Previous research has established a link between turnout and the extent to which voters are faced with a “meaningful” partisan choice in elections; this study extends the logic of this argument to perceptions of the “meaningfulness” of electoral conduct. It hypothesizes that perceptions of electoral integrity are positively related to turnout. The empirical analysis to test this hypothesis is based on aggregate-level data from 31 countries, combined with survey results from Module 1 of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems survey project, which includes new and established democracies. Multilevel modeling is employed to control for a variety of individual- and election-level variables that have been found in previous research to influence turnout. The results of the analysis show that perceptions of electoral integrity are indeed positively associated with propensity to vote.
Aldrich, J.H. ( 1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 246-278.
2.
Anderson, C.J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. ( 2005). Losers’ consent: Elections and democratic legitimacy . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
Anderson, C.J., & Guillory, C.A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91, 66-81.
4.
Anderson, C.J., & LoTempio, A.J. (2002). Winning, losing and political trust in America. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 335-351.
5.
Anderson, C.J., & Mendes, S.M. ( 2006). Learning to lose: Election outcomes, democratic experience and political protest potential. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 91-111.
6.
Anderson, C.J., & Tverdova, Y.V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in cotemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 91-109.
7.
Argersinger, P.H. ( 1985-1986). New perspectives on election fraud in the gilded age. Political Science Quarterly, 100, 669-687.
8.
Banducci, S.A., & Karp, J. ( 2003). How elections change the way citizens view the political system: Campaigns, media effects and electoral outcomes in comparative perspective . British Journal of Political Science, 33, 443-467.
9.
Birch, S. ( 2003). Electoral systems and political transformation in postcommunist Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
Birch, S. ( 2007). Electoral systems and electoral misconduct. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 1533-1556.
11.
Birch, S. ( 2008). Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes: A cross-national analysis. Electoral Studies, 27, 305-320.
12.
Blais, A. ( 2000). To vote to not to vote: The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
13.
Blais, A. ( 2006). What affects voter turnout?Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111-125.
14.
Blais, A., & Dobrzynska, A. (1998). Turnout in electoral democracies . European Journal of Political Research, 33, 239-261.
15.
Bowler, S., & Karp, J.A. ( 2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior, 26, 271-287.
16.
Bratton, M. ( 1998). Second elections in Africa. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 51-66.
17.
Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in comparative perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Canache, D., Mondak, J.J., & Seligson, M.A. (2001). Meaning and measurement in cross-national research on satisfaction with democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 506-528.
19.
Clarke, H.D., & Alcock, A.C. ( 1989). National elections and political attitudes: The case of political efficacy. British Journal of Political Science , 19, 551-562.
20.
Cox, G.W., & Kousser, J.M. ( 1981). Turnout and rural corruption: New York as a test Case . American Journal of Political Science, 25, 646-663.
21.
Dalton, R.J. ( 1996). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (2nd ed.). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
22.
Downs, A. ( 1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
23.
Elklit, J., & Reynolds, A. ( 2002). The impact of election administration on the legitimacy of emerging democracies. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics , 40, 86-119.
24.
Elklit, J., & Reynolds, A. ( 2005). A framework for the systematic study of election quality . Democratization, 12(2), 147-162.
25.
Ferejohn, J.A., & Fiorina, M.P. ( 1974). The paradox of not voting: A decision theoretic analysis . American Political Science Review, 68, 525-536.
26.
Festinger, L. ( 1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
Finkel, S.E. ( 1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 891-913.
28.
Finkel, S.E. ( 1987). The effects of participation on political efficacy and political support: Evidence from a West German panel. Journal of Politics, 49, 441-464.
29.
Franklin, M.N. ( 2002). The dynamics of electoral participation. In L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi , & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing democracies 2: New challenges in the study of elections and voting (pp. 148-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Franklin, M.N. ( 2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Geys, B. ( 2006). Voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25, 637-663.
32.
Ginsberg, B., & Weissberg, R. ( 1978). Elections and the mobilization of popular support. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 31-55.
33.
Gray, M., & Caul, M. ( 2000). Declining voter turnout in advanced industrial democracies, 1950 to 1997: The effects of declining group mobilization. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 1091-1122.
34.
