We explore the consequences of involvement in scandal for members of Congress’ (MCs) success within the House of Representatives. Our analyses target all MCs who served in the 101st to 112th Congresses (1989–2012). Across this time period, we identify 253 discrete member-term observations of professional or personal scandal. Our results demonstrate that scandal stalls the upward trajectory of MCs’ careers in the chamber, affecting their levels of legislative effectiveness, their centrality to the congressional network, and their likelihood of gaining or losing prestigious committee assignments and leadership positions. Importantly, these effects can linger beyond the term following scandal, shaping MCs’ behavior into the future. Our findings demonstrate that in addition to negative electoral repercussions, scandals can have important legislative consequences for members.
BarnesTiffany D.BeaulieuEmilySaxtonGregory W. Forthcoming. “Sex and Corruption: How Sexism Shapes Voters’ Responses to Scandal.” Politics, Groups, and Identities.
2.
BasingerScott. 2012. “Scandals and Congressional Elections in the Post-Watergate Era.” Political Research Quarterly66 (2): 385–98.
3.
BasingerScott. 2016. “Scandals and Ethics Reform in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Public Integrity18 (4): 359–75.
4.
BasingerScottBrownLaraHarrisDouglasGulatiGirish. 2013. “Counting and Classifying Congressional Scandals.” In Scandal!: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Consequences, Outcomes, and Significance of Political Scandals, edited by. DagnesAlisonSachlebenMark. New York: Bloomsbury, 3–28.
5.
BerinskyAdamHutchingsVincentMendelbergTaliShakerLeeValentinoNicholas. 2011. “Sex and Race: Are Black Candidates More Likely to be Disadvantaged by Sex Scandals?”Political Behavior33 (2): 179–202.
6.
BernhardWilliamSulkinTracy. 2013. “Commitment and Consequences: Reneging on Cosponsorship Pledges in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly38(4): 461–487.
7.
BernhardWilliamSulkinTracy. 2018. Legislative Style. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BhattiYosefHansenKasperOlsenAsmus Leth. 2013. “Political Hypocrisy: The Effect of Political Scandals on Candidate Evaluations.” Acta Politica48 (4): 408–28.
9.
BowlerShaunKarpJeffrey. 2004. “Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government.” Political Behavior26 (3): 271–87.
10.
BrownLara. 2006. “Revisiting the Character of Congress: Scandals in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1966-2002.” Journal of Political Marketing5 (1): 149–72.
11.
CarlsonJamesGanielGladysHydeMark. 2000. “Scandal and Political Candidate Image.” Politics & Policy28 (4): 747–57.
12.
ChanleyVirginiaRudolphThomasRahnWendy. 2000. “The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly64 (3): 239–56.
13.
CobbMichaelTaylorAndrew. 2014. “Paging Congressional Democrats: It Was the Immorality, Stupid.” PS: Political Science and Politics47 (2): 351–56.
14.
DanceyLogan. 2014. “Reform on My Terms: Partisan and Ideological Responses to a Corruption Scandal.” PS: Political Science and Politics42 (2): 367–71.
15.
DickinsonDavidVillevalMarie-Claire. 2008. “Does Monitoring Decrease Work Effort?”Games and Economic Behavior61 (1): 56–76.
16.
DohertyDavidDowlingConorMillerMichael. 2011. “Are Financial or Moral Scandals Worse? It Depends.” PS: Political Science and Politics44 (4): 749–57.
17.
DohertyDavidDowlingConorMillerMichael. 2014. “Does Time Heal All Wounds? Sex Scandals, Tax Evasion, and the Passage of Time.” PS: Political Science & Politics47 (2): 357–66.
18.
EntmanRobert. 2012. Scandal and Silence: Media Responses to Presidential Misconduct. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
19.
FowlerJames. 2006. “Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks.” Political Analysis14 (4): 456–87.
20.
FrischScottKellySean. 2006. Committee Assignment Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
21.
