According to minimalist theories of democracy, the reason why civil conflicts are less frequent in democracies is that opposition parties can reasonably expect to win the next elections: they then prefer to wait than to rebel. In dictatorships, waiting until the dictator dies is generally much costlier. This waiting time, however, is considerably shortened when the dictator is old. Therefore, the risk of domestic conflict should decrease along with the age of autocratic leaders. Based on 160 countries from 1960 to 2008, our empirical analysis shows that the leader’s age decreases the likelihood of violent rebellion in dictatorships, but not in democratic regimes.
BakDaeheePalmerGlenn. 2010. “Testing the Biden Hypotheses: Leader Tenure, Age, and International Conflict.” Foreign Policy Analysis6 (3): 257–73.
4.
BaturoAlexander. 2016. “Cursus Honorum: Personal Background, Careers and Experience of Political Leaders in Democracy and Dictatorship—New Data and Analyses.” Politics and Governance4 (2): 138–57.
5.
BellSam R.CingranelliDavidMurdieAmandaCaglayanAlper. 2013. “Coercion, Capacity, and Coordination: Predictors of Political Violence.” Conflict Management and Peace Science30 (3): 240–62.
6.
BienenHenryvan de WalleNicolas. 1989. “Time and Power in Africa.” American Political Science Review83 (1): 19–34.
7.
BienenHenryvan de WalleNicolas. 1992. “A Proportional Hazard Model of Leadership Duration.” Journal of Politics54 (3): 685–717.
8.
BuhaugHalvardGleditschKristian S.2008. “Contagion or Confusion? Why Conflicts Cluster in Space.” International Studies Quarterly52 (2): 215–33.
9.
CareySabine. 2007. “Rebellion in Africa: Disaggregating the Effect of Political Regimes.” Journal of Peace Research44 (1): 47–64.
10.
CarterDavid B.SignorinoCurtis S.2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis18 (3): 271–92.
11.
CheibubJosé A.GandhiJenniferVreelandJames R.2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice143 (2): 67–101.
12.
ChoiHyun JinRaleighClionadh. 2015. “Dominant Forms of Conflict in Changing Political Systems.” International Studies Quarterly59:158–71.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers56:563–95.
15.
CollierPaulRohnerDominic. 2008. “Democracy, Development, and Conflict.” Journal of the European Economic Association6 (2–3): 531–40.
16.
EisnerManuel. 2011. “Killing Kings: Patterns of Regicide in Europe, AD 600–1800.” The British Journal of Criminology51 (3): 556–77.
17.
ElbadawiIbrahimSambanisNicholas. 2002. “How Much War Will We See? Explaining the Prevalence of Civil War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (3): 307–44.
18.
FearonJames D.LaitinDavid D.2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review97 (1): 75–90.
19.
FjeldeHanne. 2010. “Generals, Dictators, and Kings: Authoritarian Regimes and Civil Conflict, 1973–2004.” Conflict Management and Peace Science27 (3): 195–218.
20.
FlanaganJames G.1989. “Hierarchy in Simple “Egalitarian” Societies.” Annual Review of Anthropology18:245–66.
21.
GeddesBarbara. 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science2:115–44.
22.
GleditschKristian S.RuggeriAndrea. 2010. “Political Opportunity Structures, Democracy, and Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research47 (3): 299–310.
23.
GleditschNils P.WallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollenbergMargaretaStrandHåvard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615–37.
24.
GoemansH. E.GleditschKristian SkredeChiozzaGiacomo. 2009. “Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders.” Journal of Peace Research46 (2): 269–83.
25.
GoldsmithArthur. 2010. “Mixed Regimes and Political Violence in Africa.” Journal of Modern African Studies48 (3): 413–33.
HaberStephen. 2006. “Authoritarian Government.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, edited by WeingastB.WittmanD., 693–707. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
HegreHåvard. 2014. “Democracy and Armed Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research51 (4): 159–72.
29.