Hartlyn, J., & McCoy, J. ( 2006). Observer paradoxes: How to assess electoral manipulation . In A. Schedler (Ed.), Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition (pp. 41-54). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
35.
Hazan, R.Y., & Rahat, G. ( 2000). Representation, electoral reform, and democracy: Theoretical and empirical lessons from the 1996 elections in Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 1310-1336.
36.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. ( 2002). Voter turnout since 1945: A global report. Stockholm, Sweden: Author.
37.
Jackman, R.W., & Miller, R.A. ( 1995). Voter turnout in the industrial democracies during the 1980s. Comparative Political Studies, 27, 467-492.
38.
Karp, J.A., & Banducci, S.A. (2008). Political efficacy and participation in twenty five democracies: How electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 311-334.
39.
Lassen, D.D. ( 2005). The effect of information on voter turnout: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Political Science , 49, 103-118.
40.
Lehoucq, F.E. ( 2002). Can parties police themselves? Electoral governance and democratization. International Political Science Review, 23, 29-46.
41.
Lehoucq, F.E. ( 2003). Electoral fraud: Causes, types, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 233-256.
42.
McCann, J.A., & Domínguez, J.I. (1998). Mexicans react to political fraud and corruption: An assessment of public opinion and voting behavior . Electoral Studies, 17, 483-503.
43.
Milner, H. ( 2002). Civil literacy: How informed citizens make democracy work. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
44.
Mozaffar, S. ( 2002). Patterns of electoral governance in Africa’s emerging democracies. International Political Science Review, 23, 85-101.
45.
Mozaffar, S., & Schedler, A. ( 2002). The comparative study of electoral governance- Introduction . International Political Science Review, 23, 5-27.
46.
Nadeau, R., & Blais, A. ( 1993). Accepting the election outcome: The effect of participation on losers’ consent. British Journal of Political Science , 23, 553-563.
47.
Nagel, J. ( 2004). New Zealand: Reform by (nearly) immaculate design. In J. Colomer (Ed.), Handbook of electoral system choice (pp. 530-543). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
Norris, P. ( 2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Norris, P. ( 2004). Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behaviour . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Oberst, R.C., & Weilage, A. ( 1990). Quantitative tests of electoral fraud: The 1982 Sri Lankan referendum. Corruption and Reform, 5, 49-62.
51.
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. (n.d.). Republic of Belarus presidential election, 9 September 2001, OSCE/ODIHR limited election observation mission final report. Warsaw, Poland: Author.
52.
Pastor, R.A. ( 1999). The role of electoral administration in democratic transitions: Implications for policy and research. Democratization, 6(4), 1-27.
53.
Pérez-Liñán, A. (2001). Neoinstitutional accounts of voter turnout: Moving beyond industrial democracies. Electoral Studies, 20, 281-297.
54.
Powell, G.B., Jr. ( 1982). Contemporary democracies: Participation, stability, and violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
Powell, G.B., Jr. ( 1986). American turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 80, 17-43.
56.
Przeworski, A. ( 1988). Democracy as the contingent outcome of conflicts. In J. Elster & R. Slagstad (Eds.), Constitutionalism and democracy (pp. 59-80). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., & Prosser, B. ( 2004). A user’s guide to MLwiN version 2.0. London, UK: University of London, Institute of Education, Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
58.
Riker, W.H., & Ordeshook, P.C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25-43.
59.
Schaffer, F.C. ( 2007). Lessons learned. In F. C. Schaffer (Ed.), Elections for sale: The causes and consequences of vote buying (pp. 183-200). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
60.
Schaffer, F.C., & Schedler, A. ( 2007). What is vote buying? In F. C. Schaffer (Ed.), Elections for sale: The causes and consequences of vote buying (pp. 17-30). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
61.
Schedler, A. ( 2002a). Elections without democracy: The menu of manipulation . Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36-50.
62.
Schedler, A. ( 2002b). The nested game of democratization by elections. International Political Science Review, 23, 103-122.
63.
Schedler, A. ( 2006). The logic of electoral authoritarianism. In A. Schedler (Ed.), Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition (pp. 1-23). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
64.
Seligson, M.A. ( 2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four LatinAmerican countries. Journal of Politics , 64, 408-433.
65.
Steenbergen, M.R., & Jones, B.S. ( 2002). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 218-237.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
