In an effort to examine the causal determinants of performance dynamics for the administrative presidency, the authors apply empirical public management theory to White House administration to explain managerial performance. Utilizing original survey data that measure the perceptions of former officials from the Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and Clinton administrations, we conduct quantitative analyses to determine the extent to which a chief of staff’s background, relationship with the president, and internal as well as external management approaches shape overall perceptions of White House administrative efforts. The authors find that managerial dimensions matter considerably when explaining the dynamics of White House organizational performance.
AndrewsRhysBoyneGeorge A.MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.WalkerRichard. 2005. “Representative Bureaucracy, Organizational Strategy, and Public Service Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15:489-504.
2.
ArnoldPeri E.1998. Making the Managerial Presidency: Comprehensive Reorganization Planning, 1905–1980. 2nd ed.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BarnardChester. 1948. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BozemanBarry. 1993. Public Management: The State of the Art. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BracePaulHinckleyBarbara. 1992. Follow the Leader: Opinion Polls and the Modern Presidents. New York: Basic Books.
6.
BracePaulHinckleyBarbara. 1993. “Presidential Activities from Truman through Reagan: Timing and Impact.” Journal of Politics55:382-98.
7.
BuchananBruce. 1990. “Constrained Diversity: The Organizational Demands of the Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly20:791-822.
8.
ClintonJoshua D.LewisDavid E.2008. “Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences.” Political Analysis16:3-16.
9.
CohenDavid B.1997. “George Bush’s Vicar of the West Wing: John Sununu as White House Chief of Staff.” Congress & the Presidency24:37-59.
10.
CohenDavid B.2002. “From the Fabulous Baker Boys to the Master of Disaster: The White House Chief of Staff in the Reagan and G. H. W. Bush Administrations.” Presidential Studies Quarterly32:463-83.
11.
CohenDavid B.DolanChris J.RosatiJerel A.2002. “A Place at the Table: The Emerging Foreign Policy Roles of the White House Chief of Staff.” Congress & the Presidency29:119-49.
12.
CohenDavid B.HultKarenWalcottCharles. 2006. “The Chief of Staff in the Modern White House: An Empirical Exploration.” Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
13.
CohenDavid B.KrauseGeorge A.2000. “Presidents, Chiefs of Staff, and the Structure of White House Organization: Survey Evidence from the Reagan and Bush Administrations.” Presidential Studies Quarterly30:421-42.
14.
CohenRichard E.BellPeter. 2008. “Congressional Insiders Poll.” National Journal, November22, 12A.
15.
EdwardsGeorge C.III. 1990. Presidential Approval. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
EisenhowerDavid. 1987. “Howard Baker: Fighting the President’s Final Battles.” New York Times Magazine, September6, 18-21, 38, 43-45.
17.
GulickLuther. 1937. Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
18.
HallMimiKeenJudy. 2001. “President’s Chief of Staff Faces Biggest Challenges.” USA Today, February8, 11A.
19.
HargroveEdwin C.GlidewellJohn C., eds. 1990. Impossible Jobs in Public Management. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
HultKaren M.WalcottCharles E.2004. Empowering the White House: Governance under Nixon, Ford, and Carter. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
23.
KernellSamuelPopkinSamuel L., eds. 1986. Chief of Staff: Twenty-Five Years of Managing the Presidency. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
24.
LightPaul. 1984. Vice-Presidential Power: Advice and Influence in the White House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
LynnLaurenceJr.HeinrichCarolyn J.HillCarolyn J.2001. Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
26.
MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.Jr.2001. “Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks: A Model with Evidence from U.S. Public Education.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory11:271-95.
27.
MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.Jr.2002. “Public Management and Organizational Performance: The Effect of Managerial Quality.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management21:629-40.
28.
MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.Jr.2003. “Public Management and Educational Performance: The Impact of Managerial Networking.” Public Administration Review63:675-85.
29.
MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.Jr.2004. “Conceptual Issues in Modeling and Measuring Management and Its Impacts on Performance.” In The Art of Governance: Analyzing Management and Administration, edited by Patricia Ingraham and Laurence E. Lynn, Jr., 195-223. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
30.
MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.Jr.2006. “Modeling Public Management: Empirical Analysis of the Management-Performance Nexus.” Paper presented at the 10th International Research Symposium on Public Management, Glasgow.
31.
MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.Jr.GoerdelHolly T.2006. “Management Activity and Program Performance: Gender as Management Capital.” Public Administration Review66:24-36.
MuellerJohn. 1973. War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley.
34.
Nicholson-CrottySeanO’TooleLaurence J.Jr.2004. “Testing a Model of Public Management and Organizational Performance: The Case of Law Enforcement Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14:1-18.
35.
O’TooleLaurence J.Jr.MeierKenneth J.1999. “Modeling the Impact of Public Management: The Implications of Structural Context.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory9:505-26.
36.
O’TooleLaurence J.Jr.MeierKenneth J.2003. “Plus Ça Change: Public Management, Personnel Stability, and Organizational Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13:43-64.
37.
PfiffnerJames P.1993. “The President’s Chief of Staff: Lessons Learned.” Presidential Studies Quarterly23:77-102.
38.
PfiffnerJames P.1996. The Strategic Presidency: Hitting the Ground Running. 2nd ed.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
39.
RobinsonScott E.2004. “The President as Reformer: When Do Presidents Initiate Administrative Reform through Legislation?” Presidential Studies Quarterly34:793-803.
40.
RoethlisbergerFritz J.DicksonWilliam J.1939. Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
SelznickPhilip. 1957. Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper & Row.
42.
SimonHerbert A.1947. Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
43.
SmithHedrick. 1988. The Power Game: How Washington Really Works. New York: Ballantine Books.
44.
SolomonBurt. 1991. “Key Members of Bush’s Cabinet May Have Knives Out for Sununu.” National Journal, April27, 1006-7.
45.
TaylorFrederick Winslow. 1985. The Principles of Scientific Management. Easton, PA: Hive.
46.
VaughnJustin S.VillalobosJosé D.2009. “The Managing of the Presidency: Applying Theory-Driven Empirical Models to the Study of White House Bureaucratic Performance.” Political Research Quarterly62:158-63.
47.
WalcottCharles E.HultKaren M.1987. “Organizing the White House: Structure, Environment, and Organizational Governance.” American Journal of Political Science31:109-25.
48.
WalcottCharles E.HultKaren M.1995. Governing the White House: From Hoover through LBJ. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
49.
WalcottCharles E.HultKaren M.2005. “White House Structure and Decision Making: Elaborating the Standard Model.” Presidential Studies Quarterly35:303-18.
50.
WalcottCharles E.WarshawShirley AnneWayneStephen J.2001. “The Chief of Staff.” Presidential Studies Quarterly31:464-89.
