Elite rhetoric is an important aspect of democracy, and understanding why elites alter their rhetorical tone is vital to understanding the nature of public–elite interaction. In this paper, we identify the conditions under which insulated elites respond to public opinion by changing the amount of disagreeable rhetoric they emphasize. We examine Supreme Court opinions and theorize that the majority limits the use of disagreeable rhetoric—language with harsh, unpleasant, or negative connotations—in salient cases with the intention of dulling public opposition to rulings. We test our expectations on two levels, the first using a broad measure of public mood on a large sample of cases and the second using a small sample with issue-specific public opinion measures. We find that as public opinion diverges from the Court, the majority tones down its disagreeable rhetoric, but only in salient cases.
BairdVanessaGanglAmy. 2006. “Shattering the Myth of Legality: The Impact of the Media’s Framing of Supreme Court Procedures on Perceptions of Fairness.” Political Psychology27 (4): 597–614.
2.
BartelsBrandon. 2011. “Choices in Context: How Case-Level Factors Shape the Magnitude of Ideological Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Politics Research39 (1): 142–75.
3.
BlackRyanOwensRyanWedekingJustinWohlfarthPatrick. 2016a. “The Influence of Public Sentiment on Supreme Court Opinion Clarity.” Law & Society Review50 (3): 703–32.
4.
BlackRyanOwensRyanWedekingJustinWohlfarth.Patrick2016b. U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and Their Audiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BlackRyanTreulSarahJohnsonTimothyGoldmanJerry. 2011. “Emotions, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making.” Journal of Politics73 (2): 572–81.
BryanAmandaKromphardtChristopher. 2016. “Public Opinion, Public Support, and Counter-Attitudinal Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal38 (4): 298–317.
8.
BryanAmandaRingsmuthEve. 2016. “Jeremiad or Weapon of Words? The Power of Emotive Language in Supreme Court Dissents.” Journal of Law and Courts4 (1): 159–85.
9.
CasillasChristopherEnnsPeterWohlfarthPatrick. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science55 (1): 74–88.
10.
ClarkTom. 2009. “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science53 (4): 971–89.
11.
ClarkTomLaxJeffreyRiceDouglas. 2015. “Measuring the Salience of Supreme Court Cases.” Journal of Law and Courts3 (1): 37–65.
12.
ClawsonRosaleeStrineHarry “Neil”WaltenburgEric. 2003. “Framing Supreme Court Decisions: The Mainstream versus the Black Press.” Journal of Black Studies33 (6): 784–800.
13.
ClawsonRosaleeWaltenburgEric. 2003. “Support for a Supreme Court Affirmative Action Decision: A Story in Black and White.” American Politics Research31 (3): 251–79.
14.
CrossFrankPennebakerJames. 2014. “The Language of the Roberts Court.” Michigan State Law Review2014:853–94.
15.
DurrRobertMartinAndrewWolbrechtChristina. 2000. “Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science44 (4): 768–76.
16.
EnnsPeterWohlfarthPatrick. 2013. “The Swing Justice.” Journal of Politics75 (4): 1089–1107.
17.
EpsteinLeeKnightJack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
18.
FarganisDion. 2012. “Do Reasons Matter? The Impact of Opinion Content on Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Political Research Quarterly65 (1): 206–16.
19.
FisherLouis. 2014. Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
FranklinCharlesKosakiLiane. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review83 (3): 751–71.
21.
FridkinKimKenneyPatrick. 2011. “Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 307–25.
GibsonJamesCaldeiraGregory. 2009. “Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court.” Journal of Politics71 (2): 429–41.
24.
GibsonJamesLodgeMiltonWoodsonBenjamin. 2014. “Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” Law & Society Review48 (4): 837–66.
25.
GibsonJamesNelsonMichael. 2014. “The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms, and Recent Challenges Thereto.” Annual Review of Political Science10:201–19.
Haider-MarkelDonaldAllenMahalleyJohansenMorgen. 2006. “Understanding Variations in Media Coverage of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: Comparing Media Outlets in Their Coverage of Lawrence v. Texas.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics11 (2): 64–85.
28.
Haider-MarkelDonaldJoslynMark. 2001. “Gun Policy, Opinion, Tragedy, and Blame Attribution: The Conditional Influence of Issue Frames.” Journal of Politics63 (2): 520–43.
29.
HallMatthew. 2014. “The Semiconstrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Fear of Nonimplementation.” American Journal of Political Science58 (2): 352–66.
30.
HumeRobert. 2006. “The Use of Rhetorical Sources by the U.S. Supreme Court.” Law & Society Review40 (4): 817–44.
31.
JohnstonChristopherBartelsBrandon. 2010. “Sensationalism and Sobriety: Differential Media Exposure and Attitudes toward American Courts.” Public Opinion Quarterly74 (2): 260–85.
32.
KrinerDouglasShenFrancis. 2014. “Responding to War on Capitol Hill: Battlefield Casualties, Congressional Response, and Public Support for the War in Iraq.” American Journal of Political Science58 (1): 157–74.
33.
LauRichardSigelmanLeeRovnerIvy. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics69 (4): 1167–1209.
34.
MarshallThomas.1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
35.
MarshallThomas. 2008. Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court. Albany: State University of New York Press.
36.
MartinAndrewQuinnKevin. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis10 (2): 134–53.
37.
McGuireKevinStimsonJames. 2004. “The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences.” Journal of Politics66 (4): 1018–35.
38.
NewmanStephen. 2006. “Political Advocacy on the Supreme Court: The Damaging Rhetoric of Antonin Scalia.” New York Law School Law Review51:907–26.
39.
OwensRyanWedekingJustin. 2011. “Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of Supreme Court Opinions.” Law & Society Review45 (4): 1027–61.
40.
OwensRyanWedekingJustinWohlfarthPatrick. 2013. “How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review.” Journal of Law and Courts1 (1): 35–59.
41.
PennebakerJamesKingLaura. 1999. “Linguistic Styles: Language Use as an Individual Difference.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77 (6): 1296–1312.
42.
PennebakerJamesStoneLori. 2003. “Words of Wisdom: Language Use over the Life Span.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85 (2): 291–301.
43.
RikerWilliam. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
44.
SalamoneMichael. 2014. “Judicial Consensus and Public Opinion: Conditional Response to Supreme Court Majority Size.” Political Research Quarterly67 (2): 320–34.
45.
SmithJoseph. 2014. “Law, Fact, and the Threat of Reversal from Above.” American Politics Research42 (2):226–56.
46.
TannenDeborah. 1993. “What’s in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations.” In Framing in Discourse, edited by TannenDeborah, 14–56. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
UnahIsaacHancockAnge. 2006. “U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making, Case Salience, and the Attitudinal Model.” Law & Policy28 (3): 295–320.
48.
WedekingJustin. 2010. “Supreme Court Litigants and Strategic Framing.” American Journal of Political Science54 (3): 617–31.
49.
WhissellCynthiaFournierMichaelPellandReneMakarecK.1986. “The Dictionary of Affect in Language: Reliability, Validity, and Applications.” Perpetual and Motor Skills62:875–88.
50.
WhitfordAndrewYatesJeff. 2003. “Policy Signals and Executive Governance: Presidential Rhetoric in the War on Drugs.” Journal of Politics65 (4): 995–1012.
51.
ZilisMichael. 2015. The Limits of Legitimacy: Dissenting Opinions, Media Coverage, and Public Responses to Supreme Court Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
52.
ZinkJamesSpriggsJamesScottJohn. 2009. “Courting the Public: The Influence of Decision Attributes on Individuals’ Views of Court Opinions.” Journal of Politics71 (3): 909–25.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
