Using American National Election Studies (NES) data from 1952 to 2008—a longer timespan than any analysis to date—we evaluate the leading claims about growing polarization along authoritarian/nonauthoritarian lines and the reasons for that growth. We find authoritarianism’s impact has grown for partisanship and voting but has been consistent for policy attitudes—usually present for “social” and defense issues, but less so for social welfare and foreign policy. This suggests that authoritarianism’s importance is related to strategic politicians advancing issues that touch on the authoritarian/nonauthoritarian divide, and varies across election years.
AbramsonPaul R.AldrichJohn H.Rohde.David W.2007. Change and Continuity in the 2004 and 2006 Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
2.
AdornoTheodor W.Frenkel-BrunswikElseLevinsonDaniel J.Sanford.R. Nevitt1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Row.
3.
AltemeyerRobert. 1988. Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
AltemeyerRobert. 1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BarkerDavid C.TinnickJames D.III. 2006. “Competing Visions of Parental Roles and Ideological Constraint.” American Political Science Review100 (2): 249–63.
6.
CampbellAngusConversePhilipMillerWarrenStokesDonald. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
CampbellDavid E.Monson.J. Quin2008. “The Religion Card: Gay Marriage and the 2004 Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly72 (3): 399–419.
8.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
ConleyPatricia. 2009. “A Mandate for Change? Decisive Victory in a Time of Crisis.” In Winning the Presidency, 2008, edited by CrottyWilliam J., 169–84. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
10.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew Daniel. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
EdsallThomasEdsallMary D.1992. Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
12.
FeldmanStanley. 1988. “Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values.” American Journal of Political Science32:416–40.
13.
FeldmanStanley. 2003. “Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology24 (1): 41–74.
14.
FeldmanStanleyStennerKaren. 1997. “Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology18 (4): 741–70.
15.
GilensMartin. 1996. “‘Race Coding’ and White Opposition to Welfare.” American Political Science Review90:593–604.
16.
GorenPaul. 2004. “Political Sophistication and Policy Reasoning: A Reconsideration.” American Journal of Political Science48 (3): 462–79.
17.
GorenPaul. 2005. “Party Identification and Core Political Values.” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 881–96.
18.
GreenJohn C.2007. The Faith Factor: How Religion Influences the Vote. Westport: Praeger Press.
19.
HetheringtonMarc J.Weiler.Jonathan D.2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HillygusSunshine D.Shields.Todd G.2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyCharlesTaberLahavGallya. 2005. “Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Policies.” American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 593–608.
22.
JanowitzMorrisMarvickDwaine. 1953. “Authoritarianism and Political Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly17 (2): 185–201.
23.
KirkpatrickJeane. 1976. The New Presidential Elite. New York: Russell Sage.
24.
LakoffGeorge. 1996. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
LakoffGeorge. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservative Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
LaneRobert E.1955. “Political Personality and Electoral Choice.” American Political Science Review49 (1): 173–90.
27.
LavineHowardLodgeMiltonFreitasKate. 2005. “Threat, Authoritarianism, and Selective Exposure to Information.” Political Psychology26 (2): 219–44.
28.
LaymanGeoffrey C.2001. The Great Divide. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
LaymanGeoffrey C.Carsey.Thomas M.2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science46:786–802.
30.
LaymanGeoffrey C.CarseyThomas M.GreenJohn C.RichardHerreraRosalynCooperman. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review104 (2): 324–46.
31.
LeeFrances E.2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the US Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
LeegeDavid C.WaldKenneth D.KruegerBrian S.Mueller.Paul D.2002. The Politics of Cultural Difference: Social Change and Voter Mobilization Strategies in the Post-New Deal Period. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1959. “Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism.” American Psychological Review24:482–501.
34.
McTagueMichaelJohnLayman.Geoffrey C.2009. “Religion, Parties, and Voting Behavior: A Political Explanation of Religious Influence.” In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and American Politics, edited by SmidtCorwin E.KellstedtLyman A.GuthJames L.330–70. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
MillerWarren E.Shanks.J. Merrill1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
36.
MockabeeStephen T.2007. “A Question of Authority: Religion and Cultural Conflict in the 2004 Election.” Political Behavior29 (2): 221–48.
37.
PageBenjamin I.JonesCalvin C.1979. “Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote.” American Political Science Review73:1071–90.
38.
StennerKaren. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