FunkCarolyn. 1996. “The Impact of Scandal on Candidate Evaluations: An Experimental Test of the Role of Candidate Traits.” Political Behavior18 (1): 1–24.
22.
GrosecloseTimothyKrehbielKeith. 1994. “Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirements from the 102nd House.” American Journal of Politics Science38 (1): 75–99.
23.
HamelBrian T.MillerMichael G. Forthcoming. “How Voters Punish and Donors Protect Legislators Embroiled in Scandal.” Political Research Quarterly.
24.
HarkinBenjaminWebbThomas L.ChangBetty P. I.PrestwichAndrewConnerMarkKellarIanBennYaelSheeranPaschal. 2016. “Does Monitoring Goal Progress Promote Goal Attainment? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence.” Psychological Bulletin142 (2): 198–229.
25.
HendryDavidJacksonRobertMondakJeffery. 2008. “Abramoff, Email, and the Mistreated Mistress.” In Fault Lines: Why the Republicans Lost Congress, edited by MondakJefferyMitchellDon-Gene. New York: Routledge, 100–26.
26.
HerrickRebekah. 2000. “Who Will Survive? An Exploration of the Factors Contributing to the Removal of Unethical House Members.” American Politics Research28 (1): 96–109.
27.
HetheringtonMarc J.RudolphThomas J.2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
HoDanielImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth. 2007a. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis15 (3): 199–236.
29.
HoDanielImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth. 2007b. “Matchit: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference.” Journal of Statistical Software42 (8): 1–28.
30.
IacusStefano M.KingGaryPorroGiuseppe. 2012. “Causal Inference Without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis20 (1): 1–24.
31.
JacobsonGaryDimockMichael. 1994. “Checking Out: The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science38 (3): 601–24.
32.
KeeleLuke. 2007. “Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government.” American Journal of Political Science51 (2): 241–54.
33.
KirbyJames. 1985. “The Role of the Electorate in Congressional Ethics.” In Representation and Responsibility, edited by JenningsBruceCallahanDaniel. New York: Plenum Press, 29–37.
34.
LazarusJeffrey. 2008. “Incumbent Vulnerability and Challenger Entry in Statewide Elections.” American Politics Research36 (1): 108–29.
McDermottMonikaSchwartzDouglasVallejoSebastian. 2015. “Talking the Talk But Not Walking the Walk: Public Reactions to Hypocrisy in Political Scandal.” American Politics Research43 (6): 952–74.
37.
PereiraMiguel M.WaterburyNick. Forthcoming. “Do Voters Discount Political Scandals Over Time?” Political Research Quarterly.
38.
PetersJohnWelchSusan. 1980. “The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review74 (3): 697–708.
39.
PrainoRodrigoStockemerDanielMoscardelliVincent. 2013. “The Lingering Effect of Scandals in Congressional Elections: Incumbents, Challengers, and Voters.” Social Science Quarterly94 (4): 1045–61.
40.
RomanoMichael K.2014. “Tuning in to Scandal: Television News Coverage of Congressional Scandals.” PS: Political Science and Politics47 (2): 386–90.
41.
RottinghausBrandon. 2015. The Institutional Effects of Executive Scandal. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
StockemerDanielPraino.Rodrigo Forthcoming. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Do Attractive Politicians Get a ‘Break’ When They are Involved in Scandals?” Political Behavior.
43.
ThompsonJohn. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. New York: John Wiley.
44.
VoldenCraigWisemanAlan. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
VonnahmeBeth Miller. 2014. “Surviving Scandal: An Exploration of the Immediate and Lasting Effects of Scandal on Candidate Evaluation.” Social Science Quarterly95 (5): 1308–21.
46.
WelchSusanHibbingJohn. 1997. “The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982-1990.” The Journal of Politics. 59 (1): 226–39.
47.
WilliamsRobert. 1998. Political Scandals in the USA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
