Despite pervasive downward pressure on government policy from exogenous forces, the author argues that partisanship still exerts an effect on privatization in Latin America. When a country is indebted to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and a government of the right is in power, scholars can expect increased levels of privatization. However, when a country is indebted to the IMF and a government of the left is in power, electoral incentives will prompt these governments to ignore IMF pressure and reduce levels of privatization. The author tests this argument on a data set of eighteen Latin American countries, between the years 1984 and 1998.
AchenChristopher. 2000. “Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of the Independent Variables.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles.
2.
AllanJamesScruggsLyle. 2004. “Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science48:496-512.
3.
AndrewsDavid M.1994. “Capital Mobility and State Autonomy: Towards a Structural Theory of International Monetary Relations.” International Studies Quarterly38:193-218.
4.
AzpiazuDanielBasualdoEduardo. 2004. “Las Privatizaciones en la Argentina. Genesis, Desarrollo y Principales Impactos Estructurales.” In Las Privatizaciones y la desnacionalización de América Latina, edited by PetrasJamesVeltmeyerHenry. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Prometeo.
5.
BeckNathaniel. 2001. “Time-Series-Cross-Section Data: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years?” American Review of Political Science4:271-93.
6.
BeckThorstenClarkeGeorgeGroffAlbertoKeeferPhilipWalshPatrick. 2001. “New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions.” World Bank Economic Review15:165-76.
7.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan N.1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review89:634-47.
8.
BierstekerThomas J.1990. “Reducing the Role of the State in the Economy: A Conceptual Exploration of IMF and World Bank Prescriptions.” International Studies Quarterly34:477-92.
9.
BiglaiserGlenBrownDavid. 2003. “The Determinants of Privatization in Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly56:77-89.
10.
BiglaiserGlenBrownDavid. 2005. “The Determinants of Economic Liberalization in Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly58:671-80.
11.
BiglaiserGlenDanisMichelle A.2002. “Privatization and Democracy: The Effects of Regime Type in the Developing World.” Comparative Political Studies35:83-102.
12.
BoixCarles. 1997. “Privatizing The Public Business Sector in the Eighties: Economic Performance, Partisan Responses and Divided Governments.” British Journal of Political Science27:473-96.
13.
BortolottiBernardoFantiniMarcellaSiniscalcoDomenico. 2003. “Privatization Around the World: Evidence from Panel Data.” Journal of Public Economics88:305-22.
14.
BreenMichael. 2010. “Domestic Interests, International Bargaining and IMF Lending.” Working Paper in International Studies Series (2010-07), Center for International Studies, Dublin City University, Dublin.
15.
BruneNancy. 2004. “Privatization Around the World.” PhD diss., Yale University.
16.
BruneNancyGarrett.Geoffrey2000. “The Diffusion of Privatization in the Developing World.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
17.
BruneNancyGarrettGeoffreyKogutBruce. 2004. “The International Monetary Fund and the Global Spread of Privatization.” IMF Staff Papers51:195-219.
18.
BruneNancyGuisingerAlexandra. 2003. “The Diffusion of Capital Account Liberalization in the Developing World.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
19.
CameronDavid. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy.” American Political Science Review72:1243-61.
20.
ChavezDaniel. 2007. “Hacer o no hacer: los gobiernos progresistas de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay frente a las privatizaciones.” Nueva Sociedad Enero/Febrero207: 63-79.
21.
ChinMenzie DavidItoHiro. 2008. “A New Measure of Financial Openness.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis10:309-22.
22.
CopelovitchMark S.2010. “Master or Servant? Common Agency and the Political Economy of IMF Lending.” International Studies Quarterly54:49-77.
23.
CoppedgeMichael. 1997. “A Classification of Latin American Political Parties.” Working Paper No. 244, Kellogg Institute, Notre Dame, IN.
24.
DoyleDavid. 2010. “Politics and Privatization: Exogenous Pressures, Domestic Incentives and State Divestiture in Latin America.” Journal of Public Policy30:291-320.
25.
DreznerDaniel. 2001. “Globalization and Policy Convergence.” International Studies Review3:379-410.
26.
The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2003. Argentina. Country Report, December: 1-26.
27.
GarrettGeoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GillStephen R.LawDavid. 1989. “Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital.” International Studies Quarterly33:475-99.
29.
GwartneyJamesLawsonRobertNortonSeth. 2008. “Economic Freedom of the World: 2008 Annual Report.” Fraser Institute, Calgary, Canada.
30.
HaggardStephenKaufmanRobert. 1995. “The Challenges of Consolidation.” In Economic Reform and Democracy, edited by DiamondLarryPlattnerMarc, 1-12, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
HaggardStephenMaxfieldSylvia. 1996. “The Political Economy of Financial Internationalization in the Developing World.” In Internationalization and Domestic Politics, edited by MilnerHelenKeohaneRobert, 209-42. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
HartAustin. 2010. “Death of the Partisan? Globalization and Taxation in South America, 1990–2006.” Comparative Political Studies20:304-28.
33.
