What are the electoral impacts of perceptions of unemployment under different partisan persuasions of the government? Neither the literature on retrospective economic voting nor partisan voting has provided a compelling answer to this question. This paper addresses this puzzle by analyzing panel surveys and leveraging differences in government partisanship in two consecutive elections. I argue that negative evaluations of the employment situation induce voter transition to support a left-wing party under a right-wing government, but that such voter perceptions do not affect vote choice under a left-wing government. An analysis of a voter transition, using British Election Panel Study 1992–1997 and 1997–2001, reveals findings that support my argument. My argument suggests conditional partisan voting effects. Essentially, the effect of economic issues on vote choice is conditional on issue salience and which party “owns” the issue, namely, the varying levels of issue salience related to government partisanship.
AlesinaAlbertoRoubiniNouriel. 1997. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AltJames E.1979. The Politics of Economic Decline: Economic Management and Political Behaviour in Britain since 1964. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AndersonChristopher J.1995. Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
4.
AndersonChristopher J.MendesSylviaTverdovaYulia. 2004. “Endogenous Economic Voting: Evidence from the 1997 British Election.” Electoral Studies23:683–708.
5.
AndersonChristopher J.PontussonJonas. 2007. “Workers, Worries and Welfare States: Social Protection and Job Insecurity in 15 OECD Countries.” European Journal of Political Research46 (2): 211–35.
6.
AnsolabehereStephenMeredithMarcSnowbergErik. 2013. “Asking about Numbers: Why and How.” Political Analysis21 (1): 48–69.
7.
BartelsLarry M.2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior24 (1): 117–50.
8.
BartelsLarry M.2014. “Ideology and Retrospection in Electoral Responses to the Great Recession.” In Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes, and Protest in the Great Recession, edited by BartelsLarryBermeoNancy, 185–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
BartleJohn. 2002. “Why Labour Won – Again.” In Britain at the Polls, 2001, edited by KingAnthony, 164–206. New York: Chatham House.
10.
BecherMichaelDonnellyMichael. 2013. “Economic Performance, Individual Evaluations, and the Vote: Investigating the Causal Mechanism.” The Journal of Politics75:968–79.
11.
BlountSimon. 2002. “Unemployment and Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies21:91–100.
12.
BudgeIanFarlieDennis J.1983. Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: Allen & Unwin.
13.
ClarkeHarold D.SandersDavidStewartMarianne C.WhiteleyPaul. 2009. Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
ClarkeHarold D.StewartMarianne C.WhiteleyPaul. 1998. “Political Change and Party Choice: Voting in the 1997 General Election.” In British Elections and Parties Review, Vol. 8, edited by DenverDavidFisherJustinCowleyPhilipPattie, 9–34Charles. London: Frank Cass.
15.
DickersonBradley T.OndercinHeather L.2016. “Conditional Motivated Reasoning: How the Local Economy Moderates Partisan Motivations in Economic Perceptions.” Political Research Quarterly70 (1): 194–208.
16.
DigglePeterHeagertyPatrickLiangKung-YeeZegerScott L.2002. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
DuchRaymond M.StevensonRandolph T.2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
EmmeneggerPatrickMarxPaulSchraffDominick. 2015. “Labour Market Disadvantage, Political Orientations and Voting: How Adverse Labour Market Experiences Translate into Electoral Behaviour.” Socio-Economic Review13 (2): 189–213.
19.
EriksonRobert S.1989. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote.” American Political Science Review83:67–76.
20.
EvansGeoffrey. 1998. “Euroscepticism and Conservative Electoral Support: How an Asset became a Liability.” British Journal of Political Science28 (4): 573–90.
21.
EvansGeoffreyAndersenRobert. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” The Journal of Politics68 (1): 194–207.
22.
GrafsteinRobert. 2005. “The Impact of Employment Status on Voting Behavior.” The Journal of Politics67 (3): 804–24.
23.
HealyAndrewMalhortaNeil. 2013. “Retrospective Voting Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science16:285–306.
24.
HeathAnthonyJowellRogerCurtice.John1999. British Election Panel Study, 1992-1997 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. London, England: Social and Community Planning Research [producer], 1998. Colchester, England: ESRC Data Archive/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 1999.
25.
HeathAnthonyJowellRogerCurticeJohn. 2002. British Election Panel Study, 1997-2002 [computer file]. 4th ed.Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], 2002. SN: 4028.
26.
HelgasonAgnar FreyrMerolaVittorio. 2017. “Employment Insecurity, Incumbent Partisanship, and Voting Behavior in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies50 (11): 1489–1523.
27.
HellwigTimothy. 2008. “Globalization, Policy Constraints, and Vote Choice.” The Journal of Politics70 (4): 1128–41.
