Previous work on political tolerance has overwhelmingly focused on established democracies. Consequently, our knowledge continues to be limited with regard to the drivers of tolerance in less democratic transitional and nondemocratic settings. In this paper, we examine what could best promote tolerance of least-favored political groups in such contexts. We use a survey experiment in Egypt to test competing theories through exposing respondents to different primes, emphasizing the importance of tolerance on the basis of religious, economic, or government endorsements. Respondents were then asked questions to gauge their tolerance levels toward their least-favored group. We control for the level of trust in government, religiosity, interpersonal trust, contact, and political knowledge. Our data show soaring levels of intolerance among Egyptians. However, we found evidence that priming respondents with the economic benefits of having a tolerant society is the most effective way to promote tolerant attitudes, especially among those with lower levels of education and younger age groups. Additionally, our analysis demonstrated that respondents’ level of trust in government has a strong effect on tolerance attitudes.
AdkinsToddLaymanGeoffrey C.CampbellDavid E.GreenJohn C.2013. “Religious Group Cues and Citizen Policy Attitudes in the United States.” Politics and Religion6 (2): 235–63.
3.
AdornoTheodor W.Frenkel-BrunswikElseLevinsonDaniel J.SanfordR. Nevitt. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.
4.
AlesinaAlbertoDrazenAllan. 1991. “Why Are Stabilizations Delayed?” American Economic Review81 (5): 1170–88.
5.
BlaydesLisaLinzerDavid A., 2008. “The Political Economy of Women’s Support for Fundamentalist Islam.” World Politics60 (4): 576–609.
6.
BrewerMarilynn B.1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues55 (3): 429–44.
7.
BrewerMarilynn B.BrownRupert J.1998. “Intergroup Relations.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., Vol. II, edited by GilbertDaniel T.FiskeSusan T.LindzeyGardner, 554–94. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
8.
BullockJohn. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review105 (3): 496–515.
9.
BushSarah SunnJamalAmaney A.2015. “Anti-Americanism, Authoritarian Politics, and Attitudes about Women’s Representation: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Jordan.” International Studies Quarterly59 (1): 34–45.
10.
CampbellDavid E.GreenJohn C.LaymanGeoffrey C.2011. “The Party Faithful: Partisan Images, Candidate Religion, and the Electoral Impact of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science55 (1): 42–58.
11.
CoendersMarcelScheepersPeer. 2003. “The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison.” Political Psychology24 (2): 313–43.
12.
CorstangeDanielMarinovNikolay. 2012. “Taking Sides in Other People’s Elections: The Polarizing Effect of Foreign Intervention.” American Journal of Political Science56 (3): 655–70.
13.
DiamondLarry J.1994. “Toward Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy5 (3): 4–17.
14.
DuchRaymond M.GibsonJames L., 1992. “‘Putting up With’ Fascists in Western Europe: A Comparative, Cross-Level Analysis of Political Tolerance.” The Western Political Quarterly45 (1): 237–73.
15.
DustmannChristianPrestonIan P.2007. “Racial and Economic Factors in Attitudes to Immigration.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy7 (1): Article 62.
16.
EastonDavid. 1975. “A Reassessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science5 (4): 435–37.
17.
EinsteinMarie2006. Rethinking the Relationship Between Religion and Political Tolerance in the US. Political Behaviour, 28(4): 327–348.
GainesBrian J.KuklinskiJames H.QuirkPaul J.2007. “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined.” Political Analysis15 (1): 1–20.
20.
GeddesBarbara. 1990. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics.” Political Analysis2 (1): 131–50.
21.
GibsonJames L.1996. “The Paradoxes of Political Tolerance in Processes of Democratization.” Politikon23 (2): 5–21.
22.
GibsonJames L.1998a. “A Sober Second Thought: An Experiment in Persuading Russians to Tolerate.” American Journal of Political Science42 (3): 819–50.
23.
GibsonJames L.1998b. “Putting up with Fellow Russians: An Analysis of Political Tolerance in the Fledgling Russian Democracy.” Political Research Quarterly51 (2): 37–68.
24.
GibsonJames L.BinghamRichard D.1982. “On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Political Tolerance.” American Political Science Review76 (3): 603–20.
25.
GibsonJames L.GouwsAmanda. 2003. Overcoming Intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in Democratic Persuasion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GolebiowskaEwa A.2014. The Many Faces of Tolerance: Attitudes toward Diversity in Poland. London: Routledge.
27.
GreeneSteven. 2004. “Social Identity Theory and Party Identification.” Social Science Quarterly85 (1): 136–53.
28.
GuériniDanielPetryFrançoisCrêteJean. 2004. “Tolerance, Protest and Democratic Transition: Survey Evidence from 13 Post-Communist Countries.” European Journal of Political Research43 (3): 371–95.
29.
HassanMazen. 2013. “Elections of the People’s Assembly, Egypt 2011/12.” Electoral Studies32: 370–87.
30.
HassanMazenKendallElisabethWhitefieldStephen. 2018. “Between Scylla and Charybdis: Religion, the Military and Support for Democracy among Egyptians, 2011-2014.” Democratization25 (2): 273–92.
31.
HutchisonMarc L.GiblerDouglas M.2007. “Political Tolerance and Territorial Threat: A Cross-National Study.” The Journal of Politics69(1): 128–42.
32.
JacksonLinda A.SullivanLinda. 1987. “The Ingroup Favorability Bias in the Minimal Group Situation.” Journal of Social Psychology127 (5): 461–72.
33.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.StegmaierMary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science3:183–219.
34.
LinzJuan J.StepanAlfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
35.
MarcusGeorge E.SullivanJohn L.Theiss-MorseElizabethStevensDaniel. 2005. “The Emotional Foundation of Political Cognition: The Impact of Extrinsic Anxiety on the Formation of Political Tolerance Judgments.” Political Psychology26 (6): 949–63.
36.
MasoudTarekJamalAmaneyNugentElizabeth. 2016. “Using the Qur’ān to Empower Arab Women? Theory and Experimental Evidence from Egypt.” Comparative Political Studies49 (12): 1555–98.
37.
MutzDiana C.2002. “Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review96 (1): 111–26.
38.
MutzDiana C.2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39.
PeffleyMarkHutchisonMarc L.ShamirMichal. 2015. “The Impact of Persistent Terrorism on Political Tolerance: Israel, 1980 to 2011.” American Political Science Review109 (4): 817–32.
40.
PeffleyMarkKniggePiaHurwitzJon. 2001. “A Multiple Values Model of Political Tolerance.” Political Research Quarterly54 (2): 379–406.
41.
PeffleyMarkRohrschneiderRobert. 2003. “Democratization and Political Tolerance in Seventeen Countries: A Multi-level Model of Democratic Learning.” Political Research Quarterly56 (3): 243–57.
42.
PettigrewThomas F.TroppLinda R.2006. “A Meta-analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90 (5): 751–83.
SeligsonMitchell A.2000. “Toward a Model of Democratic Stability: Political Culture in Central America.” Estudios interdsiciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe11 (2): 5–29.
45.
StennerKaren. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
46.
StoufferSamuel A.1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
47.
SullivanJohn L.PieresonJames E.MarcusGeorge E.1979. “An Alternative Conceptualization of Political Tolerance: Illusory Increases, 1950’s-1970’s.” American Political Science Review73 (3): 233–49.
48.
SullivanJohn L.ShamirMichalWalshPatrickRobertsNigel S.1985. Political Tolerance in Context: Support for Unpopular Minorities in Israel, New Zealand, and the United States. Boulder: Westview Press.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
