Local governments prioritize spending on various types and levels of public services. Although scholars have shown that citizen preferences and institutional factors, such as economic, political, and legal arrangements, play a role in resource allocation, scholars have not systematically examined the impact of local elected officials’ own ideological preferences on service prioritization. A better understanding of the impact of personal ideology on local government resource allocation is needed as this provision of funds has implications for democratic governance and responsiveness. We develop and use a novel measure of local elected official ideology using a 2011 survey of California local elected officials to test the hypothesis that local decision-maker ideology affects attitudes on funding-specific service categories. We find evidence that local elected officials’ attitudes toward service reductions are associated with both their own individual ideology, measured on the conservative–liberal spectrum, and the ideology of their constituents.
AchenChristopher H.1978. “Measuring Representation.”American Journal of Political Science22 (3): 475–510.
2.
AndersonChristopher J.SingerMatthew M.2008. “The Sensitive Left and the Impervious Right: Multilevel Models and the Politics of Inequality, Ideology, and Legitimacy in Europe.”Comparative Political Studies41 (4/5): 564–99.
3.
BafumiJosephHerronMichael C.2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress.”American Political Science Review104 (3): 519–42.
4.
BakerFrank B.2001. The Basics of Item Response Theory. College Park, MD: Epic Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
5.
BarnettJeffrey L.SheckellsCindy L.PetersonScottTydingsElizabeth M.2014. “State and Local Government Finances Summary: 2012.” No. G12-CG-ALFIN. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. http://www2.census.gov/govs/local/summary_report.pdf.
6.
BeckettKatherine. 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BerryFrances Stokes. 1994. “Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic Planning.”Public Administration Review54:322–30.
8.
BertelliAnthony M.GroseChristian R.2006. “The Spatial Model and the Senate Trial of President Clinton.”American Politics Research34 (4): 535–59.
9.
BertelliAnthony M.GroseChristian R.2009. “Secretaries of Pork? A New Theory of Distributive Public Policy.”The Journal of Politics71 (3): 926–45.
10.
BertelliAnthony M.GroseChristian R.2011. “The Lengthened Shadow of Another Institution? Ideal Point Estimates for the Executive Branch and Congress.”American Journal of Political Science55 (4): 767–81.
11.
BlaisAndreBlakeDonaldDionStephane. 1993. “Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies.”American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 40–62.
12.
BonicaA.2013. “Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace.”American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 294–311.
13.
BuchananJames M.1971. “Principles of Urban Fiscal Strategy.”Public Choice11 (1): 1–16.
14.
ChoiSang OkBaeSang-SeokFeiockRichard. 2010. “County Limits: Policy Types and Expenditure Priorities.”The American Review of Public Administration40 (1): 29–45.
15.
ClingermayerJames C.FeiockRichard C.2001. Institutional Constraints and Policy Choice: An Exploration of Local Governance. Albany: State University of New York Press.
16.
ClintonJoshua D.2006. “Representation in Congress: Constituents and Roll Calls in the 106th House.”The Journal of Politics68 (2): 397–409.
17.
ClintonJoshua D.BertelliAnthonyGroseChristian R.LewisDavid E.NixonDavid C.2012. “Separated Powers in the United States: The Ideology of Agencies, Presidents, and Congress.”American Journal of Political Science56 (2): 341–54.
18.
ClintonJoshua D.JackmanSimonRiversDouglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.”American Political Science Review98 (2): 355–70.
19.
CookCarrie L.LaneJodi. 2009. “The Place of Public Fear in Sentencing and Correctional Policy.”Journal of Criminal Justice37 (6): 586–95.
20.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew D.1986. “Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game.”The Journal of Politics48 (2): 370–89.
21.
CrawMichael. 2010. “Deciding to Provide: Local Decisions on Providing Social Welfare.”American Journal of Political Science54 (4): 906–20.
22.
DahlRobert A.1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
23.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
24.
EnnsPeter K.WlezienChristopher. 2011. Who Gets Represented?New York: Russell Sage.
25.
EriksonRobert S.TedinKent L.2003. American Public Opinion. 6th ed.New York: Longman.
26.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
EvansGeoffreyHeathAnthonyLalljeeMansur. 1996. “Measuring Left-Right and Libertarian-Conservative Attitudes in the British Electorate.”British Journal of Sociology47:93–112.
28.
EzrowLawrenceDe VriesCatherineSteenbergenMarcoEdwardsErica. 2011. “Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position or to Their Supporters?”Party Politics17 (3): 275–301.
29.
FeatherN. T.1985. “Attitudes, Values, and Attributions: Explanations of Unemployment.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48 (4): 876–89.
30.
FedericoChristopher M.SidaniusJim. 2002. “Sophistication and the Antecedents of Whites’ Racial Policy Attitudes: Racism, Ideology, and Affirmative Action in America.”Public Opinion Quarterly66:145–76.
31.
GreenbergDavid F.WestValerie. 2001. “State Prison Populations and their Growth, 1971–1991.”Criminology39 (3): 615–54.
32.
HajnalZoltan L.TrounstineJessica. 2010. “Who or What Governs? The Effects of Economics, Politics, Institutions, and Needs on Local Spending.”American Politics Research20 (10): 1–34.
33.
JacobsDavidHelmsRonald E.1996. “Toward a Political Model of Incarceration: A Time-Series Examination of Multiple Explanations for Prison Admission Rates.”American Journal of Sociology102:323–57.
34.
JacobsDavidHelmsRonald E.2001. “Toward a Political Sociology of Punishment: Politics and Changes in the Incarcerated Population.”Social Science Research30 (2): 171–94.
35.
