This study explores the relationship between electoral participation and income redistribution by way of social transfers, using data from the European Social Survey, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, and the Luxembourg Income Study. It extends previous research by measuring the income skew of turnout rather than using average turnout as a proxy for its income bias. We find that, controlling for a number of other variables, the income skew of turnout is negatively related to transfer redistribution and that electoral participation by those in poverty is positively associated with redistribution in their favor.
American National Election Studies. 2013. “ANES: American National Election Studies.” Ann Arbor: Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan. www.electionstudies.org
BlaisAndréDobrzynskaAgnieszka. 1998. “Turnout in Electoral Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research33:239–61.
4.
BlaisAndréRubensonDaniel. 2013. “The Source of Turnout Decline: New Values or New Contexts?” Comparative Political Studies46:95–117.
5.
BradleyDavidHuberEvelyneMollerStephanieNielsenFrançoisStephensJohn D.2003. “Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies.” World Politics55:193–228.
6.
BradyDavid. 2009. Rich Democracies, Poor People: How Politics Explain Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. 2013. www.cses.org.
8.
DettreyByran J.Schwindt-BayerLeslie A.2009. “Voter Turnout in Presidential Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies42:1317–38.
9.
EndersbyJames W.KrieckhausJonathan T.2008. “Turnout around the Globe: The Influence of Electoral Institutions on National Voter Participation 1972-2000.” Electoral Studies27:601–10.
10.
European Social Survey. 2013. “European Social Survey.” www.Europeansocialsurvey.orgLondon, UK: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University of London.
11.
FranklinMark. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GarfinkelIrwinRainwaterLeeSmeedingTimothy. 2010. Wealth and Welfare States: Is America a Laggard or Leader?Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
GelmanAndrewParkDavidShorBorisBafumiJosephCortinaJeronimo. 2008. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
GrayMarkCaulMiki. 2000. “Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950-1997: The Effects of Declining Electoral Mobilization.” Comparative Political Studies33:1091–122.
15.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). 2013. “Voter Turnout” . www.idea.int/vt/
16.
IversenTorben. 2005. Capitalism, Democracy and Welfare. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
IversenTorbenSoskiceDavid. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others.” American Political Science Review100:165–81.
18.
KarpJeffrey A.BrockingtonDavid. 2005. “Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries.” The Journal of Politics67:825–40.
19.
KatzJonathan N.KatzGabriel. 2010. “Correcting for Survey Misreports Using Auxiliary Information with an Application to Estimating Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science54:815–35.
20.
KenworthyLanePontussonJonas. 2005. “Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries.” Perspectives on Politics3:449–71.
21.
KorpiWalterPalmeJoakim. 2003. “New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975-95.” American Political Science Review97:425–46.
22.
LijphartArend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review91:1–14.
23.
LIS Cross-National Data Center. 2013. Luxembourg Income Study. www.lisdatacenter.org
24.
LupuNoamPontussonJonas. 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution.” American Political Science Review105:316–36.
25.
MahlerVincent A.2010. “Government Inequality Reduction in Comparative Perspective: A Cross-National Analysis of the Developed World.” Polity42:511–41.
26.
McDonaldMichael P.2003. “On the Overreport Bias of the National Election Study Turnout Rate.” Political Analysis11:180–86.
27.
McDonaldMichael P.2007. “The True Electorate: A Cross-Validation of Voter Registration Files and Election Survey Demographics.” Public Opinion Quarterly71:588–602.
PontussonJonasRuedaDavid. 2010. “The Politics of Inequality: Voter Mobilization and Left Parties in Advanced Industrial States.” Comparative Political Studies43:675–705.
34.
QuintelierEllenHoogheMarcMarienSofie. 2011. “The Effect of Compulsory Voting on Turnout Stratification Patterns: A Cross-National Analysis.” International Political Science Review32:396–416.
35.
RosenbergJennifer S.ChenMargaret. 2009. Expanding Democracy: Voter Registration around the World. New York: Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law.
36.
ScerviniFrancesco. 2012. “Empirics of the Median Voter: Democracy, Redistribution and the Role of the Middle Class.” The Journal of Economic Inequality10:529–50.
37.
SchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidneyBradyHenry E.2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
StiglitzJoseph E.2012. The Price of Inequality. New York: W.W. Norton.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
