This analysis seeks to understand the decline of Supreme Court consensual norms often attributed to the failed leadership of Chief Justice Stone. A new unit of analysis—justice-level dissent and concurrence rates—supports an alternative view of observed increases in dissensual decision making. When these measures are estimated with time-series techniques, results offer evidence of multiple changepoints in this norm of the Court that both lead and lag Stone’s elevation. Broader contextual explanations related to the alteration of the Court’s discretionary issue agenda and its ideological and demographic composition also contribute to fractures in the once-unanimous voting coalitions.
AbrahamHenry J.2008. Justices, Presidents, and Senators: A History of the U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Bush II. 5th ed.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
2.
BlausteinAlbert P.MerskyRoy M.1978. The First One Hundred Justices: Statistical Studies on the Supreme Court of the United States. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.
3.
BoxGeorge E. P.JenkinsGwilym M.1976. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden.
4.
CaldeiraGregory A.ZornChristopher J. W.1998. “Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science42:874-902.
5.
CorleyPamela C.2010. Concurring Opinion Writing on the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: State University of New York Press.
6.
DahlRobert A.1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law6:279-95.
7.
DanelskiDavid J.1986. “Causes and Consequences of Conflict and Its Resolution in the Supreme Court.” In Judicial Conflict and Consensus: Behavioral Studies of American Appellate Courts, edited by GoldmanSheldonLambCharles M.21-49. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
8.
DeBoefSuzannaGranatoJim. 1997. “Near-Integrated Data and the Analysis of Political Relationships.” American Journal of Political Science41:619-40.
9.
EpsteinLeeSegalJeffrey A.SpaethHarold J.WalkerThomas G.2007. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions and Developments. 4th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
10.
Graves v. N.Y. ex rel. O’Keefe. 1939. 306 U.S. 466.
11.
HalpernStephen C.VinesKenneth N.1977. “Institutional Disunity, the Judges’ Bill and the Role of the Supreme Court.” Western Political Quarterly30:471-83.
12.
HaynieStacia L.1992. “Leadership and Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics54:1158-69.
13.
HurwitzMark S.LanierDrew Noble. 2004. “I Respectfully Dissent: Consensus, Agendas, and Policymaking on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1888–1999.” Review of Policy Research21:429-45.
14.
JohnsonTimothy R.SpriggsJames F.IIWahlbeckPaul J.2005. “Passing and Strategic Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Law & Society Review39:349-77.
15.
KobylkaJoseph. 1989. “Leadership on the Supreme Court: Chief Justice Burger and Establishment Clause Litigation.” Western Political Quarterly42:545-69.
16.
LanierDrew Noble. 2003. Of Time and Judicial Behavior: U.S. Supreme Court Agenda-Setting and Decision-Making, 1888–1997. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press.
17.
MaltzmanForrestSpriggsJames F.IIWahlbeckPaul J.2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
MartinAndrew D.QuinnKevin M.ParkJong Hee. 2011. “MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R.” Journal of Statistical Software42: 1-21.
19.
MaveetyNancyTurnerCharles C.WayLori Beth. 2010, “The Rise of the Choral Court: Use of Concurrence in the Burger and Rehnquist Courts.” Political Research Quarterly63:627-39.
20.
McKennaMarian C.2002. Franklin Roosevelt and the Great Constitutional War: The Court-Packing Crisis of 1937. New York: Fordham University Press.
21.
PacelleRichard L.Jr.1991. The Transformation of the Supreme Court’s Agenda: From the New Deal to the Reagan Administration. Boulder, CO: Westview.
22.
PerryH. W.Jr.1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
PritchettC. Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values, 1937–1947. New York: Macmillan.
25.
SegalJeffrey A.CoverAlbert D.1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review83:557-65.
26.
SnyderEloise C.1958. “The Supreme Court as a Small Group.” Social Forces36:232-38.
27.
SpaethHarold J.2009. The Original United States Supreme Court Judicial Database 1953–2008 Terms. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
28.
SpirlingArthur. 2007. “Bayesian Approaches for Limited Dependent Variable Change Point Problems.” Political Analysis15:387-405.
29.
United States v. Carolene Products Co. 1938. 304 U.S. 144.
30.
WalkerThomas G.EpsteinLeeDixonWilliam J.1988. “On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics50: 361-89.
31.
WoodSandra L.1994. “In the Shadow of the Chief: The Role of the Senior Associate Justice on the United States Supreme Court.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota.
32.
WoodSandra L.KeithLinda CampLanierDrew NobleOgundeleAyo. 1998a. “Acclimation Effects for Supreme Court Justices: A Cross Validation, 1888–1940.” American Journal of Political Science42:690-97.
33.
WoodSandra L.KeithLinda CampLanierDrew NobleOgundeleAyo. 1998b. “The Supreme Court 1888–1940: An Empirical Overview.” Social Science History22: 201-24.
