To what extent is populist rule associated with a decline in press freedom and freedom of expression? Populist rule refers to government headed by charismatic leaders who seek to gain and retain power by mobilizing mass constituencies that are typically free of other political attachments. Populism in this sense matters for two reasons: (1) controlling the media is a core objective of populists compared with other types of political leaders, who can rely on other organizational links to supporters; and (2) the interests of populist parties are virtually equivalent to the interests of party leaders, which means that populists face different time horizons and constraints on their behavior than the leaders of more deeply institutionalized parties. Using cross-national data on up to ninety-one countries from 1980 to 2014, this paper tests whether populist rule is associated with the erosion of press freedom and freedom of expression relative to other types of government and whether any effect is conditional on the ideology of the populist government in question. It finds that populist rule is associated with a decline in most measures of media freedom relative to programmatic party rule. However, this effect is lessened for right-leaning populist governments.
AbrigoMichael R. M.LoveInessa. 2015. “Estimation of Panel Vector Autoregression in Stata: A Package of Programs.” Paper presented at the Panel Data Conference, Central European University, Budapest, February. http://paneldataconference2015.ceu.hu/Program/Michael-Abrigo.pdf.
2.
AllcottHuntGentzkowMatthew. 2017. “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives31 (2): 211–36.
BesleyTimothyBurgessRobinPratAndrea. 2002. “Mass Media and Political Accountability.” In The Right to Tell: The Role of Mass Media in Economic Development, edited by IslamRoumeenDjankovSimeonMcLeishCaralee, 45–60. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
5.
BlakeleyGeorgina. 2001. “Clientelism in the Building of State and Civil Society in Spain.” In Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective, edited by PiattoniSimona, 77–100. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CheibubJosé A.GandhiJenniferVreelandJames R.2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice143 (1): 67–101.
7.
CoppedgeMichaelGerringJohnLindbergStaffan I.SkaaningSvend-ErikTeorellJanAltmanDavidBernhardMichael, et al. 2017. “V-Dem Codebook v7.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://www.v-dem.net/en/.
8.
Di TellaTorcuato. 1965. “Populism and Reform in Latin America.” In Obstacles to Change in Latin America, edited by VelizClaudio, 47–73. London: Oxford University Press.
GurovBorisZankinaEmilia. 2013. “Populism and the Construction of Political Charisma: Post-transition Politics in Bulgaria.” Problems of Post-Communism60 (1): 3–17.
16.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo. 2012. Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HallinDaniel C.PapathanassopoulosStylianos. 2002. “Political Clientelism and the Media: Southern Europe and Latin America in Comparative Perspective.” Media, Culture & Society24 (2): 175–95.
18.
HawkinsKirkRovira KaltwasserCristóbal. 2018. “Introduction—Concept, Theory, and Method.” In The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis, edited by HawkinsKirkCarlinRyan E.LittvayLeventeRovira KaltwasserCristóbal, 1–24. New York: Routledge.
HouleChristianKennyPaul D.2018. “The Political and Economic Consequences of Populist Rule in Latin America.” Government and Opposition53 (2): 256–87.
21.
HuberRobert A.RuthSaskia P.2017. “Mind the Gap! Populism, Participation and Representation in Europe.” Swiss Political Science Review23 (4): 462–84.
22.
HuberRobert A.SchimpfChristian H.2016. “Friend or Foe? Testing the Influence of Populism on Democratic Quality in Latin America.” Political Studies64 (4): 872–89.
23.
HuberRobert A.SchimpfChristian H.2017. “On the Distinct Effects of Left-Wing and Right-Wing Populism on Democratic Quality.” Politics and Governance5 (4): 146–65.
24.
KatsambekisGiorgos. 2017. “The Populist Surge in Post-democratic Times: Theoretical and Political Challenges.” The Political Quarterly88 (2): 202–10.
25.
KeeleLukeKellyNathan J.2006. “Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables.” Political Analysis14 (2): 186–205.
26.
KennyPaul D.2017. Populism and Patronage: Why Populists Win Elections in India, Asia, and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
KennyPaul D.2019. Populism in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KennyPaul D.HolmesRonald. 2018, July. “A New Penal Populism? Rodrigo Duterte, the War on Drugs, and Public Opinion in the Philippines.” Paper presented at the World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Brisbane.
29.
KovachBillRosenstielTom. 2007. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Three Rivers Press.
30.
LaclauErnestoMouffeChantal. 2013. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
31.
LaddJonathan M.2012. Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32.
MairPeter. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.
33.
MarchiRegina. 2012. “With Facebook, Blogs, and Fake News, Teens Reject Journalistic ‘Objectivity.’” Journal of Communication Inquiry36 (3): 246–62.
34.
MazzoleniGianpetro. 2008. “Populism and the Media.” In Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, edited by AlbertazziDanieleMcDonnellDuncan, 15–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
MazzoliniGianpetroStewartJulianneHorsfieldBruce, eds. 2003. The Media and Neo-populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis. Westport: Praeger.
36.
McQuailDenis2000. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage
MouzelisNicos. 1985. “On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Modes of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Polities.” Politics & Society14 (3): 329–48.
41.
MuddeCas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition39 (4): 542–63.
42.
MuddeCas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
MuddeCasRovira KaltwasserCristóbal. 2013. “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government and Opposition48 (2): 147–74.
44.
MuellerJohn. 1992. “Democracy and Ralph’s Pretty Good Grocery: Elections, Equality, and Minimal Human Being.” American Journal of Political Science36 (4): 983–1003.
45.
MüllerJan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
46.
OtjesSimonLouwerseTom. 2015. “Populists in Parliament: Comparing Left-Wing and Right-Wing Populism in the Netherlands.” Political Studies63 (1): 60–79.
47.
PanebiancoAngelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
PappasTakis. 2015. “Modern Populism: Research Advances, Conceptual and Methodological Pitfalls, and the Minimal Definition.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.17.
49.
PrzeworskiAdam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy’s Value, edited by ShapiroIanHacker-CordónCasiano, 23–55. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rovira KaltwasserCristóbal. 2012. “The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy.” Democratization19 (2): 184–208.
53.
RuthSaskia P.2018. “Populism and the Erosion of Horizontal Accountability in Latin America.” Political Studies66:356–75.
54.
SabatiniFabio. 2012. “Who Trusts Berlusconi? An Econometric Analysis of the Role of Television in the Political Arena.” Kyklos65 (1): 111–31.
55.
SchmidtSteffen W.ScottJames C.LandéCarl H.GuastiLaura, eds. 1977. Friends, Followers, and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
StrömbäckJesper2008. “Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13 (3): 228–246.
TsuiLokman. 2015. “The Coming Colonization of Hong Kong Cyberspace: Government Responses to the Use of New Technologies by the Umbrella Movement.” Chinese Journal of Communication8 (4): 1–9.
60.
ValentiniMarina.2015. “The Impact of Party Orientation on Political Risk and Foreign Direct Investment Flows.” Senior Honors thesis, New York University.
61.
Van BelleDouglas A.2000. Press Freedom and Global Politics. Westport: Praeger.
62.
van NiekerkA. E. 1974. Populism and Political Development in Latin America. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.
63.
WeylandKurt. 2001. “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics34 (1): 1–22.
64.
WeylandKurt. 2017. “Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by Rovira KaltwasserCristóbalTaggartPaulEspejoPaulina OchoaOstiguyPierre, 48–72. New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
Whitten-WoodringJeniferVan BelleDouglas A.2017. “The Correlates of Media Freedom: An Introduction of the Global Media Freedom Dataset.” Political Science Research and Methods5 (1): 179–88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
