Existing literature shows that Republicans in the mass public demonstrate greater ideological inconsistency and value conflict than Democrats. That is, despite a commitment to the conservative label and abstract belief in limited government, Republican identifiers’ substantive policy attitudes are nonetheless divided. Conversely, Democrats, despite registering lower levels of ideological thinking, maintain relatively consistent liberal issue attitudes. Based on theories of coalition formation and elite opinion leadership, we argue that these differences should extend to Democratic and Republican Party activists. Examining surveys of convention delegates from the years 2000 and 2004, we show that Democratic activists’ attitudes are more ideologically constrained than are those of Republican activists. The results support our hypothesis and highlight that some of the inconsistent attitudes evident among mass public party identifiers can be traced to the internal divisions of the major party coalitions themselves.
AbramowitzAlan I.1995. “It’s Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election.”Journal of Politics57 (1): 176–86.
2.
AdamsGreg D.1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.”American Journal of Political Science41 (3): 718–37.
3.
AldrichJohn H.1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of American Political Parties. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
AldrichJohn H.2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
5.
AldrichJohn H.McKelveyRichard D.1977. “A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections.”American Political Science Review71 (1): 111–30.
BarkerDavid C.TinnickJames D.III. 2006. “Competing Visions of Parental Roles and Ideological Constraint.”American Journal of Political Science100 (2): 249–63.
BawnKathleenCohenMartinKarolDavidMasketSethNoelHansZallerJohn. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.”Perspectives on Politics10 (3): 571–97.
12.
BrewerPaul R.2003. “The Shifting Foundations of Public Opinion about Gay Rights.”Journal of Politics65 (4): 1208–20.
13.
CampbellAngusConversePhilip E.MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E.1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15.
CarminesEdward G.WoodsJames. 2002. “The Role of Party Activists in the Evolution of the Abortion Issue.”Political Behavior24 (4): 361–77.
16.
CarseyThomas M.LaymanGeoffrey C.2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.”American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 462–77.
17.
ClaassenRyan L.HightonBenjamin. 2009. “Policy Polarization among Elites and the Significance of Political Awareness in the Mass Public.”Political Research Quarterly62 (3): 538–51.
18.
CohenMartyKarolDavidNoelHansZallerJohn. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
19.
ConversePhilip E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by ApterDavid E., 206–61. New York: Free Press.
20.
DruckmanJames N.PetersonErikSlothuusRune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.”American Political Science Review107 (1): 57–79.
21.
EdelmanMurray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
22.
EllisChristopherStimsonJames A.2012. Ideology in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
FedericoChristopher M.2007. “Expertise, Evaluative Motivation, and the Structure of Citizens’ Ideological Commitments.”Political Psychology28 (5): 535–62.
24.
FedericoChristopher M.HuntCorrie V.2013. “Political Information, Political Involvement, and Reliance on Ideology in Political Evaluation.”Political Behavior35 (1): 89–112.
25.
FedericoChristopher M.SchneiderMonica C.2007. “Political Expertise and the Use of Ideology: Moderating Effects of Evaluative Motivation.”Public Opinion Quarterly71 (2): 221–52.
26.
FeldmanStanley. 1988. “Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values.”American Journal of Political Science32 (2): 416–40.
27.
FeldmanStanleyJohnstonChristopher. 2014. “Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity.”Political Psychology35 (3): 337–58.
28.
FeldmanStanleySteenbergenMarco R.2001. “The Humanitarian Foundation of Public Support for Social Welfare.”American Journal of Political Science45 (3): 658–77.
29.
FeldmanStanleyZallerJohn. 1992. “The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.”American Journal of Political Science36 (1): 268–307.
30.
FreeLloyd A.CantrillHadley. 1967. The Political Beliefs of Americans: A Study of Public Opinion. New York: Simon & Schuster.
31.
FreemanJo. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.”Political Science Quarterly101 (3): 327–56.
32.
GorenPaul. 2012. On Voter Competence. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
GreenJohn C.GuthJames L.1988. “The Christian Right in the Republican Party: The Case of Pat Robertson’s Supporters.”Journal of Politics50 (1): 150–65.
34.
GrossmannMattHopkinsDavid A.2014. “Policymaking in Red and Blue: Asymmetric Partisan Politics and American Governance.”Paper presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September. http://matthewg.org/papers/policyredblue3.pdf.
35.
GrossmannMattHopkinsDavid A.2015a. “Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics.”Perspectives on Politics13 (1): 119–39.
36.
GrossmannMattHopkinsDavid A.2015b. “Party Asymmetry in American Election Campaigns.”Paper presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 16–19. http://www.matthewg.org/partyelection.pdf.
37.
GrossmannMattHopkinsDavid A.2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
HagnerPaul R.PierceJohn C.1982. “Correlative Characteristics of Levels of Conceptualization in the American Public 1956-1976.”Journal of Politics44 (3): 779–807.
39.
HareChristopherPooleKeith T.2014. “The Polarization of Contemporary American Politics.”Polity46 (3): 411–29.
40.
HerreraRichard. 1992. “The Understanding of Ideological Labels by Political Elites: A Research Note.”Western Political Quarterly45 (4): 1021–35.
41.
HerreraRichard. 1995. “The Crosswinds of Change: Sources of Change in the Democratic and Republican Parties.”Political Research Quarterly48 (2): 291–312.
42.
