This research capitalizes on the analytical opportunity created by mandatory retirement provisions to explore the nature of the electoral connection in state supreme courts and to illustrate how changes in institutional context can modify the decisional propensities of political elites and reshape their fundamental roles. Specifically, this work demonstrates that mandatory retirement obviates the representative function by disconnecting key mechanisms through which public preferences are translated into judicial votes: threat conditions that elevate the risk of electoral censure. In state supreme courts, popular votes are in part strategic and result from a complex interaction of goals, institutions, and external pressures.
AbramsonPaul R.AldrichJohn H.RohdeDavid W.2008. Change and Continuity in the 2006 Elections.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
2.
AltJamesEthanBueno de MesquitaShannaRose. 2011. “Disentangling Accountability and Competence in Elections: Evidence from U.S. Term Limits.” Journal of Politics73 (January): 171–86.
3.
BaumLawrenceKleinDavid. 2007. “Voter Responses to High-Visibility Judicial Campaigns.” In Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections, edited by StrebMatthew J., 140–64. New York: New York University Press.
4.
BaumgartnerFrank R.De BoefSuzannaBoydstunAmber. 2008. The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BonneauChris W.2007. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections.” Political Research Quarterly60 (September): 489–99.
6.
BonneauChris W.RiceHeather Marie. 2009. “Impartial Judges? Race, Institutional Context, and U.S. State Supreme Courts.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly9(Winter): 381–403.
7.
BracePaulBoyeaBrent D.2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science52 (April): 360–72.
8.
BracePaulHallMelinda Gann. 1995. “Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American States.” Political Research Quarterly48 (March): 5–29.
9.
BracePaulHallMelinda Gann. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Structure in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics59 (November): 1206–31.
10.
BracePaulHallMelinda Gann. 2001. “‘Haves’ Versus ‘Have Nots’ in State Supreme Courts: Allocating Docket Space and Wins in Power Asymmetric Cases.” Law & Society Review35 (2): 393–413.
11.
BracePaulHallMelinda GannLangerLaura. 2001. “Placing Courts in State Politics.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly1 (Spring): 81–108.
12.
BracePaulLangerLauraHallMelinda Gann. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” Journal of Politics62 (May): 387–413.
13.
BracePaulSims-ButlerKellieArceneauxKevin T.JohnsonMartin. 2002. “Public Opinion in the American States: New Perspectives Using National Survey Data.” American Journal of Political Science46 (January): 173–89.
14.
CaldaroneRichard P.Canes-WroneBrandiceClarkTom S.2009. “Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions.” Journal of Politics71 (April): 560–73.
15.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.MoncriefGary F.2006. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures: A New Survey of the 50 States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly31 (1): 105–36.
16.
DuboisPhilip L.1980. From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability. Austin: University of Texas Press.
17.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.2006. “Public Opinion in the States: A Quarter Century of Change and Stability.” In Public Opinion in State Politics, edited by CohenJeffrey E., 229–53. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
GeyhCharles Gardner. 2003. “Why Judicial Elections Stink.” Ohio State Law Journal64:43–79.
19.
GeyhCharles Gardner. 2008. “Methods of Judicial Selection and Their Impact on Judicial Independence.” Daedalus137 (4): 86–101.
20.
HallMelinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” Journal of Politics49 (November): 1117–24.
21.
HallMelinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics54 (May): 427–46.
22.
HallMelinda Gann. 1995. “Justices as Representatives: Elections and Judicial Politics in the American States.” American Politics Quarterly23 (October): 485–503.
23.
HallMelinda Gann. 2001a. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review95 (June): 315–30.
24.
HallMelinda Gann. 2001b. “Voluntary Retirements from State Supreme Courts: Assessing Democratic Pressures to Relinquish the Bench.” Journal of Politics63 (November): 1112–40.
25.
HallMelinda Gann. 2002. “Assessing the Consequences of Mandatory Retirement on State High Courts: Judicial Behavior under the Condition of the Terminal Term.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
26.
HallMelinda Gann. 2007a. “Competition as Accountability in State Supreme Court Elections.” In Running for Judge, edited by StrebMatthew J., 165–85. New York: New York University Press.
27.
HallMelinda Gann. 2007b. “Voting in State Supreme Court Elections: Competition and Context as Democratic Incentives.” Journal of Politics69 (November): 1147–59.
28.
HallMelinda Gann. 2014. “Televised Attacks and the Incumbency Advantage in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization30: doi:10.1093/jleo/ews033. First published electronically October1, 2012.
29.
HallMelinda GannBonneauChris W.2006. “Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Journal of Political Science50:20–33.
30.
HallMelinda GannBonneauChris W.2008. “Mobilizing Interest: The Effects of Money on Citizen Participation in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Journal of Political Science52 (July): 457–70.
31.
HallMelinda GannBonneauChris W.2013. “Attack Advertising, the White Decision, and Voter Participation in State Supreme Court Elections.” Political Research Quarterly66 (March): 115–26.
32.
HallMelinda GannBracePaul. 1994. “The Vicissitudes of Death by Decree: Forces Influencing Capital Punishment Decision Making in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly75 (March): 136–51.
33.
HallMelinda GannBracePaul. 1996. “Justices’ Responses to Case Facts: An Interactive Model.” American Politics Quarterly24 (April): 237–61.
34.
HoganRobert E.2008. “Policy Responsiveness and Incumbent Reelection in State Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science52 (October): 858–73.
35.
HojnackiMarieBaumLawrence. 1992. “‘New Style’ Judicial Campaigns and Voters: Economic Issues and Union Members in Ohio.” Western Political Quarterly45 (December): 921–48.
36.
JenkinsJeffrey A.NokkenTimothy P.2008. “Partisanship, the Electoral Connection, and Lame-Duck Sessions of Congress.” Journal of Politics70 (April): 450–65.
37.
KritzerHerbert M.2011. “Competitiveness in State Supreme Court Elections, 1946-2009.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies8 (June): 237–59.
38.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E.1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review57 (March): 45–56.
40.
National Center for State Courts. 1996. Survey of State Judicial Fringe Benefits. 2nd ed.Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
41.
NorranderBarbara. 2000. “The Multi-layered Impact of Public Opinion on Capital Punishment Implementation in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly53 (December): 771–93.
42.
RothenbergLawrence S.SandersMitchell S.2000. “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress.” American Journal of Political Science44 (April): 316–25.
43.
SchotlandRoy A.1985. “Elective Judges’ Campaign Financing: Are State Judges’ Robes the Emperor’s Clothes of American Democracy?” Journal of Law and Politics2 (Spring): 57–167.
44.
TomzMichaelWittenbergJasonKingGary. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/.
45.
WrightGerald C.2007. “Do Term Limits Affect Legislative Roll Call Voting? Representation, Polarization, and Participation.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly7 (Fall): 256–80.
