American Political Science Review80 (2): 613–24.
53.
SquirePeverillWolfingerRaymond E.GlassDavid P.1987. “Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review81 (1): 45–65.
54.
SternbergRobert J.Ben-ZeevTalia. 2001. Complex Cognition: The Psychology of Human Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
StraussWilliamHoweNeil. 1991. Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069. New York: Morrow.
56.
TraugottMichael W.KatoshJohn P.1979. “Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly43 (3): 359–77.
57.
WeirBlair T.1975. “The Distortion of Voter Recall.” American Journal of Political Science19 (1): 53–62.
58.
WoodwardJ. David. 2006. The New Southern Politics. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
