In this paper, we engage with the emerging literature that studies the support for populism by means of attitudes among the public at large. More specifically, our paper has two objectives. First, we extend recent research by Akkerman et al. by showing that their measure performs rather well in a context that differs from the one it was originally formulated in. Data from Flanders (the Dutch speaking part of Belgium, N = 1,577) also demonstrate that the support for populism can be empirically distinguished from feelings of lack of external political efficacy. Second, this is one of the first studies that assess who supports populism and why they do so. We show that populism is embedded in deep feelings of discontent, not only with politics but also with societal life in general. Moreover, we demonstrate that populism is strongest supported by stigmatized groups who face difficulties in finding a positive social identity. In the conclusion, we discuss the implications of our findings.
AchterbergPeterHoutmanDick. 2009. “Ideologically Illogical? Why Do the Lower-Educated Dutch Display so Little Value Coherence?”Social Forces87:1649–70.
2.
AkkermanAgnesMuddeCasZasloveAndrej. 2014. “How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies47:1324–53.
3.
ArzheimerKai. 2009. “Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980-2002.” American Political Science Review53:259–75.
4.
AslanidisParis. 2015. “Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and a New Perspective”Political Studies. Published electronically October5. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12224
5.
AxelrodRobert. 1967. “The Structure of Public Opinion on Policy Issues.” The Public Opinion Quarterly31:51–60.
6.
BornschierSimon. 2010. Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7.
BovensMarkWilleAnchrit. 2010. “The Education Gap in Political Participation and Its Political Consequences.” Acta Politica45:393–422.
8.
CampbellRosieCowleyPhilip. 2014. “What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment.” Political Studies62:745–65.
9.
CanovanMargeret. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies47:2–16.
10.
CentersRichard. 1961. The Psychology of Social Classes: A Study of Class Consciousness. New York: Russell & Russell.
11.
CofféHildeMichelsAnk. 2014. “Education and Support for Representative, Direct and Stealth Democracy.” Electoral Studies35:1–11.
12.
de LangeSarahAkkermanTjitski. 2012. “Populist Parties in Belgium: A Case of Hegemonic Liberal Democracy?” In Populism in Europe and the Americas, edited by MuddeCasKaltwasserCristobal, 27–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
de la TorreCarlos, ed. 2015. The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
14.
DenchGeoff. 2006. The Rise and Rise of Meritocracy. Oxford: Blackwell.
15.
ElchardusMarkSpruytBram. 2012. “The Contemporary Contradictions of Egalitarianism: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between the Old and the New Left/Right Alignments.” European Political Science Review4:217–39.
16.
ElchardusMarkSpruytBram. 2016. “Populism, Persistent Republicanism and Declinism: An Empirical Analysis of Populism as a Thin Ideology.” Government & Opposition51:111–33.
HawkinsKirk. 2009. “Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies42:1040–67.
19.
HawkinsKirkRidingScottMuddeCas. 2012. “Measuring Populist Attitudes.”Political Concepts Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series55:1–35.
20.
HirschmanAlberto. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21.
HoggMichael. 2000. “Subjective Uncertainty Reduction through Self-Categorization: A Motivational Theory of Social Identity Processes.” European Review of Social Psychology11:223–55.
22.
HoggMichael. 2005. “Uncertainty, Social Identity, and Ideology.” In Advances in Group Processes, edited by ThyeShaneLawlerEdward, 203–29. New York: Elsevier.
23.
JagersJanWalgraveStefaan. 2007. “Populism as Political Communications Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research46:319–45.
24.
KaltwasserChristobal. 2015. “Explaining the Emergence of Populism in Europe and the Americas.” In The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives, edited by de La TorreCarlos, 189-227. Kentucky: University Press.
25.
KriesiHanspeter. 2014. “The Populist Challenge”West European Politics37:361–78.
26.
KriesiHanspeterGrandeEdgarLachatRomainDolezalMartinBornschierSimonTimotheosFrey. 2006. “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared.” European Journal of Political Research45:921–56.
