Latino-majority congressional districts are far more likely to elect Latino representatives to Congress than majority-white districts. However, not all majority-Latino districts do so. This paper addresses this question, and it investigates how the level of influence of political parties and interest groups in majority-Latino districts substantially shapes Latino representation to the US House of Representatives. I rely on five case studies and a dataset of candidates to open congressional races with a Latino population plurality from 2004 to 2014. The evidence indicates that groups and political networks are critical for Latina/o candidate recruitment, the organization of resources in a congressional district, the deployment of campaign resources on behalf of certain candidates, and the eventual success of Latina/o candidates. The findings suggest that Latino descriptive and substantive representation are shaped by the wielding influence of political parties and interest groups.
BaroneMichaelMcCutcheonChuckTrendeSeanKraushaarJoshWassermanDavid T.2013. The Almanac of American Politics 2014. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BarretoMatt A.SeguraGary M.WoodsNathan D.2004. “The Mobilizing Effect of Majority–Minority Districts on Latino Turnout.” American Political Science Review98 (1): 65–75.
3.
BawnKathleenCohenMartinKarolDavidMasketSethHansNoelZallerJohn. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics10 (3): 571–97.
4.
BoatrightRobert G.2013. Getting Primaried: The Changing Politics of Congressional Primary Challenges. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5.
BrantonRegina P.2009. “The Importance of Race and Ethnicity in Congressional Primary Elections.” Political Research Quarterly62 (3): 459–73.
6.
BroockmanDavid E.2014. “Mobilizing Candidates: Political Actors Strategically Shape the Candidate Pool with Personal Appeals.” Journal of Experimental Political Science1 (2): 104–19.
7.
CanonDavid T.1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
CasellasJason P.2007. “Latino Representation in Congress: To What Extent Are Latinos Substantively Represented?” In Latino Politics: Identity, Mobilization and Representation, edited by EspinoR.LealD.MeierK., 219–31. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
9.
CasellasJason P.2011. Latino Representation in State Houses and Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CohenMartinKarolDavidNoelHansZallerJohn. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Crowder-MeyerMelody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender9 (4): 390–413.
12.
DesmaraisBruce A.RajaRaymond J. LaKowalMichael S.2015. “The Fates of Challengers in US House Elections: The Role of Extended Party Networks in Supporting Candidates and Shaping Electoral Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science59 (1): 194–211.
13.
EllisWilliam CurtisWilsonWalter Clark. 2013. “Minority Chairs and Congressional Attention to Minority Issues: The Effect of Descriptive Representation in Positions of Institutional Power.” Social Science Quarterly94 (5): 1207–21.
14.
FoxRichard L.LawlessJennifer L.2010. “If Only They’d Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition.” The Journal of Politics72 (2): 310–26.
15.
GaddieRonald K.BullockCharles S.2000. Elections to Open Seats in the US House: Where the Action Is. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
16.
GrauCraig H.1981. “Competition in State Legislative Primaries.” Legislative Studies Quarterly6 (1): 35–54.
17.
HeroRodney E.TolbertCaroline J.1995. “Latinos and Substantive Representation in the US House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent?” American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 640–52.
18.
HerrnsonPaul S.1988. Party Campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
HerrnsonPaul S.2009. “The Roles of Party Organizations, Party-Connected Committees, and Party Allies in Elections.” The Journal of Politics71 (4): 1207–24.
20.
HerrnsonPaul S.GimpelJames G.1995. “District Conditions and Primary Divisiveness in Congressional Elections.” Political Research Quarterly48 (1): 117–34.
21.
HoganRobert E.2003. “Sources of Competition in State Legislative Primary Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly28 (1): 103–26.
22.
JuenkeEric Gonzalez. 2014. “Ignorance Is Bias: The Effect of Latino Losers on Models of Latino Representation.” American Journal of Political Science58 (3): 593–603.
23.
JuenkeEric GonzalezPreuhsRobert R.2012. “Irreplaceable Legislators? Rethinking Minority Representatives in the New Century.” American Journal of Political Science56 (3): 705–15.
24.
JuenkeEric GonzalezShahParu. 2015. “Not the Usual Story: The Effect of Candidate Supply on Models of Latino Descriptive Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities3 (3): 438–53.
25.
KazeeThomas A.1994. Who Runs for Congress? Ambition, Context, and Candidate Emergence. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
26.
KazeeThomas A.ThornberryMary C.1990. “Where’s the Party? Congressional Candidate Recruitment and American Party Organizations.” Political Research Quarterly43 (1): 61–80.
27.
KerrBrinckMillerWill. 1997. “Latino Representation, It’s Direct and Indirect.” American Journal of Political Science41 (3): 1066–71.
28.
KingGary. 1998. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWittenbergJason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 347–61.
30.
KogerGregoryMasketSethNoelHans. 2009. “Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party Networks.” British Journal of Political Science39 (3): 633–53.
31.
LublinDavid. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32.
LublinDavid. 1999. “Racial Redistricting and African-American Representation: A Critique of ‘Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?’” American Political Science Review93 (1): 183–86.
33.
MaestasCherie D.MaiselL. SandyStoneWalter J.2005. “National Party Efforts to Recruit State Legislators to Run for the US House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly30 (2): 277–300.
34.
MasketSeth. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
35.
MichelsonMelissa R.2010. “Majority-Latino Districts and Latino Political Power.” Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy5:159–75.
36.
MintaMichael D.2009. “Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly34 (2): 193–218.
37.
MoncriefGary F.SquirePeverillJewellMalcolm E.2001. Who Runs for the Legislature?Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
38.
NivenDavid. 1998. The Missing Majority: The Recruitment of Women as State Legislative Candidates. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
39.
OcampoAngela X.RayJohn L.2015. “Many Are Called but Few Are Chosen: The Emergence of Latino Congressional Candidates.” Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association (WPSA) Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, April 2–4.
40.
OcampoAngela X.RayJohn L.2016. “Endorsement Networks and Latino Candidate Recruitment: The National Disconnect.” Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association (WPSA) Annual Meeting, San Diego, March 24–26.
41.
PreuhsRobert R.JuenkeEric Gonzalez. 2011. “Latino US State Legislators in the 1990s: Majority-Minority Districts, Minority Incorporation, and Institutional Position.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly11 (1): 48–75.
42.
RouseStella M.2013. Latinos in the Legislative Process: Interests and Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2002. “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures.” The Journal of Politics64 (3): 791–809.
44.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
45.
SchantzHarvey L.1980. “Contested and Uncontested Primaries for the US House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly5 (4): 545–62.
46.
StrolovitchDara Z.2008. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
WallaceSophia J.2014. “Representing Latinos Examining Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly67 (4): 917–29.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
