The current Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on issues of executive power differs markedly depending on the precise type of executive power in question. Although generally taking an expansive view of presidential power, it often seeks to narrow the authority of executive branch administrative agencies, especially those engaged in regulation. This contrast creates an appearance of inconsistency: At the same time that the court is expanding presidential power, it is pulling back on administrative action and thereby denying the presidency one of its most important sources of authority. But the court’s approach is more coherent if it is understood as aimed at implementation of a conservative legal and political agenda. Moreover, by both expanding presidential powers and limiting administrative authority, the court’s decisions aggrandize judicial power at the expense of the political branches.
AhmedAshrafMenandLevRosenblumNoah A.2024. The making of presidential administration. Harvard Law Review137(8): 2131–2221.
2.
Alabama Association of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Services. 2021. 594 U.S. 758.
3.
Biden v. Nebraska. 2023. 143 S. Ct. 2355.
4.
BrownRebecca L.EpsteinLee. 2023. Is the US Supreme Court a reliable backstop for an overreaching US president? Maybe, but is an overreaching (partisan) court worse?Presidential Studies Quarterly53(2): 234–255.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd. 2024. 601 U.S. 416.
7.
ChafetzJosh. 2June2023. The first name of a Supreme Court justice is not justice. New York Times.
8.
ChertoffEmily R.Bulman-PozenJessica. 2025. The administrative state’s second face. New York University Law Review 100, ahead of print. Available from https://ssrn.com/abstract=5090207.
9.
City of Arlington v. Federal Communications Commission. 2013. 569 U.S. 290.
10.
Collins v. Yellen. 2021. 594 U.S. 220.
11.
Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 2024. 144 S. Ct. 2440.
12.
PaulDansGrovesSteven, eds. 2023. Mandate for leadership: The conservative promise. The Heritage Foundation. Available from static.project2025.org.
13.
DeaconDaniel T.LittmanLeah M.2023. The new major questions doctrine. Virginia Law Review105(9): 1009–1094.
14.
Department of Commerce v. New York. 2019. 588 U.S. 752.
15.
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California. 2020. 591 U.S. 1.
16.
EidelsonBenjamin. 2021. Reasoned explanation and political accountability in the Roberts Court. Yale Law Journal130(7): 1748–1826.
17.
EmersonBlake. 2022. Liberty and democracy through the administrative state: A critique of the Roberts Court’s political theory. Hastings Law Journal73(2): 371–436.
18.
FeinsteinBrian D.2024. Presidential administration and the accountability illusion. Duke Law Journal, ahead of print. Available from https://ssrn.com/abstract=4839362 (accessed 28 July 2024).
19.
Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. 2024. 602 U.S. 367.
20.
Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2010. 561 U.S. 477.
21.
FreemanJodyStephensonMatthew C.2023. The anti-democratic major questions doctrine. Supreme Court Review2022: 1–48.
22.
GlickmanRobert L.LevyRichard E.2022. The new separation of powers formalism and administrative adjudication. George Washington Law Review90(5): 1088–1164.
23.
Gundy v. United States. 2019. 588 U.S. 128.
24.
HickmanKristin. 2022. The Roberts Court’s structural incrementalism. Harvard Law Review136(1): 75–96.
25.
JouvenalJustinSandsLeoMarimowAnn E.20February2025. Trump comes close to the red line of openly defying judges, experts say. Washington Post.
26.
KantorJodiLiptakAdam. 15September2024. How Roberts shaped Trump’s Supreme Court winning streak. New York Times.
27.
Kisor v. Wilkie. 2019. 588 U.S. 558.
28.
KoenigThomas A.PontzBenjamin R.2023. Note: The Roberts Court’s functionalist turn in administrative law. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy46(1): 221–255.
29.
LiptakAdamVanSickleAbbieParlapianoAlicia. 2July2024. The major Supreme Court decisions in 2024. New York Times.
30.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. 2024. 144 S. Ct. 2244.
31.
Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2018. 585 U.S. 237.
32.
ManningJohn F.2011. Separation of powers as ordinary interpretation. Harvard Law Review124(8): 1939–2040.
33.
MarimowAnn E.MourtoupalasNickRajiTobi. 1July2024. The major Supreme Court rulings of 2024. Washington Post.
34.
McGinnisJohn O.YangXiaorui. 2023. The counter-reformation of American administrative law. Wake Forest Law Review58(2): 387–463.
35.
MerrillThomas W.2023. The major questions doctrine: Right diagnosis, wrong remedy. Hoover Institution. Available from www.hoover.org.
36.
MetzgerGillian E.2017. 1930s redux: The administrative state under siege. Harvard Law Review131(1): 1–95.
37.
MetzgerGillian E.2020. The Roberts court and administrative law. The Supreme Court Review2019: 1–71.
38.
MortensonJulian DavisBagleyNicholas. 2021. Delegation at the founding. Columbia Law Review121(2): 277–368.
39.
National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2022. 595 U.S. 109.
40.
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. 2012. 567 U.S. 519.
41.
National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning. 2014. 573 U.S. 513.
42.
NzelibeJide. 2006. The fable of the nationalist president and the parochial Congress. UCLA Law Review53(5): 1217–1273.
43.
Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency. 2024. 144 S. Ct. 2040.
44.
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC. 2018. 584 U.S. 325.
45.
RodríguezCristina M.2024. Coercion, discretion, and the Roberts court. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science713:107–121.
46.
RosenblumNoah. 28June2024. The supreme court won’t stop dismantling the government’s power. The Atlantic. Available from www.theatlantic.com.
47.
SavageCharlie. 4July2024. Legal conservatives’ long game: Amp up presidential power but kneecap federal agencies. New York Times.
48.
SavageCharlie. 5February2025a. Trump brazenly defies laws in escalating executive power grab. New York Times.
49.
SavageCharlie. 13February2025b. Courts start to impede momentum of Trump’s effort to dismantle government. New York Times.
50.
SchwartzMattathias. 26August2024. How a federal court in New Orleans is driving the conservative agenda. New York Times.
51.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy. 2024. 144 S. Ct. 2117.
52.
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 2020. 591 U.S. 197.
53.
ShearMichael D.ThrushGlennSavageCharlieRappeportAlan. 7August2021. As Democrats seethed, White House struggled to contain eviction fallout. New York Times.
54.
ShortJodi L.ShugermanJed H.2024. Major questions about presidentialism: Untangling the “chain of dependence” across administrative law. Boston College Law Review65(2): 511–599.
55.
SkowronekStephen, 2009. The conservative insurgency and presidential power: A developmental perspective on the unitary executive. Harvard Law Review122(8): 2070–2103.
56.
SkowronekStephenDearbornJohn A.KingDesmond. 2021. Phantoms of a beleaguered republic: The deep state and the unitary executive. Oxford University Press.
57.
SmithRogers M.2024. Is Chief Justice Roberts an institutionalist? A historical institutionalist analysis. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science713:68–87.
58.
SohoniMila. 2022. The major questions quartet. Harvard Law Review136(1): 262–318.
59.
Stern v. Marshall. 2011. 564 U.S. 462.
60.
SumwallAlan C.BaumannBeau J.2023. Clarifying judicial aggrandizement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online172: 24–42.