HeniszW. J.ZelnerB. A.GuillénM. F.2005. “The Worldwide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977–1999.” American Sociological Review70:871-97.
34.
HibbsDouglas. 1977. “Political parties and Macroeconomic Policies.” American Political Science Review71:1467-87.
35.
HicksAlexanderSwankDuane. 1992. “Political Institutions and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies.” American Political Science Review86:658-74.
36.
HonakerJamesKingGaryBlackwellMatthew. 2007. “Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data.” http://gking.harvard.edu/amelia/ (accessed October 15, 2010).
37.
HuberEvelyneStephensJohn D.MustilloThomasPribbleJennifer. 2008. “Latin America and the Caribbean Political Dataset, 1945–2001.” University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
38.
Independent Evaluation Office of the International Monetary Fund. 2001. “Structural Conditionality in IMF-Supported Programs.” International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
39.
International Monetary Fund. 2003. “Argentina: Letter of Intent and Memorandum of Economic and Financial Policies and Technical Memorandum of Understanding.” International Monetary Fund, Buenos Aires, September10.
40.
KaufmanRobert R.Segura-UbiergoAlex. 2001. “Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America: A Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis, 1973–97.” World Politics53:553-87.
41.
KingstonePeterYoungJoseph. 2009. “Partisanship and Policy Choice: What’s Left for the Left in Latin America?”Political Research Quarterly62:29-41.
42.
KitscheltHerbert. 2000. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies33:845-79.
43.
KurtzMarcus J.BrooksSarah M.2008. “Embedding Neoliberal Reform in Latin America.” World Politics60:231-80.
LodolaGermanQueiroloRosario. 2005. Ideological Classification of Latin American Political Parties. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
46.
MainwaringScottShugartMatthew Soberg. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
MorgensternScottNacifBenito, eds. 2002. Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
MurilloVictoria. 2002. “Partisan Bias in Policy Convergence: Privatization Choices in Latin America.” World Politics54:462-93.
49.
MorleySamuelMachadoRobertoPettinatoStefano. 1999. “Indexes of Structural Reforms in Latin America.” CEPAL Economic Development Division, Serie Reformas Económicas, 12.
50.
MurilloMaría Victoria. 2009. Political Competition, Partisanship and Policy Making in Latin American Public Utilities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
MurilloMaría VictoriaMartínez-GallardoCecilia. 2007. “Political Competition and Policy Adoption: Market Reforms in Latin American Public Utilities.” American Journal of Political Science51:120-39.
52.
MurilloVictoriaSchrankA.2005. “With a Little Help from my Friends.” Comparative Political Studies38:971-99.
53.
OatleyThomas. 1999. “How Constraining Is Capital Mobility? The Partisan Hypothesis in an Open Economy.” American Journal of Political Science43:1003-27.
54.
Pérez-LiñánAníbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
PolilloSimoneGuillénM. F.2005. “Globalization Pressures and the State: The Global Spread of Central Bank Independence.” American Journal of Sociology110:1764-802.
56.
Pop-ElechesGrigore. 2009. From Economic Crisis to Reform: IMF programs in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
PrzeworskiAdamWallersteinMichael. 1988. “Structural Dependence of the State on Capital.” American Political Science Review82:11-30.
58.
RudraNita. 2002. “Globalization and the Decline of the Welfare State in Less-Developed Countries.” International Organization56:411-45.
59.
SchneiderVolkerFinkSimonTenbückenMarc. 2005. “Buying Out the State: A Comparative Perspective on the Privatization of Infrastructures.” Comparative Political Studies38:704-27.
60.
ShugartMatthew SobergCareyJohn. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SilvaEduardo. 2009. Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SmithAlastairVreelandJames Raymond. 2006. “The Survival of Political Leaders and IMF Programs.” In Globalization and the Nation State: The Impact of the IMF and the World Bank, edited by RanisGustavVreelandJames RaymondKosackStephen, 263-89. New York: Routledge.
63.
StallingsBarbara. 1992. “International Influence on Economic Policy.” In The Politics of Economic Adjustment, edited by HaggardStephenKaufmanRobert, 41-88. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
StokesSusan. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65.
TsebelisGeorge. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
ValenzuelaArturo. 2004. “Latin American Presidencies Interrupted.” Journal of Democracy15:5-19.
67.
VreelandJames. 1999. “The IMF: Lender of Last Resort or Scapegoat.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
68.
VreelandJames. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
WiesehomeierNinaBenoitKenneth2009. “Presidents, Parties and Policy Competition.” Journal of Politics, 71:1435-1447.
70.
WeylandKurt. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
WibbelsErikArceMoisés. 2003. “Globalization, Taxation, and Burden-Shifting in Latin America.” International Organization57:111-36.
72.
World Bank. 2010. “World Development Indicators. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.” World Bank, Washington DC.
73.
ZohlnhöferReimutObingerHerbertWolfFrieder. 2008. “Partisan Politics, Globalization, and the Determinants of Privatization Proceeds in Advanced Democracies (1990–2000).” Governance21:95-121.