JohnsonFredaRoswickDiana L.1991. “Local Fiscal Capacity.” In Local Government Finance: Concepts and Practices, edited by PetersonJohn E.StrachotaDennis R., 177–98. Chicago: Government Finance Officers Association.
36.
JostJohn T.BanajiMahzarin R.NosekBrian A.2004. “A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo.”Political psychology25 (6): 881–919.
37.
JostJohn T.GlaserJackKruglanskiArie W.SullowayFrank J.2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.”Psychology Bulletin129:339–75.
38.
KangShin-GooPowellG. Bingham. 2010. “Representation and Policy Responsiveness: The Median Voter, Election Rules, and Redistributive Welfare Spending.”The Journal of Politics72 (4): 1014–28.
39.
KantorPaul. 1995. The Dependent City Revisited: The Political Economy of Urban Development and Social Policy. Boulder: Westview Press.
40.
KluegelJames R.1990. “Trends in Whites’ Explanations of the Black-White Gap in Socioeconomic Status, 1977-1989.”American Sociological Review55 (4): 512–25.
41.
KluegelJames R.SmithElliott R.1986. Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
42.
KousserThadLewisJeffrey B.MasketSeth E.2007. “Ideological Adaptation? The Survival Instinct of Threatened Legislators.”The Journal of Politics69 (3): 828–43.
43.
KrebsTimothy B.1998. “The Determinants of Candidates’ Vote Share and the Advantages of Incumbency in City Council Elections.”American Journal of Political Science42:921–35.
44.
LienPei-Te. 1998. “Does the Gender Gap in Political Attitudes and Behavior Vary across Racial Groups?”Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 869–94.
45.
LongoriaThomasJr.1999. “The Impact of Office on Cross-Racial Voting: Evidence from the 1996 Milwaukee Mayoral Election.”Urban Affairs Review34:596–603.
46.
LubellMarkFeiockRichard C.RamirezEdgar E.2009. “Local Institutions and the Politics of Urban Growth.”American Journal of Political Science53 (3): 649–65.
47.
MartinAndrew D.QuinnKevin M.2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the US Supreme Court, 1953–1999.”Political Analysis10 (2): 134–153.
48.
MasonDyana P.2015. “Advocacy in Nonprofit Organizations: A Leadership Perspective.”Nonprofit Policy Forum6 (3): 297–324. doi:10.1515/npf-2014-0036.
49.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
50.
McCabeBarbaraFeiockRichard C.2005. “Nested Levels of Institutions State Rules and City Property Taxes.”Urban Affairs Review40 (5): 634–54.
51.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2001. “The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress.”American Political Science Review95 (3): 673–87.
52.
McDermottMonika L.1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.”Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 895–918.
53.
McDonaldMichael D.BudgeIan. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
McKayAmy. 2008. “A Simple Way of Estimating Interest Group Ideology.”Public Choice136 (1/2): 69–86.
55.
McKayAmy. 2010. “The Effects of Interest Groups’ Ideology on Their PAC and Lobbying Expenditures.”Business and Politics12 (2): 1–23.
56.
MeierKennethStewartJosephEnglandRobert E.1991. “The Politics of Bureaucratic Discretion: Educational Access as an Urban Service.”American Journal of Political Science35 (1): 155–77.
57.
MorganDavid R.WatsonSheilah S.1995. “The Effects of Mayoral Power on Urban Fiscal Policy.”Policy Studies Journal23 (2): 231–43.
58.
NosekBrian A.BanajiMahzarin R.JostJohn T.2009. “The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes.” In Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification, edited by JostJohn T.KayAaron C.ThorisdottirHulda, 480–506. New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
PiersonChris. 2006. Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare. Cambridge: Polity.
61.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
63.
PowellG. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
64.
RamakrishnanS. KarthickBaldassareMark. 2004. The Ties That Bind: Changing Demographics and Civic Engagement in California. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
65.
SchaffnerBrianStrebMatthewWrightGerald. 2001. “Teams without Uniforms: The Nonpartisan Ballot in State and Local Elections.”Political Research Quarterly54 (1): 7–30.
66.
SkitkaLinda J.1999. “Ideological and Attributional Boundaries on Public Compassion: Reactions to Individuals and Communities Affected by a Natural Disaster.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25 (7): 793–808.
67.
SkitkaLinda J.MullenElizabethGriffinThomasHutchinsonSusanChamberlinBrian. 2002. “Dispositions, Scripts, or Motivated Correction? Understanding Ideological Differences in Explanations for Social Problems.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83 (2): 470–87.
68.
SkitkaLinda J.TetlockPhilip E.1993. “Providing Public Assistance: Cognitive and Motivational Processes Underlying Liberal and Conservative Policy Preferences.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65 (6): 1205–23.
69.
SquirePeverillSmithEric. 1988. “The Effect of Partisan Information on Voters in Nonpartisan Elections.”The Journal of Politics50:169–79.
70.
StuckyThomas D.HeimerKarenLangJoseph B.2007. “A Bigger Piece of the Pie? State Corrections Spending and the Politics of Social Order.”Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency44 (1): 91–123.
71.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.”American Political Science Review108 (3): 605–41.
72.
TieboutCharles. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.”Journal of Political Economy64:416–24.
VanderleeuwJames M.1990. “A City in Transition: The Impact of Changing Racial Composition on Voting Behavior.”Social Science Quarterly71:326–38.
75.
van der LindenWim J.HambletonRonald K.1997. “Item Response Theory: Brief History, Common Models, and Extensions.” In Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, edited by van der LindenWim J.HambletonRonald K., 1–28. New York: Springer.
WhiteHalbert. 1982. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models.”Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society50 (1): 1.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
