Although Connolly appears to be introducing Darwin and biological history into political science, he has instead returned to the roots of the discipline, working and reworking the foundations of politics as a disciplinary locus. Biological thought underpins the history of political science, a fact too easily forgotten by contemporary practitioners.
ArendtHannah. 1977. “The Conquest of Space and the Stature of Man.” In Between Past and Future, 265–80. New York: Penguin.
2.
BergsonHenri. 1944. Creative Evolution. Translated by MitchellArthur. New York: Random House.
3.
CampbellJ. A.LivingstoneDavid N.1983. “Neo-Lamarckism and the Development of Geography in the United States and Great Britain.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series8 (3): 267–94.
4.
ConnollyWilliam. 2002. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
ConnollyWilliam. 2013. The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism. Durham: Duke University Press.
6.
ConnollyWilliam. IN PRESS. “Species Evolution and Cultural Freedom.” Political Research Quarterly.
7.
DeleuzeGilles. 1986. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Translated by TomlinsonHughHabberjamBarbara. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
DeleuzeGilles. 1989. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Translated by TomlinsonHughGaletaRobert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
DeleuzeGilles. 1991. Bergsonism. Translated by TomlinsonHughHabberjamBarbara. New York: Zone Books.
10.
FairlieJohn. 1930. “Political Developments and Tendencies.” The American Political Science Review24 (1): 1–15.
11.
FreudSigmund. 1957. “Instincts and Their Vicissitudes.” In Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 14. Translated by StracheyJ., 111–40. London: Hogarth Press.
12.
GissisSnaitJablonkaEva, eds. 2011. Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
13.
GoodnowFrank J.1904. “The Work of the American Political Science Association.” Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, First Annual Meeting, 35–46.
14.
GouldSteven J.1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
15.
KeyV. O.Jr.1958. “The State of the Discipline.” The American Political Science Review52 (4): 961–71.
16.
MillsJon. 2004. “Clarifications on Trieb: Freud’s Theory of Motivation Reinstated.” Psychoanalytic Psychology21 (4): 673–77.
17.
NietzscheFriedrich. 1989. Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. Translated by KaufmannWalter. New York: Vintage.
18.
SeeleySirRobertJohn. 1896. Introduction to Political Science: Two Series of Lectures. London: Macmillan.
