Political leaders often have private incentives to pursue socially wasteful projects, but not all leaders are able to pursue these interests. We argue that weaker accountability mechanisms allow autocratic leaders to more easily realize wasteful projects than democratic leaders. We focus on one particular project, skyscraper construction, where we obtain objective measures comparable across different contexts. We test different implications from our argument by drawing on a new dataset recording all buildings exceeding 150 m, globally. We find that autocracies systematically build more new skyscrapers than democracies. Furthermore, autocratic skyscrapers are more excessive than democratic ones, and—in contrast with democracies—autocracies pursue skyscraper projects to about the same extent in rural/poor and urban/rich societies. When investigating different mechanisms entailed in our argument, the link between regime type and skyscraper construction seems due in large part to stronger vertical accountability mechanisms and more open information environments in democracies.
AcemogluDaronRobinsonJames A.2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AdesAlberto F.GlaeserEdward L.1995. “Trade and Circuses: Explaining Urban Giants.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics110 (1): 195–227.
3.
AnckarCarstenFredrikssonCecilia2018. “Classifying Political Regimes 1800–2016: A Typology and a New Dataset.” European Political Science. Published electronically March 14. doi:10.1057/s41304-018-0149-8.
4.
BarrJason. 2012. “Skyscraper Height.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics45 (3): 723–53.
5.
BesleyTimothy. 2006. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BoltJuttavan ZandenJan Luiten. 2014. “The Maddison Project: Collaborative Research on Historical National Accounts.” The Economic History Review67 (3): 627–51.
7.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlistairSiversonRandolph M.MorrowJames D.2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8.
CharronNicholasLapuenteVictor. 2010. “Does Democracy Produce Quality of Government.” European Journal of Political Research49 (4): 471–95.
Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. 2013. “Tall Buildings in Numbers.” CTBUH Journal3:42–43.
11.
Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. 2016. “The Skyscraper Center: The Global Tall Building Database of the CTBUH.” Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Chicago.
12.
DelaneyKevin J.EcksteinRick. 2003. Public Dollars, Private Stadiums: The Battle Over Building Sports Stadiums. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
13.
FerejohnJohn A.1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice50 (1–3): 5–25.
14.
GandhiJennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GeddesBarbaraWrightJosephFrantzErica. 2014. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transition: A New Data Set.” Perspectives on Politics12 (2): 313–31.
16.
GerringJohnThackerStrom C.AlfaroRodrigo. 2012. “Democracy and Human Development.” Journal of Politics74 (1): 1–17.
17.
GuiffreyJules. 1901. Comptes Des Bâtiments Du Roi Sous Le Règne de Louis Xiv. Tome Deuxième, Colbert et Louvois, 1681-1687 [Accounts of the Buildings of the King under the Reign of Louis XIV. Second Volume. Colbert and Louvois, 1681-1687]. Edited by Imprimerie nationale. Paris: Jules Guiffrey.
18.
HaberStephenMenaldoVictor. 2011. “Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse.” American Political Science Review105 (1): 1–26.
19.
HainmuellerJens. 2011. “Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies.” Political Analysis20 (1): 25–46.
20.
HardingRobin. 2015. “Attribution and Accountability: Voting for Roads in Ghana.” World Politics67 (4): 656–89.
21.
HodlerRolandRaschkyPaul A.2014. “Regional Favoritism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics129 (2): 995–1033.
22.
HollyerJames R.RosendorffB. PeterVreelandJames Raymond. 2011. “Democracy and Transparency.” Journal of Politics73 (4): 1191–1205.
23.
IacusStefano M.KingGaryPorroGuiseppe. 2012. “Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis20 (1): 1–24.
24.
KnutsenCarl Henrik. 2010. “Measuring Effective Democracy.” International Political Science Review31 (2): 109–28.
25.
KnutsenCarl Henrik. 2011. “Democracy, Dictatorship and Protection of Property Rights.” Journal of Development Studies47 (1): 164–82.
26.
KnutsenCarl HenrikGerringJohnSkaaningSvend-ErikTeorellJanMaguireMatthewCoppedgeMichaelLindbergStaffan I.2019. “Economic Development and Democracy: An Electoral Connection.” European Journal of Political Research58 (1): 292–314.
27.
LakeDavid A.BaumMatthew A.2001. “The Invisible Hand of Democracy: Political Control and the Provision of Public Services.” Comparative Political Studies35 (6): 587–621.
28.
LeftwichAdrian. 2000. States of Development: On the Primacy of Politics in Development. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29.
LehneJonathanShapiroJacob N.EyndeOliver Vanden. 2018. “Building Connections: Political Corruption and Road Construction in India.” Journal of Development Economics131 (March): 62–78.
NorthDouglass C.WeingastBarry R.1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions in Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” The Journal of Economic History49 (4): 803–32.
32.
OlkenBenjamin. 2007. “Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” Journal of Political Economy115 (2): 200–49.
33.
PemsteinDanielMarquardtKyle L.TzelgovEitanWangYi-tingKrusselJoshuaMiriFarhad. 2018. “The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3167764.
34.
PierskallaJan H.SacksAudrey. 2018. “Unpaved Road Ahead: The Consequences of Election Cycles for Capital Expenditures.” Journal of Politics80 (2): 510–24.
35.
PrzeworskiAdam. 2000. States and Markets: A Primer in Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PrzeworskiAdam. 2010. Democracy and the Limits of Self-government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
PrzeworskiAdamAlvarezMichael E.CheibubJosé AntonioLimongiFernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
RobinsonJames A.TorvikRagnar. 2005. “White Elephants.” Journal of Political Economy89 (2): 197–210.
39.
RockMichael. 2009. “Corruption and Democracy.” Journal of Development Studies45 (1): 55–75.
40.
RodrikDani. 2008. One Economics, Many Recipes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
RowleyCharlesTollisonRobert D.TullockGordon. 1988. The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking. New York: Springer.
42.
SvolikMilan W.2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
TeorellJanCoppedgeMichaelLindbergStaffan I.SkaaningSvend-Erik. 2019. “Measuring Polyarchy Across the Globe, 1900–2017.” Studies in Comparative International Development54:71–95.
45.
TreismanDaniel. 2007. “What Have We Learned about the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research?”Annual Review of Political Science10:211–44.
46.
WadeRobert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
47.
WilliamsMartin J.2017. “The Political Economy of Unfinished Development Projects: Corruption, Clientelism, or Collective Choice?”American Political Science Review111 (4): 705–23.
48.
WrightJoseph. 2008. “Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment.” American Political Science Review52 (2): 322–43.
49.
YoungAlwyn. 1995. “The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics110 (3): 641–80
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