28.
HibbsDouglas A.Jr.1979. “The Mass Public and Macroeconomic Performance: the Dynamics of Public Opinion toward Unemployment and Inflation.” American Journal of Political Science23:705–31.
29.
HibbsDouglas A.Jr.1982. “The Dynamics of Political Support for American Presidents among Occupational and Partisan Groups.” American Journal of Political Science26 (2): 312–32.
30.
HopkinsDaniel. 2012. “Whose Economy? Perceptions of National Economic Performance during Unequal Growth.” Public Opinion Quarterly76 (1): 50–71.
31.
HuberGregory A.HillSeth J.LenzGabriel S.2012. “Sources of Bias in Retrospective Decision Making: Experimental Evidence on Voters’ Limitations in Controlling Incumbents.” American Political Science Review106 (4): 720–41.
32.
IndridasonIndridi. 2014. “The Collapse: Economic Considerations in Vote Choice in Iceland.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties24 (2): 134–59.
33.
KayserMark AndreasPeressMichael. 2012. “Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison.” American Political Science Review106 (3): 661–84.
34.
KiewietD. Roderick. 1981. “Policy-Oriented Voting in Response to Economic Issues.” American Political Science Review75:448–59.
35.
KwonHyeok Yong. 2008. “A Dynamic Analysis of Partisan Voting: The Issue Salience Effect of Unemployment in South Korea.” Electoral Studies27 (3): 518–32.
36.
LindvallJohannes. 2014. “The Electoral Consequences of Two Great Crises.” European Journal of Political Research53:747–65.
37.
NannestadPeterPaldamMartin. 2002. “The Cost of Ruling: A Foundation Stone for Two Theories.” In Economic Voting, edited by DorussenHanTaylorMichael, 17–44. New York: Routledge.
38.
PalmerHarveyWhittenGuy D.2011. “Through Thick and Thin? The Dynamics of Government Support across Income Groups during Economic Crises.” Electoral Studies30 (3): 427–37.
39.
PetrocikJ. R.1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science40:825–50.
40.
PowellG. BinghamWhittenGuy D.1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science37 (2): 391–414.
41.
PriorMarcusSoodGauravKhannaKabir. 2015. “You Cannot be Serious: The Impact of Accuracy Incentives on Partisan Bias in Reports of Economic Perceptions.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science10:489–518.
42.
PrzeworskiAdamStokesSusanManinBernard, eds. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
RehmPhillip. 2016. Risk Inequality and Welfare States: Social Policy Preferences, Development, and Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
SandersDavid. 1996. “Economic Performance, Management Competence and the Outcome of the Next General Election.” Political Studies44 (1): 203–31.
45.
SandersDavid. 1999. “The Impact of Left-Right Ideology.” In Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-Term Perspective, edited by EvansGeoffreyNorrisPippa, 181–206. London: SAGE.
46.
SingerMatthew M.2013a. “Economic Voting in an Era of Non-crisis: The Changing Electoral Agenda in Latin America, 1982–2010.” Comparative Politics45 (2): 169–85.
47.
SingerMatthew M.2013b. “What Goes around Comes around: Perceived Vulnerable Employment and Economic Voting in Developing Countries.” European Journal of Political Research52:143–63.
48.
StevensonRandolph T.2001. “The Economy and Policy Mood: A Fundamental Dynamic of Democratic Politics?” American Journal of Political Science45 (3): 620–33.
49.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–69.
50.
TillmanEric R.2008. “Economic Judgments, Party Choice, and Voter Abstention in Cross-National Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies41 (9): 1290–1309.
51.
TuckerJoshua A.2006. Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990-1999. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
van der BrugWoutervan der EjjkC.FranklinMark N.2007. The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WarwickPaul. 1992. “Economic Trends and Government Survival in West European Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review86 (4): 875–87.
54.
WeatherfordM. Stephen. 1978. “Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes: Class Differences in the Political Response to Recession.” American Journal of Political Science22 (4): 917–38.
55.
WeatherfordM. Stephen. 1983. “Economic Voting and the ‘Symbolic Politics’ Argument: A Reinterpretation and Synthesis.” American Political Science Review77 (1): 158–74.
56.
WhittenGuy D.PalmerHarvey D.1996. “Heightening Comparativists’ Concern for Model Choice: Voting Behavior in Great Britain and the Netherlands.” American Journal of Political Science40 (1): 231–60.
57.
WlezienChristopherFranklinMarkTwiggsDaniel. 1997. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity.” Political Behavior19: 7–17.
58.
WrightJohn R.2012. “Unemployment and the Democratic Electoral Advantage.” American Political Science Review106 (4): 685–702.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
