There has been a scarcity of work examining the political consequences of discrete emotions. This article examines the political effects of several emotions—anger, sadness, fear, and enthusiasm. Emotional ads should influence whether voters become politically active. To test this, two experiments were administered. The first examines emotional responses to campaign messages; the second tests whether emotions influence political participation. The results indicate anger is mobilizing, by increasing participatory intentions and factors related to participate. This result is then replicated using ad-tracking data. The findings indicate that emotions are an important factor in studying campaign effects.
AnsolabehereStephenIyengarShanto. 1997. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
2.
AnsolabehereStephenIyengarShantoSimonAdamValentinoNicholas. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?” American Political Science Review88:829-38.
3.
BerkowitzLeonard. 1990. “On the Formation and Regulation of Anger and Aggression: A Cognitive-Neoassociationistic Analysis.” American Psychologist45:494-503.
4.
BerkowitzLeonardHarmon-JonesEddie. 2004. “Toward and Understanding of the Determinants of Anger.” Emotion4:107-30.
5.
BodenhausenGalenSheppardLoriKramerGeoffrey P.1994. “Negative Affect and Social Judgment: The Differential Impact of Anger and Sadness.” European Journal of Social Psychology24:45-62.
6.
BraderTed. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science49:388-405.
7.
BraderTed. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BrooksDeborah. 2006. “The Resilient Voter: Moving toward Closure in the Debate over Negative Campaigning and Turnout.” Journal of Politics68:684-96.
9.
BrooksDeborahGeerJohn. 2007. “Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science51:1-16.
10.
CarverCharlesHarmon-JonesEddie. 2009a. “Anger and Approach: Reply to Watson (2009) and to Tomarken and Wald (2009).” Psychological Bulletin135:215-17.
11.
CarverCharlesHarmon-JonesEddie. 2009b. “Anger Is an Approach-Related Affect: Evidence and Implications.” Psychological Bulletin135:183-204.
12.
ClintonJoshuaLapinskiJohn. 2004. “‘Targeted’ Advertising and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics66:69-96.
13.
DavidsonRichardSchererKlausGoldsmithH. Hill. 2003. Handbook of Affective Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
DienerEdIran-NejadAshgar. 1986. “The Relationship in Experience between Various Types of Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50:1031-38.
15.
EkmanPaulLevensonRobertFriesenWallace. 1983. “Autonomic Nervous System Activity Distinguishes Emotion.” Science221:1208-10.
16.
EllsworthPhoebeSchererKlaus. 2003. “Appraisal Processes in Emotion.” In Handbook of Affective Sciences, edited by DavidsonRichardSchererKlausGoldsmithH. Hill, 572-95. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
FredricksonBarbara. 1998. “What Good are Positive Emotions?” Review of General Psychology2: 300-319.
18.
FredricksonBarbara. 2001. “The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology: The Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions.” American Psychologist56: 218-226.
19.
FreedmanPaulFranzMichaelGoldsteinKenneth. 2004. “Campaign Advertising and Democratic Citizenship.” American Journal of Political Science48:723-41.
20.
FrijdaNicoKuipersPeterter SchureElisabeth. 1989. “Relations among Emotion, Appraisal, and Emotional Action Readiness.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57:212-28.
21.
GeerJohn. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
GoldsteinKennethRivlinJoel. 2007. “Presidential Advertising, 2003–2004 Combined File.” Data set, final release. Madison: University of Wisconsin Advertising Project, Department of Political Science.
23.
Harmon-JonesCindySchmeichelBrandonMennittEileenHarmon-JonesEddie. 2011. “The Expression of Determination: Similarities between Anger and Approach-Related Positive Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology100:172-81.
24.
Harmon-JonesEddieVaughn-ScottKateMohrSheriSigelmanJonathanHarmon-JonesCindy. 2004. “The Effect of Manipulated Sympathy and Anger on Left and Right Frontal Cortical Activity.” Emotion4:95-101.
25.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyCasseseErin. 2007. “On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger.” In The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, edited by NeumanW. RussellMarcusGeorge E.CriglerAnn N.MacKuenMichael, 202-30. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyTaberCharlesLahavGallya. 2005. “Threat, Anxiety, and Support for Antiterrorism Policies.” American Journal of Political Science49:593-608.
27.
IzardCarroll Ellis. 1972. Patterns of Emotions: A New Analysis of Anxiety and Depression. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28.
KahnKimKenneyPatrick. 1999. “Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation.” American Political Science Review93:877-89.
29.
KeltnerDacherEllsworthPhoebeEdwardsKari. 1993. “Beyond Simple Pessimism: Effects of Sadness and Anger on Social Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64:740-52.
30.
LauRichardPomperGerald. 2004. Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. Campaigning American Style. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.
31.
LavineHoward. 2001. “The Electoral Consequences of Ambivalence toward Presidential Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science45:915-29.
32.
LazarusRichard. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
LernerJenniferKeltnerDacher. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81:146-59.
34.
LernerJenniferTiedensLarissa. 2006. “Portrait of the Angry Decision Maker: How Appraisal Tendencies Shape Anger’s Influence on Cognition.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making19:115-37.
35.
LevensonRichard. 1992. “Autonomic Nervous System Differences Among Emotions.” Psychological Science3:23-27.
36.
LodgeMiltonTaberCharles S.2005. “Automaticity of Affect for Political Candidates, Parties, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis.” Political Psychology26:455-82.
37.
MackieDianeDevosThierrySmithEliot. 2000. “Intergroup Emotions: Explaining Offensive Action Tendencies in an Intergroup Context.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79:602-16.
38.
MacKuenMichaelWolakJenniferKeeleLukeMarcusGeorge. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science54:440-58.
39.
MarcusGeorge. 2003. “The Psychology of Emotion and Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by SearsDavid O.HuddyLeonieJervisRobert, 182-221. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
MarcusGeorgeMacKuenMichael. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review87:672-85.
41.
MarcusGeorgeNeumanW. RussellMacKuenMichael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
MarshAbigailAmbadyNaliniKleckRobert. 2005. “The Effects of Fear and Anger Facial Expressions on Approach- and Avoidance-Related Behaviors.” Emotion5:119-24.
NeumanW. RussellMarcusGeorge E.CriglerAnn N.MacKuenMichael, eds. 2007. The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
RudolphThomasGanglAmyStevensDan. 2000. “The Effects of Efficacy and Emotions on Campaign Involvement.” Journal of Politics62:1189-97.
46.
SearsDavid. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Psychology’s View of Human Nature.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51: 515-530.
SmithCraig A.EllsworthPhoebe. 1985. “Patterns of Cognitive Appraisal in Emotion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48:813-38.
49.
TellegenAukeWatsonDavidClarkLee Anna. 1999. “Further Support for a Hierarchical Model of Affect: Reply to Green and Salovey.” Psychological Science10:307-9.
50.
ValentinoNicholas A.BraderTedGroenendykEric W.GregorowiczKryshaHutchingsVincent L.2011. “Election Night’s Alright For Fighting: The Participatory Impact of Negative Emotions.” Journal of Politics73:156-70.
51.
ValentinoNicholas A.GregorowiczKryshaGroenendykEric. 2009. “Emotions, Efficacy, and the Habit of Participation.” Political Behavior31:307-30.
52.
WatsonDavid. 2009. “Locating Anger in the Hierarchical Structure of Affect: Comment on Carver and Harmon-Jones.” Psychological Bulletin135:205-8.
53.
WatsonDavidClarkLee Ann. 1992. “Affects Separable and Inseparable: On the Hierarchical Arrangement of the Negative Affects.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology62:489-505.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
