What are the dynamics of partisan conflict in the mass public in the United States? Has this conflict been driven by Republicans moving to the right across a wide range of issues, or have Democrats contributed to this as well? Have these changes been symmetric, occurring for both sides, or asymmetric, occurring for just one side? Understanding how the partisan gaps have widened may shed light on potential prospects for reversing extreme political conflict in public opinion. This paper examines this question with an analysis of opinion trend data over the last 40 years. It includes an original analysis of these trends among racial and ethnic groups. We find that symmetric partisan changes have only occurred among whites. Overall partisan differences have been less for Blacks and Hispanics than for whites.
AbrajanoM.AlvarezR. M. (2010). New faces, new voices: The Hispanic electorate in America. Princeton University Press.
2.
AbramowitzA. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, & American democracy. Yale University Press.
3.
AbramowitzA. (2018). The great alignment: Race, party transformation, and the rise of Donald Trump. Yale University Press.
4.
AbramowitzA. I.WebsterS. W. (2018). Negative partisanship: Why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans. Advances in Political Psychology, 39(Suppl. 1), 119–135.
5.
BafumiJ.ShapiroR. Y. (2009). A new partisan voter. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 1–24.
6.
BinderS. (2014). Polarized we govern. Center for Effective Public Management, The Brookings Institution.
7.
BrownsteinR. (2007). The second civil war: How extreme partisanship has paralyzed Washington and polarized America. The Penguin Press.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J. (2009). Disconnect: The breakdown of representation in American politics. University of Oklahoma.
15.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J.PopeJ. (2011). Culture wars? The myth of polarized America (3rd ed.). Pearson Longman.
16.
GayC. (2014). Knowledge matters: Policy cross-pressures and Black partisanship. Political Behavior, 36(1), 99–124.
17.
GrossmanM.HopkinsD. A. (2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological republicans and group interest democrats. Oxford University Press.
18.
HajnalZ.LeeT. K. (2011). Why Americans don’t join the party: Race, immigration and the failure (of political parties) to engage the electorate. Princeton University Press.
19.
IyengarS.WestwoodS. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 690–707.
20.
JacobsonG. C. (2019). Extreme referendum: Donald Trump and the 2018 midterm elections. Political Science Quarterly, 134, 9–38.
21.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M.HorowitzJ. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110.
22.
LenzG. S. (2012). Follow the leader? How voters respond to politicians’ performance and policies. University of Chicago Press.
23.
LevenduskyM. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and conservatives republicans. University of Chicago Press.
24.
MannT. E.OrnsteinN. J. (2012). It’s even worse than it looks. Basic Books.
25.
MannT. E.OrnsteinN. J. (2016). It’s even worse than it was. Basic Books.
26.
MasonL. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
27.
McCartyN. (2007). The policy effects of political polarization. In PiersonP.SkcopolT. (Eds.), The transformation of American politics: Activist government and the rise of conservatism (pp. 223–255). Princeton University Press.
28.
MutzD. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(19), E4330–E4339.
29.
NieN. H.JunnJ.Stehlik-BarryK. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. University of Chicago Press.
SchaffnerB. F.MacWilliamsM.NtetaT. (2018). Understanding white polarization in the 2016 vote for president: The sobering role of racism and sexism. Political Science Quarterly, 133(1), 9–34.
39.
SchicklerE. (2016). Racial realignment: The transformation of American liberalism, 1932-1965. Princeton University Press.
40.
SearsD. O.DanboldF.ZavalaV. M. (2016) Incorporation of Hispanic immigrants into the American party system. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(3), 182–204.
ShapiroR. Y. (2019, May24). Partisan polarization and ideology in the United States. Keynote Talk at the 30th Anniversary of the Election Study Center, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
43.
ShapiroR. Y.Bloch-ElkonY. (2008). Do the facts speak for themselves? Partisan disagreement as a challenge to democratic competence. Critical Review, 20(1–2), 115–139.
44.
SidesJ.TeslerM.VavreckL. (2018). Identity crisis: The 2016 presidential campaign and the battle for the meaning of America. Princeton University Press.
45.
SmithR. D. (2005). Black Clergy and the Governmental sector during George W. Bush’s Presidency. In SmithR. D.HarrisF. C. (Eds.), Black churches and local politics: Clergy influence, organizational partnerships, and civic empowerment (pp. 187–216). Rowman & Littlefield.
ValentinoN. A.SearsD. O. (2005). Old times there are not forgotten: Race and partisan realignment in the contemporary South. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 672–688.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
