Debate about the sources of intelligence leading to bin Laden’s location has revived the question as to whether interrogational torture is effective. Answering this question is a necessary—if not sufficient—condition for any justification of interrogational torture. Given the impossibility of approaching the question empirically, I address it theoretically, asking whether the use of torture to extract information satisfies reasonable expectations about reliability of information as well as normative constraints on the frequency and intensity of torture. I find that although information from interrogational torture is unreliable, it is likely to be used frequently and harshly.
MatthewAlexander. 2011. Kill or Capture: How a Special Operations Task Force Took Down a Notorious al Qaeda Terrorist. New York: St. Martin’s.
2.
AlexanderMatthewBruningJohn. 2008. How to Break a Terrorist: The U.S. Interrogators Who Used Brains, Not Brutality, to Take Down the Deadliest Man in Iraq. New York: Free Press.
3.
BagaricMirkoClarkeJulie. 2007. Torture: When the Unthinkable Is Morally Permissible. Albany: State University of New York Press.
BradyHenry E.2004. “Introduction: Symposium: Two Paths to a Science of Politics.” Perspectives on Politics2:295-300.
6.
BrecherBob. 2007. Torture and the Ticking Bomb. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
7.
BybeeJay S.2002. “Memorandum for John Rizzo, Acting General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency: Interrogation of al Qaeda Operative.” U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, August1.
8.
CassidySheila. 1977. Audacity to Believe. London: Darton, Longman, and Todd.
CIA. 2004. “Special Review. Counterterrorism, Detention, and Interrogation Activities (September 2001–October 2003).” Central Intelligence Agency, Office of Inspector General, May7.
11.
ClarkeKevin A.PrimoDavid M.2007. “Modernizing Political Science: A Model-Based Approach.” Perspectives on Politics5:741-53.
12.
DenbeauxMarkDenbeauxJoshua. 2006. “Report on Guantanamo Detainees: A Profile of 517 Detainees through Analysis of Department of Defense Data.” Seton Hall University School of Law, February8. GratzDavidGregorekJohnDarbyMatthewEdwardsShanaHartmanShaneMannDanielSkinnerHelen.
13.
DershowitzAlan M.2003. “The Torture Warrant: A Response to Professor Strauss.” New York Law School Law Review48:275-94.
ElshtainJean B.2004. “Reflection on the Problem of ‘Dirty Hands.’” In Torture: A Collection, edited by LevinsonS., 77-89. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
GreenbergKaren J., ed. 2006. The Torture Debate in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
IgnatieffMichael. 2005. “Moral Prohibition at a Price.” In Torture: “Does It Make Us Safer? Is It Ever OK?” A Human Rights Perspective, edited by RothKennethWordenMinky, 18-27. New York: New Press.
KassinSaul M.GudjonssonGisli H.2004. “The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest5:33-67.
LevinsonSanford, ed. 2004. Torture: A Collection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
MackeyChrisMillerGreg. 2004. The Interrogators: Inside the Secret War Against Al Qaeda. New York: Little, Brown.
26.
MayerJane. 2008. The Dark Side. New York: Random House.
27.
McCarthyAndrew C.2006. “Torture: Thinking about the Unthinkable.” In The Torture Debate in America, edited by GreenbergK. J., 98-110. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MialonHugo M.MialonSue H.StinchcombeMaxwell B.2008. “An Economic Analysis of Torture in Counterterrorism.” Unpublished manuscript, December10. http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~hmialon/.
PosnerEric A.VermeuleAdrian. “Should Coercive Interrogation Be Legal?” Michigan Law Review104:671-707.
32.
RejaliDarius. 2007. Torture and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
RumneyPhilip N. S.2006. “The Torture Debate: Is Coercive Interrogation of Terrorist Suspects Effective? A Response to Bagaric and Clarke.” University of San Francisco Law Review40:479-513.
34.
SchellingThomas C.1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
WantchekonLeonardHealyAndrew. 1999. “The ‘Game’ of Torture.” Journal of Conflict Resolution43:596-609.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