HegreHåvardEllingsenTanjaGatesScottGleditschNils Petter. 2001. “Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992.” American Political Science Review95 (1): 17–33.
30.
HendersonErrolSingerJ. David. 2000. “Civil War in the Post-Colonial World, 1946-92.” Journal of Peace Research37 (3): 275–99.
31.
HorowitzMichael C.McDermottRoseStamAllan C.2005. “Leader Age, Regime Type and Violence International Relations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (5): 661–85.
32.
HorowitzMichael C.StamAllan C.2014. “How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders.” International Organization68 (3): 527–59.
33.
Kendall-TaylorAndreaFrantzErica. 2016. “When Dictators Die.” Journal of Democracy27 (4): 159–71.
34.
Magni BertonRaulPanelSophie. 2017. “Strategic Gerontocracy: Why Nondemocratic Systems Produce Older Leaders.” Public Choice171 (3–4): 409–27.
35.
MedhurstKenneth. (1984) 2016. “Spain’s Evolutionary Pathway from Dictatorship to Democracy.” In The New Mediterranean Democracies: Regime Transition in Spain, Greece and Portugal, edited by Pridham, 30–49Geoffrey. New York: Routledge.
36.
PopperKarl. (1963) 2014. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
37.
PosnerRichard A.1995. Aging and Old Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
PotterPhilip B. K.2007. “Does Experience Matter? American Presidential Experience, Age, and International Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution51 (3): 351–78.
39.
PowellJonathan M.Thyne.Clayton L.2011. “Global Instances of Coups from 1950 to 2010: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research48 (2): 249–59.
40.
PrzeworskiAdam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy’s Value, edited by ShapiroIanHacker-CordonCasiano, 23–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Reynal-QuerolMarta. 2002a. “Ethnicity, Political Systems, and Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (1): 29–54.
42.
Reynal-QuerolMarta. 2002b. “Political Systems, Stability and Civil Wars.” Defence and Peace Economics13 (6): 465–83.
43.
Reynal-QuerolMarta. 2005. “Does Democracy Preempt Civil Wars?” European Journal of Political Economy21:445–65.
44.
RoettRiordan. 1989. “Paraguay after Stroessner.” Foreign Affairs68 (2): 124–42.
45.
RutledgeSteven H.2001. Imperial Inquisitions: Prosecutors and Informants from Tiberius to Domitian. London: Routledge.
46.
SambanisNicholas. 2001. “Do Ethnic and Nonethnic Civil Wars have the Same Causes? A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry (Part 1).” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (3): 259–82.
47.
SchneiderGeraldWiesehomeierNina. 2008. “Rules That Matter: Political Institutions and the Diversity—Conflict Nexus.” Journal of Peace Research45 (2): 183–203.
48.
ShareDonald. 1987. “Transition to Democracy and Transition through Transaction.” Comparative Political Studies19 (1): 525–48.
49.
SimmonsLeo W.1945. The Role of the Aged in Primitive Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
50.
SpencerPaul. 1965. The Samburu: A Study of Gerontocracy in a Nomadic Tribe. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
SvolikMilan W.2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
TeorellJanDahlbergStefanHolmbergSörenRothsteinBoPachonNatalia AlvaradoSvenssonRichard. 2018. “The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, Version Jan18.” The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg. doi:10.18157/QoGStdJan18.
VreelandJames R.2008. “The Effect of Political Regime on Civil War: Unpacking Anocracy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (3): 402–25.
56.
WahmanMichaelTeorellJanHadeniusAxel. 2013. “Authoritarian Regime Types Revisited: Updated Data in Comparative Perspective.” Contemporary Politics19 (1): 19–34.
57.
WernerDennis. 1981. “Gerontocracy among the Mekranoti of Central Brazil.” Anthropological Quarterly54 (1): 15–27.
58.
WilsonMatthew. 2014. “A Discreet Critique of Discrete Regime Type Data.” Comparative Political Studies47 (5): 689–714.
59.
World Bank. 2017. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