HerreraRichardTaylorMelanie K.1994. “The Structure of Opinion in American Political Parties.”Political Studies42 (4): 676–89.
43.
HillKim QuaileHinton-AndersonAngela. 1995. “Pathways of Representation: A Causal Analysis of Public Opinion-Policy Linkages.”American Journal of Political Science39 (4): 924–35.
44.
HillSeth J.TausanovitchChris. 2015. “A Disconnect in Representation? Comparison of Trends in Congressional and Public Polarization.”Journal of Politics77 (4): 1058–75.
45.
HirschmanAlberto O.1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
46.
JacobyWilliam G.1988. “The Sources of Liberal-Conservative Thinking: Education and Conceptualization.”Political Behavior10 (4): 316–32.
47.
JacobyWilliam G.1995. “The Structure of Ideological Thinking in the American Electorate.”American Journal of Political Science39 (2): 314–35.
48.
JacobyWilliam G.2000. “Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending.”American Journal of Political Science44 (4): 750–67.
49.
JacobyWilliam G.2006. “Value Choices and American Public Opinion.”American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 706–23.
50.
JacobyWilliam G.2014. “Is There a Culture War? Conflicting Value Structures in American Public Opinion.”American Political Science Review108 (4): 754–71.
51.
JenningsM. Kent. 1992. “Ideological Thinking among Mass Publics and Political Elites.”Public Opinion Quarterly56 (4): 419–41.
52.
JewittCaitlin E.GorenPaul. 2015. “Ideological Structure and Consistency in the Age of Polarization.”American Politics Research44 (1): 81–105.
53.
JostJohn T.FedericoChristopher M.NapierJaime L.2009. “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities.”Annual Review of Psychology60:307–37.
54.
KeeleLukeWolakJennifer. 2006. “Value Conflict and Volatility in Party Identification.”British Journal of Political Science36 (4): 671–90.
55.
KinderDonald R.1983. “Diversity and Complexity in American Public Opinion.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by FinifterAda, 389–425. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
56.
KnightKathleen. 1985. “Ideology in the 1980 Election: Ideological Sophistication Does Matter.”Journal of Politics47 (3): 828–53.
57.
LaymanGeoffrey C.CarseyThomas M.1998. “Why Do Party Activists Convert? An Analysis of Individual-Level Change on the Abortion Issue.”Political Research Quarterly51 (3): 723–49.
58.
LaymanGeoffrey C.CarseyThomas M.2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.”American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 786–802.
59.
LaymanGeoffrey C.CarseyThomas M.GreenJohn C.HerreraRichardCoopermanRosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.”American Political Science Review104 (2): 324–46.
60.
LelkesYphtachSnidermanPaul. 2016. “The Ideological Asymmetry of the American Party System.”British Journal of Political Science46: 825–44. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000404.
61.
LenzGabriel. 2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
62.
LuptonRobert N.MyersWilliam M.ThorntonJudd R.2015. “Political Sophistication and the Dimensionality of Elite and Mass Attitudes, 1980–2004.”Journal of Politics74 (2): 368–80.
63.
LuskinRobert C.1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.”American Journal of Political Science31 (4): 856–99.
64.
McCloskeyHerbertZallerJohn. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
65.
MillerWarren E.1988. Without Consent: Mass-Elite Linkages in Presidential Politics. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
66.
MillerWarren E.JenningsM. Kent. 1986. Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
67.
NoelHans. 2012. “The Coalition Merchants: The Ideological Roots of the Civil Rights Movement.”Journal of Politics74 (1): 156–73.
68.
NoelHans. 2013a. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69.
NoelHans. 2013b. “Which Long Coalition: The Creation of the Anti-slavery Coalition.”Party Politics19 (6): 962–84.
70.
PeffleyMark A.HurwitzJon. 1985. “A Hierarchical Model of Attitude Constraint.”American Journal of Political Science29 (4): 871–90.
RahnWendy M.1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.”American Journal of Political Science37 (2): 472–96.
76.
RhodesJesse H.JohnsonKelly. 2015. “The Politics of Group Targeting in Presidential Campaign Advertisements: A Preliminary Investigation.”Presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, February 5. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2560998.
77.
SchicklerEricPearsonKathrynFeinsteinBrian D.2010. “Congressional Parties and Civil Rights Politics from 1933 to 1972.”Journal of Politics72 (3): 672–89.
78.
SchifferAdam J.2000. “I’m Not that Liberal: Explaining Conservative Democratic Identification.”Political Behavior22 (4): 293–310.
79.
SchneiderSaundra K.JacobyWilliam G.2005. “Elite Discourse and American Public Opinion: The Case of Welfare Spending.”Political Research Quarterly58 (3): 367–79.
StimsonJames A.1975. “Belief Systems: Constraint, Complexity, and the 1972 Election.”American Journal of Political Science19 (3): 393–417.
82.
StimsonJames A.2004. Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
83.
StoneDeborah. 2001. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. 3rd ed.New York: W.W. Norton.
84.
TreierShawnHillygusD. Sunshine. 2009. “The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate.”Public Opinion Quarterly74 (4): 679–703.
85.
WilliamsonVanessaSkocpolThedaCogginJohn. 2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.”Perspectives on Politics9 (1): 25–43.
86.
WyckoffMikel L.1980. “Belief System Constraint and Policy Voting: A Test of the Unidimensional Consistency Model.”Political Behavior2 (2): 115–46.
87.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
