We investigate strategic voting in proportional representation (PR) systems where parties are organized in pre-electoral coalitions and subject to a vote threshold. We show that such political systems are likely to generate coordination problems among the supporters of a coalition, and we examine voter behavior in this setting using a laboratory experiment with repeated rounds of elections. Our findings suggest that in absence of electoral history, voters cannot coordinate their efforts successfully and are more likely to vote sincerely. However, as history becomes available, the vote threshold induces strategic coordination on parties that performed best in previous elections.
AbramsonPaul R.AldrichJohn H.BlaisAndréDiamondMatthewDiskinAbrahamIndridasonIndridi H.LeeDaniel J.LevineRenan. 2010. “Comparing Strategic Voting under FPTP and PR.” Comparative Political Studies43 (1): 61–90.
2.
Austen-SmithDavidBanksJeffrey. 1988. “Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes.” The American Political Science Review82 (2): 405–22.
3.
BargstedMatias A.KedarOrit. 2009. “Coalition-Targeted Duvergerian Voting: How Expectations Affect Voter Choice under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science53 (2): 307–23.
4.
BlaisAndréAldrichJohn H.IndridasonIndridi H.LevineRenan. 2006. “Do Voters Vote for Government Coalitions? Testing Downs’ Pessimistic Conclusion.” Party Politics12 (6): 691–705.
5.
BlaisAndréGschwendThomas. 2011. “Strategic Desertion across Elections, Parties, and Voters.” In Citizens, Context and Choice: How the Political Context Shapes Electoral Behavior, edited by DaltonRussel J.AndersonChristopher J., 176–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BlaisAndréMassicotteLouis. 2002. “Electoral Systems.” In Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, edited by LeducLawrenceNiemiRichardNorrisPippa, 40–69. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
7.
BlumeAndreasGneezyUri. 2000. “An Experimental Investigation of Optimal Learning in Coordination Games.” Journal of Economic Theory90 (1): 161–72.
8.
BowlerShaunKarpJeffrey A.DonovanTodd. 2010. “Strategic Coalition Voting: Evidence from New Zealand.” Electoral Studies29 (3): 350–57.
9.
CoxGary W.1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CrawfordVincent P.HallerHans. 1990. “Learning How to Cooperate: Optimal Play in Repeated Coordination Games.” Econometrica58 (3): 571–95.
11.
DruckmanJames N.KamCindy. 2011. “Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base.’” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, edited by DruckmanJames N.GreenDonald P.KuklinskiJames H.LupiaAuthur, 70–101. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DuchRaymond M.MayJeffArmstrongDavid A.II. 2010. “Coalition-Directed Voting in Multiparty Democracies.” American Political Science Review104 (4): 698–719.
13.
DuffyJohnHopkinsEd. 2005. “Learning, Information, and Sorting in Market Entry Games: Theory and Evidence.” Games and Economic Behavior51:31–62.
14.
ErisenCengiz. 2013. “Emotions as a Determinant in Turkish Political Behavior.” Turkish Studies14 (1): 115–35.
FredénAnnika. Forthcoming. “Threshold Insurance Voting in PR Systems. A Study of Voters Strategic Behavior in the 2010 Swedish General Election.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties.
GschwendThomas. 2007. “Ticket-Splitting and Strategic Voting under Mixed Electoral Rules: Evidence from Germany.” European Journal of Political Research46 (1): 1–23.
MehtaJudithStarmerChrisSugdenRobert. 1994. “The Nature of Salience: An Experimental Investigation of Pure Coordination Games.” The American Economic Review84 (3): 658–73.
25.
MeyerDonald J.Van HuyckJohn B.BattalioRaymond C.SavingThomas R.1992. “History’s Role in Coordinating Decentralized Allocation Decisions.” Journal of Political Economy100 (2): 292–316.
26.
OsborneMartin J.RubinsteinAriel. 1994. A Course in Game Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
27.
ShikanoSusumuHerrmannMichaelThurnerPaul W.2009. “Strategic Voting under Proportional Representation: Threshold Insurance in German Elections.” West European Politics32 (3): 634–56.
28.
TavitsMargitAnnusTaavi. 2006. “Learning to Make Votes Count: The Role of Democratic Experience.” Electoral Studies25 (1): 72–90.
29.
Van HuyckJohn B.BattalioRaymond C.RankinFrederick W.1997. “On the Origin of Convention: Evidence from Coordination Games.” The Economic Journal107 (442): 576–96.
30.
ViñuelaEnrique GarcíaArtésJoaquín. 2012. “Strategic Voting and Effective Representation Thresholds: Evidence from Three Spanish General Elections.” European Journal of Political Research51 (3): 289–315.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
