Focal days of protest are increasingly common to episodes of revolutionary mobilization. This paper explores the significance of focal days in patterning sustained protest in Egypt and Tunisia from 2011 to 2012. In Egypt, resource-poor activists exploited the confluence of worshippers on Fridays to mobilize mass transitory protest. This reliance on ritualized action hindered cross-sectoral coordination and meant mass protest often failed to inflict a direct economic cost. In Tunisia, there was no focal day of protest, in large part due to the coordinating hand of trade unions. In consequence, mass protest was more likely to span multiple sites, sectors, and tactics. These results suggest that oppositions can sustain mass mobilization even absent organizational capacity, but a reliance on a focal day limits the potential of protest over a political transition. Supplementary analyses point to the applicability of our findings to a number of other Arab Spring countries.
AbdelrahmanMaha. 2013. “In Praise of Organization: Egypt between Activism and Revolution.” Development and Change44 (3): 569–85.
2.
BaranyZoltan. 2016. How Armies Respond to Revolutions and Why. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3.
BarrieChristopherKetchleyNeil. 2018. “Opportunity without Organization: Labour Mobilization in Egypt after the 25th January Revolution.” Mobilization23 (2): 181–202.
4.
BeissingerMark R.2013. “The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution.” American Political Science Review107 (3): 574–92.
5.
BenchemsiAhmed. 2014. “Morocco’s Makhzen and the Haphazard Activists.” In Taking to the Streets: The Transformation of Arab Activism, edited by KhatibLinaLustEllen, 199–235. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
ButtAhsan I.2016. “Street Power: Friday Prayers, Islamist Protests, and Islamization in Pakistan.” Politics and Religion9 (1): 1–28.
8.
ChenowethEricaStephanMaria J. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
ChweMichael Suk-Young. 2001. Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10.
ClarkeKillian. 2014. “Unexpected Brokers of Mobilization: Contingency and Networks in the 2011 Egyptian Uprising.” Comparative Politics46 (4): 379–97.
11.
ClemensElisabeth S.1993. “Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women’s Groups and the Transformation of U.S. Politics, 1890-1920.” American Journal of Sociology98 (4): 755–98.
12.
ClemensElisabeth S.MinkoffDebra C. 2004. “Beyond the Iron Law: Rethinking the Place of Organizations in Social Movement Research.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by SnowDavid A.SouleSarah A.KriesiHanspeter, 155–70. Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
DaltonRussellVan SickleAlixWeldonSteven. 2010. “The Individual-Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science40 (1): 51–73.
14.
Droz-VincentPhilippe. 2014. “‘State of Barbary’ (Take Two): From the Arab Spring to the Return of Violence in Syria.” Middle East Journal68 (1): 33–58.
15.
DzenovskaDaceArenasIván. 2012. “Don’t Fence Me In: Barricade Sociality and Political Struggles in Mexico and Latvia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History54 (3): 644–78.
16.
FisherDana R.StanleyKevinBermanDavidNeffGina. 2005. “How Do Organizations Matter? Mobilization and Support for Participants at Five Globalization Protests.” Social Problems52 (1): 102–21.
17.
FranciscoRonald A.2004. “After the Massacre: Mobilization in the Wake of Harsh Repression.” Mobilization9 (2): 107–26.
18.
FranciscoRonald A.2010. Collective Action Theory and Empirical Evidence. New York: Springer.
19.
GerhardsJürgenRuchtDieter. 1992. “Organizing and Framing in Two Protest Campaigns in West Germany.” American Journal of Sociology98 (3): 555–96.
20.
GunningJeroenBaronIlan Zvi. 2013. Why Occupy a Square? People, Protests and Movements in the Egyptian Revolution. London: Hurst & Company.
21.
HaggardStephanKaufmanRobert R. 2016. Dictators and Democrats: Masses Elites, and Regime Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22.
HmedChoukri. 2015. “Abeyance Networks, Contingency and Structures: History and Origins of the Tunisian Revolution.” Revue Française de Science Politique62:31–53.
23.
HornNancyTillyCharles. 1988. “Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain, 1758-1834, ICPSR08872-v2.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08872.v2 (accessed December 20 2017).
KadivarAli. 2018. “Mass Mobilization and the Durability of New Democracies.” American Sociological Review83 (2): 390–417.
26.
KauffmanStuart. 1995. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
KetchleyNeil. 2013. “The Muslim Brothers Take to the Streets.” Middle East Report269:12–17.
28.
KetchleyNeil. 2017. Egypt in a Time of Revolution: Contentious Politics and the Arab Spring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KoopmansRuudOlzakSusan. 2004. “Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right-Wing Violence in Germany.” American Journal of Sociology110 (1): 198–230.
30.
KurzmanCharles. 2004. The Unthinkable Revolution in Iran. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31.
LichbachMark Irving. 1995. The Rebel’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
32.
LohmannSusanne. 1994. “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989-91.” World Politics47 (1): 42–101.
33.
MasoudTarek. 2014. Counting Islam: Religion, Class and Elections in Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
McAdamDougBoudetHilary Schaffer. 2012. Putting Social Movements in Their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000-2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
McCammonHolly J.2012. Women’s Jury Movements and Strategic Adaptation: A More Just Verdict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology82 (6): 1212–41.
37.
MinkoffDebra C.1997. “The Sequencing of Social Movements.” American Sociological Review62 (5): 779–99.
38.
OliverPamela E.ManeyGregory M. 2000. “Political Processes and Local Newspaper Coverage of Protest Events: From Selection Bias to Triadic Interactions.” American Journal of Sociology106 (2): 463–505.
39.
OppKarl-DieterGernChristiane. 1993. “Dissident Groups, Personal Networks, and Spontaneous Cooperation: The East German Revolution of 1989.” American Sociological Review58 (5): 659–80.
40.
PfaffStevenYangGuobin. 2001. “Double-Edged Rituals and the Symbolic Resources of Collective Action: Political Commemorations and the Mobilization of Protest in 1989.” Theory and Society30 (4): 539–89.
41.
RaleighClionadhLinkeAndrewHegreHavardKarlsenJoakim. 2010. “Introducing ACLED: An Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset: Special Data Feature.” Journal of Peace Research47 (5): 651–60.
42.
RaslerKaren. 1996. “Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review61 (1): 132–52.
43.
SchellingThomas. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
44.
SchockKurt. 2005. Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Nondemocracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
45.
SnowDavid A.MossDana M. 2014. “Protest on the Fly: Toward a Theory of Spontaneity in the Dynamics of Protest and Social Movements.” American Sociological Review79 (6): 1122–43.
46.
Steinert-ThrelkeldZachary C.2017a. “Longitudinal Network Analysis with Incomplete Data.” Political Analysis25 (3): 308–28.
47.
Steinert-ThrelkeldZachary C.2017b. “Spontaneous Collective Action: Peripheral Mobilization during the Arab Spring.” American Political Science Review111 (2): 379–403.
48.
TarrowSidney. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
TaylorVerta. 1989. “Social Movement Continuity: The Women’s Movement in Abeyance.” American Sociological Review54 (5): 761–75.
50.
TraugottMark. 2010. The Insurgent Barricade. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
TuckerJoshua A.2007. “Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-communist Colored Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics5 (3): 535–51.
YousfiHéla. 2015. L’UGTT, une passion tunisienne: Enquête sur les syndicalistes en révolution (2011-2014). Paris: Karthala.
54.
ZaldMayer N.McCarthyJohn D. 2002. “The Resource Mobilization Research Program: Progress, Challenge, and Transformation.” In New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by BergerJosephZelditchMorris, 147–171. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