27.
KriesiHanspeterPappasTakis, eds. 2015. European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Studies.
28.
LaclauErnesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.
29.
LaurijssenIlseSpruytBram. 2014. “Not for People Like Us? A Six-Year Panel Study of the Mutual Relationship between Feelings of Relative Deprivation and Occupational Status among Young Adults in Flanders.” Social Indicators Research124:617–35.
30.
LeachColinVan ZomerenMartijnZebelSvenVliekMichael L. W.PennekampSjoerd F.DoosjeBertjanOuwerkerkJaap W.RussellSpears. 2008. “Group-Level Self-Definition and Self-Investment: A Hierarchical (Multicomponent) Model of In-Group Identification.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95:144–65.
31.
MairPeter. 2013. Ruling the Void. London: Verso.
32.
MényYvesSurelYves. 2002. Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
33.
MorrellMichael. 2003. “Survey and Experimental Evidence for a Reliable and Valid Measure of Internal Political Efficacy.” The Public Opinion Quarterly67:589–602.
34.
MuddeCas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government & Opposition39:541–63.
35.
MuddeCas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
MuddeCasKaltwasserCristobal R.2012. “Populism and (Liberal) Democracy: A Framework for Analysis.” In Populism in Europe and the Americas, edited by MuddeCasKaltwasserChristobal R., 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
OeschDaniel. 2008. “Explaining Workers’ Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway and Switzerland.” International Political Science Review29:349–373.
38.
PanizzaFrancesco. 2005. “Introduction: Populism and the Mirror of Democracy.” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by PanizzaFranceso, 1–31. London: Verso.
39.
PauwelsTeun. 2010. “Explaining the Success of Neo-Liberal Populist Parties: The Case of Lijst Dedecker in Belgium.” Political Studies58:1009–29.
40.
PauwelsTeun. 2011. “Populisme in Vlaanderen [Populism in Flanders]”Samenleving en Politiek18:4–15.
41.
RooduijnMatthijs. 2014a. “The Nucleus of Populism: In Search of the Lowest Common Denominator.” Government & Opposition49:573–99.
42.
RooduijnMatthijs. 2014b. “Vox Populismus: A Populist Radical Right Attitude among the Public?”Nations and Nationalism20:80–92.
43.
RooduijnMatthijsPauwelsTeun. 2011. “Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis.” West European Politics34:1272–83.
44.
SpruytBram. 2014. “An Asymmetric Group Relation? An Investigation into Public Perceptions of Education-Based Groups and the Support for Populism.” Acta Politica49:123–43.
45.
SpruytBramToonKuppens. 2015. “Warm, Cold, Competent or Incompetent? An Empirical Assessment of Public Perceptions of the Higher and Less Educated.” Current Sociology63:1058–77.
46.
SroleLeo. 1956. “Social Integration and Certain Corollaries: An Exploratory Study.” American Sociological Review21:709–16.
47.
StanleyBen. 2008. “The Thin Ideology of Populism.” Journal of Political Ideologies13:95–110.
48.
StanleyBen. 2011. “Populism, Nationalism, or National Populism? An Analysis of Slovak Voting Behaviour at the 2010 Parliamentary Election.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies44:257–70.
49.
StubagerRune. 2009. “Education-Based Group Identity and Consciousness in the Authoritarian-Libertarian Value Conflict.” European Journal of Political Research48:204–33.
50.
TaggartPaul. 2002. “Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by MényYvesSurelYves, 62–80. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
51.
Van der BrugWouter. 2003. “How the LPF Fuelled Discontent: Empirical Tests of Explanations of LPF Support.” Acta Politica38:89–106.
52.
Van KesselStijn. 2014. “The Populist Cat-Dog: Applying the Concept of Populism to Contemporary European Party Systems.” Journal of Political Ideologies19:99–110.
53.
Van KesselStijn. 2015. Populist Parties in Europe. Agents of Discontent?Basingstoke: Palgrave.
54.
ZallerJohn1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
