Belief in electoral fraud has received heightened attention due to elite rhetoric and controversial voter identification (ID) laws. Using a two-wave national survey administered before and after the 2012 election, we examine the individual-level correlates of belief in a range of election-related conspiracy theories. Our data show that partisanship affects the timing and content of belief in election-related conspiracy theories, but a general disposition toward conspiratorial thinking strongly influences those beliefs. Support for voter ID laws, in contrast, appears to be driven largely by party identification through elite-mass linkages. Our analysis suggests that belief in election fraud is a common and predictable consequence of both underlying conspiratorial thinking and motivated partisan reasoning.
Abalakina-PaapMarinaStephanWalter G.CraigTraciGregoryW. Larry. 1999. “Beliefs in Conspiracies.”Political Psychology20:637–47.
2.
AhlquistJohn S.MayerKenneth R.SimonJackman. 2014. “Alien Abduction and Voter Impersonation in the 2012 U.S. General Election: Evidence from a Survey List Experiment.”Election Law Journal13:460–75.
3.
AlvarezMichaelAtkesonLonna RaeHallThad E.SinclairAndrew. 2011. “The Balance between Preventing Fraud and Ensuring Participation: Attitudes towards Voter Identification in New Mexico.” DSpace@MIT, VTP Working Paper Series No. 106. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96634.
4.
AnsolabehereStephen. 2009. “Effects of Identification Requirements on Voting: Evidence from the Experiences of Voters on Election Day.”Political Science & Politics42:127–30.
5.
AnsolabehereStephen. 2013. “2012 Cooperative congressional election study: common content Release 1. H. University.”Cambridge, MA. http://cces.gov.harvard.edu.
6.
AnsolabehereStephenPersilyNathaniel. 2008. “Vote Fraud in the Eye of the Beholder: The Role of Public Opinion in the Challenge to Voter Identification Requirements.”Harvard Law Review121:1737–74.
7.
AtkesonLonna RaeBryantLisa AnnHallThad E.SaundersKyleAlvarezMichael. 2010. “A New Barrier to Participation: Heterogeneous Application of Voter Identification Policies.”Electoral Studies29:66–73.
8.
AtkesonLonna RaeSaundersKyle L.2007. “The Effect of Election Administration on Voter Confidence: A Local Matter?”Political Science & Politics40:655–60.
9.
BanksAntoine J.HicksHeather M.2016. “Fear and Implicit Racism: Whites’ Support for Voter ID Laws.”Political Psychology37:641–58.
10.
BarnesTiffany D.BeaulieuEmily. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes and Corruption: How Candidates Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud.”Politics & Gender10:365–91.
11.
BarretoMatt A.NunoStephen A.SanchezGabriel R.2009. “The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate: New Evidence from Indiana.”Political Science & Politics42:111–16.
12.
BeaulieuEmily. 2014. “From Voter ID to Party ID: How Political Parties Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud in the U.S.”Electoral Studies35:24–32.
13.
BerinskyAdam. 2009. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
BerinskyAdam. 2017. “Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation.”British Journal of Political Science47:241–62.
15.
BostPreston R.PrunierStephen G.2013. “Rationality in Conspiracy Beliefs: The Role of Perceived Motive.”Psychological Reports113:118–28.
16.
BowlerShaunBrunellThomasDonovanToddGronkePaul. 2015. “Election Administration and Perceptions of Fair Elections.”Electoral Studies38:1–9.
17.
BowlerShaunDonovanTodd. 2016. “A Partisan Model of Electoral Reform: Voter Identification Laws and Confidence in State Elections.”State Politics & Policy Quarterly16 (3): 340–61.
18.
BrothertonRob. 2015. Suspicious Minds: Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
19.
BrothertonRobFrenchChristopher C.PickeringAlan D.2013. “Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale.”Frontiers in Psychology4:279.
20.
BruderMartinHaffkePeterNeaveNickNouripanahNinaImhoffRoland. 2013. “Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories across Cultures: The Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ).”Frontiers in Psychology4:225.
21.
CareyJohn M.NyhanBrendanValentinoBenjaminLiuMingnan. 2016. “An Inflated View of the Facts? How Preferences and Predispositions Shape Conspiracy Beliefs about the Deflategate Scandal.”Research & Politics3:1–9. doi:10.1177/2053168016668671.
22.
CarlinRyan E.LoveGregory J.2016. “Political Competition, Partisanship and Interpersonal Trust in Electoral Democracies.”British Journal of Political Science. Published electronically January22. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000526.
ChaitJonathan. 2007. The Big Con: The True Story of How Washington Got Hoodwinked and Hijacked by Crackpot Economics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
25.
ChristensenRaySchultzThomas J.2014. “Identifying Election Fraud Using Orphan and Low Propensity Voters.”American Politics Research42:311–37.
26.
ClaassenRyan L.EnsleyMichael J.2016. “Motivated Reasoning and Yard-Sign-Stealing Partisans: Mine Is a Likable Rogue, Yours Is a Degenerate Criminal.”Political Behavior38:317–35.
27.
CoadyDavid. 2006. Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate. Burlington: Ashgate.
CrawfordV.Marion County Election Board, 553 (2008).
30.
DagnallNeilDrinkwaterKennethParkerAndrewDenovanAndrewPartonMegan. 2015. “Conspiracy Theory and Cognitive Style: A Worldview.”Frontiers in Psychology6:206.
31.
EinsteinKatherine LevineGlickDavid M.2015. “Do I Think BLS Data Are BS? The Consequences of Conspiracy Theories.”Political Behavior37:679–701.
32.
