The vetting of potential federal judges by the Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary of the American Bar Association (ABA) is politically controversial. Conservatives allege the Standing Committee is biased against Republican nominees. The ABA and its defenders argue the ABA rates nominees objectively based on their qualifications. The authors investigate whether accusations of liberal bias have merit. They analyze all individuals nominated to the U.S. Courts of Appeals from 1977 to 2008. Using genetic matching methods and ordered logit models, the authors find evidence of bias against Republican nominees in the ABA’s ratings. They conclude by discussing the implications of these results.
BenacNancy. 2005. “Group Becoming Must for Some Conservatives.” Associated Press, July18.
3.
BoydChristina L.EpsteinLeeMartinAndrew D.2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science54:389-411.
4.
CochranWilliam G.RubinDonald B.1973. “Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review.” SankhyaA35:417-46.
5.
CurridenMark. 2001. “ABA Loses Screening Role for Judgeships under Bush.” Dallas Morning News, March23, A4.
6.
DiamondAlexisSekhonJasjeet S.2008. “Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies.” Working paper.
7.
GilesMicheal W.HettingerVirginia A.PeppersTodd. 2001. “Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas.” Political Research Quarterly54:623-41.
8.
GoldmanSheldon. 1997. Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
GrossmanJoel B.1965. Lawyers and Judges: The ABA and the Politics of Judicial Selection. New York: John Wiley.
10.
HaireSusan B.2001. “Rating the Ratings of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary.” Justice System Journal22:1-17.
11.
HoDaniel E.ImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth A.2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis15:199-236.
LewisNeil A.2009. “Moderate Is Said to Be Pick for Court.” New York Times, March17, A14.
15.
LindgrenJames T.2001. “Examining the American Bar Association’s Ratings of Nominees to the U.S. Courts of Appeals for Political Bias, 1989–2000.” Journal of Law and Politics17:1-40.
16.
LongJ. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
LottJohn R.Jr.2001. “The American Bar Association, Judicial Ratings, and Political Bias.” Journal of Law and Politics17:41-62.
18.
LottJohn R.Jr.2006. “Pulling Rank.” New York Times, January25 (final ed.), A21.
19.
MartinekWendy L.2005. “Lower Federal Court Confirmation Database.” Constitution Project. http://cdp.binghamton.edu/lfccd.htm, accessed on August 30, 2011.
20.
MartinekWendy L.KemperMarkVan WinkleSteven R.2002. “To Advise and Consent: The Senate and Lower Federal Court Nominations, 1977–1998.” Journal of Politics64:337-61.
21.
MurrayFrank J.2001. “ABA’s Role on Judges Ruled Out; Liberals Assail, Conservatives Hail.” Washington Times, March23, A1.
22.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B.1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika70:41-55.
24.
RossWilliam G.1990. “Participation by the Public in the Federal Judicial Selection Process.” Vanderbilt Law Review43:1-84.
25.
RutkusDenis Steven. 1995. “The American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary: A Historical Overview” (CRS Report 96-446). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
26.
RutkusDenis Steven. 2008. “The Role of Home State Senators in the Selection of Lower Federal Court Judges” (CRS Report RL34405). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
27.
SaksMichael J.VidmarNeil. 2001. “A Flawed Search for Bias in the American Bar Association’s Ratings of Prospective Judicial Nominees: A Critique of the Lindgren Study.” Journal of Law and Politics17:219-54.
28.
SchererNancy. 2005. Scoring Points: Politicians, Activists, and the Lower Federal Court Appointment Process. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
SchererNancyBartelsBrandon L.SteigerwaltAmy. 2008. “Sounding the Fire Alarm: The Role of Interest Groups in the Lower Court Confirmation Process.” Journal of Politics70:1026-39.
30.
SchererNancyMillerBanks. 2009. “The Federalist Society’s Influence on the Federal Judiciary.” Political Research Quarterly62:366-78.
31.
SlotnickElliot. 1983a. “The ABA Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary: A Contemporary Assessment—Part 1.” Judicature66:348-62.
32.
SlotnickElliot. 1983b. “The ABA Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary: A Contemporary Assessment—Part 2.” Judicature66:385-93.
33.
ToberStephen L.2006. “Statement on Behalf of the Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary of the American Bar Association Concerning the Nomination of Michael Brett Kavanaugh to Be Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit before the Committee on the Judiciary.” U.S. Senate, May8.
34.
TomzMichaelWittenbergJasonKingGary. 2003. “Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/
35.
TorrySaundra. 1996. “In Speech, Dole Reignites Feud over Bar Association.” Washington Post, April20, A10.
36.
WermielStephen. 1987. “Anti-Bork Members on ABA Panel Had Several Concerns.” Wall Street Journal, September22, A25.
37.
WilsonSarah. 2003. “Appellate Judicial Appointments during the Clinton Presidency: An Inside Perspective.” Journal of Appellate Practice and Process5:29-47.