FogartyBrian J.CurtisJessicaGouzienPatricia FrancesKimballDavid C.VorstEric C.2015. “News Attention to Voter Fraud in the 2008 and 2012 US Elections.”Research & Politics2:1–8.
33.
GrimesDavid Robert. 2016. “On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs.”PLoS ONE11:e0147905.
34.
HajnalZoltanLajevardiNazitaNielsonLindsay. 2017. “Voter Identification Laws and the Suppression of Minority Votes.”The Journal of Politics79 (2): 363–79.
35.
HartmanTodd K.NewmarkAdam J.2012. “Motivated Reasoning, Political Sophistication, and Associations between President Obama and Islam.”Political Science & Politics45:449–55.
36.
HerrnsonPaul S.ClaassenRyan L.NiemiRichard G.PattersonKelly D.2013. “Exceeding Expectations? Determinants of Satisfaction with the Voting Process in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.”The Journal of Politics75:451–63.
37.
HicksWilliam D.McKeeSeth C.SellersMitchell D.SmithDaniel A.2015. “A Principle or a Strategy? Voter Identification Laws and Partisan Competition in the American States.”Political Research Quarterly68:18–33.
38.
HofstadterRichard. 1964. The Paranoid Style in American Politics, and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
39.
ImhoffRolandBruderMartin. 2014. “Speaking (Un-)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as a Generalised Political Attitude.”European Journal of Personality28:25–43.
40.
JolleyDanielDouglasKaren. 2014. “The Effects of Anti-vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions.”PLoS ONE9:e89177.
41.
KahanDan. 2010. “Fixing the Communications Failure.”Nature463:296–97.
42.
KeeleyBrian. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.”Journal of Philosophy96:109–26.
LantianAnthonyMullerDominiqueNurraCécileDouglasKaren. 2016. “Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Validation of a French and English Single-Item Scale.”International Review of Social Psychology29:1–14.
45.
LeighleyJan E.NaglerJonathan. 2013. Who Votes Now? Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
46.
LewandowskyStephanGignacGilles E.OberauerKlaus. 2013. “The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science.”PLoS ONE8:e75637.
47.
LodgeMiltonTaberCharles S.2013. The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
LordCharles G.RossLeeLepperMark R.1979. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37:2098–109.
49.
McCloskyHerbertChongDennis. 1985. “Similarities and Differences between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals.”British Journal of Political Science15:329–63.
50.
MillerJoanne M.SaundersKyle L.FarhartChristina E.2016. “Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust.”American Journal of Political Science60:824–44.
51.
MinniteLorraine C.2010. The Myth of Voter Fraud. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
52.
NyhanBrendanDickinsonFranklinDuddingSashaDylgjeriEnxhiNeileyEricPulleritsChristopherSeogMinaeSimpsonAndySzilagyiHeatherWalmsleyColin. 2016. “Classified or Coverup? The Effect of Redactions on Conspiracy Theory Beliefs.”Journal of Experimental Political Science109–23.
53.
NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.”Political Behavior32:303–30.
54.
OliverEricWoodThomas. 2014. “Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion.”American Journal of Political Science58:952–66.
55.
OvertonSpencer. 2007. “Voter Identification.”Michigan Law Review105:631–81.
56.
RadnitzScottUnderwoodPatrick. 2017. “Is Belief in Conspiracy Theories Pathological? A Survey Experiment on the Cognitive Roots of Extreme Suspicion.”British Journal of Political Science47:113–29.
57.
SherifMuzaferHarveyO. J.WhiteB. JackHoodWilliam R.SherifCarolyn W.1961. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
SunsteinCass R.VermeuleAdrian. 2009. “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.”Journal of Political Philosophy17:202–27.
60.
SuttonRobbieDouglasKaren. 2014. “Examining the Monological Nature of Conspiracy Theories.” In Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People Are Suspicious of Their Leaders, edited by ProoijenJan-Willem vanLangePaul van, 254–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SvolikMilanRundlettAshlea. 2016. “Deliver the Vote! Micromotives and Macrobehavior in Electoral Fraud.”American Political Science Review110:180–97.
62.
SwamiVirenColesRebeccaStiegerStefanPietschnigJakobFurnhamAdrianRehimSherryVoracekMartin. 2011. “Conspiracist Ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a Monological Belief System and Associations between Individual Psychological Differences and Real-World and Fictitious Conspiracy Theories.”British Journal of Psychology102:443–63.
63.
UdaniAdrianoKimballDavid C.2015. “Are Voter Fraud Beliefs and Extension of Immigrant Resentment?”http://ssrn.com/abstract=2595274.
64.
UscinskiJoseph E.KlofstadCaseyAtkinsonMatthew. 2016. “Why Do People Believe in Conspiracy Theories? The Role of Informational Cues and Predispositions.”Political Research Quarterly69:57–71.
65.
UscinskiJoseph E.ParentJoseph M.2014. American Conspiracy Theories. New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
van der TempelJanAlcockJames E.2015. “Relationships between Conspiracy Mentality, Hyperactive Agency Detection, and Schizotypy: Supernatural Forces at Work?”Personality and Individual Differences82:136–41.
67.
von SpakovskyHans A.2012. “Protecting the Integrity of the Election Process.”Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy11:90–96.
68.
WilsonDavid C.BrewerPaul R.2013. “The Foundations of Public Opinion on Voter ID Laws: Political Predispositions, Racial Resentment, and Information Effects.”Public Opinion Quarterly77:962–84.
69.
WoodMichaelDouglasKarenSuttonRobbie. 2012. “Dead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories.”Social Psychological & Personality Science3 (6): 767–73.
70.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
