This article introduces a new method, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), to the study of state policy choice and the role of ideas in politics. The authors hypothesize an important role for normative beliefs in state policy choice even for policies that go beyond traditional subjects of “morality” policy. Specifically, the authors find that “precautionary norms” are influential determinants of recent state environmental policies regulating chemicals, even in the face of significant economic impacts. They conclude that these results offer new theoretical ideas relevant to the state innovation and diffusion literature as well as the study of ideas in the policy process.
AllenMahalley D.PettusCarrieHaider-MarkelDonald P.2004. “Making the National Local: Specifying the Conditions for National Government Influence on State Policymaking.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly4:318-44.
2.
BaumgartnerFrank R.JonesBryan D.1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BehanPamela. 2007. Solving the Health Care Problem: How Other Nations Succeeded and Why the United States Has Not. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4.
BélandDaniel. 2005. “Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective.” Social Policy & Administration39:1-18.
5.
BélandDanielCoxRobert Henry, eds. 2011. Ideas and Politics in Social Research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
BermanSheri. 1998. The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BerryFrancesBerryWilliam D.2007. “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research.” In Theories of the Policy Process. 2nd ed., edited by SabatierPaul A., 223-260. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
8.
BerryWilliam D.BaybeckBrady. 2005. “Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition.” American Political Science Review99:505-20.
9.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-1993.” American Journal of Political Science42:327-48.
10.
BlythMark. 2001. “The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, Distributional Conflict, and Institutional Change.” World Politics54:1-26.
11.
BlythMark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BockingStephen. 2005. “Protecting the Rain Barrel: Discourses and the Roles of Science in a Suburban Environmental Controversy.” Environmental Politics14:611-28.
13.
BoehmkeFrederick J.WitmerRichard. 2004. “Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion.” Political Research Quarterly57:39-51.
14.
CanonBradley C.LawrenceBaum. 1981. “Patterns of Adoption of Tort Law Innovations: An Application of Diffusion Theory to Judicial Doctrines.” American Political Science Review75:975-87.
15.
ChongDennisDruckmanJames N.2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science10:103-26.
CrawfordNeta C.2009. “Homo Politicus and Argument (Nearly) All the Way Down: Persuasion in Politics”. Perspectives on Politics7:103-24.
18.
DaleyDorothy M.GarandJames C.2005. “Horizontal Diffusion, Vertical Diffusion, and Internal Pressure in State Environmental Policy Making, 1989-1998.” American Politics Research33:615-44.
19.
de WitCynthia. 2002. “An Overview of Brominated Flame Retardants in the Environment.” Chemosphere46:583-624.
20.
EckleyNoelleSelinHenrik. 2004. “All Talk, Little Action: Precaution and European Chemicals Regulation.” Journal of European Public Policy11:78-105.
21.
FinlaysonAlan. 2004. “Political Science, Political Ideas and Rhetoric.” Economy and Society33:528-49.
GearhartJeffPosseltHans. 2006. Toxic at Any Speed. Ann Arbor, MI: Ecology Center.
24.
GormleyWilliam T.Jr.1983. The Politics of Public Utility Regulation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
25.
GrendstadGunnar. 2007. “Causal Complexity and Party Preference.” European Journal of Political Research46: 121-49.
26.
GrossbackLawrence J.Nicholson-CrottySeanPetersonDavid A. M.2004. “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion.” American Politics Research32:521-45.
27.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.MeierKenneth J.1996. “The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.” Journal of Politics58:332-50.
28.
HajerMaartenVersteegWytske. 2005. “A Decade of Discourse Analysis of Environmental Politics: Achievements, Challenges, Perspectives.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning7:175-84.
29.
HayColin. 2011. “Ideas and the Construction of Interests.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Research, edited by BélandDanielCoxRobert Henry, 65-82. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
HaysScott P.1996. “Influences on Reinvention during the Diffusion of Innovations.” Political Research Quarterly49: 631-50.
31.
HaysScott P.EslerMichaelHaysCarol E.1996. “Environmental Commitment among the States: Integrating Alternative Approaches to State Environmental Policy.” Publius26(2): 41-58.
32.
KarchAndrew. 2006. “National Intervention and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” American Politics Research34: 403-26.
33.
KarchAndrew. 2007. Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion among the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
34.
KingdonJohn. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.
35.
LowiTheodore J.1979. The End of Liberalism. New York: W.W Norton & Company.
36.
LowryWilliam R.1992. The Dimensions of Federalism: State Governments and Pollution Control Policies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
37.
MehtaJal. 2011. “The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics: From ‘Whether’ to ‘How.’” In Ideas and Politics in Social Research, edited by BélandDanielCoxRobert Henry, 23-46. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
MillerEdward Alan. 2004. “Advancing Comparative State Policy Research: Toward Conceptual Integration and Methodological Expansion.” State and Local Government Review36:35-58.
39.
MintromMichaelVergariSandra. 1998. “Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms.” Journal of Politics60:126-48.
40.
MooneyChristopher Z.2000. “The Decline of Federalism and the Rise of Morality-Policy Conflict in the United States.” Publius30:171-88.
41.
MooneyChristopher Z.2001a. “Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion.” Political Research Quarterly54: 103-24.
42.
MooneyChristopher Z.2001b. The Public Clash of Private Values. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
MyersNancy J.RaffenspergerCarolyn. 2006. Precautionary Tools for Reshaping Environmental Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
Nicholson-CrottySeanMeierKenneth J.2002. “Size Doesn’t Matter: In Defense of Single-State Studies.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly2:411-22.
46.
ParsonsCraig. 2007. How to Make Arguments in Political Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
ParsonsCraig. 2011. “Ideas, Position and Supranationality.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Research, edited by BélandDanielCoxRobert Henry, 65-82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
PotoskiMatthew. 2001. “Clean Air Federalism: Do States Race to the Bottom?”Public Administration Review61:335-42.
49.
PralleSarah. 2006. “The Mouse that Roared: Agenda Setting in Canadian Pesticides Politics.” Policy Studies Journal34:171-94.
50.
RabeBarry G.2004. Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Evolving Politics of American Climate Change Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
51.
RaginCharles C.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
RaginCharles C.2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
RaginCharles C.ShulmanDavidWeinbergAdamGranBrian. 2003. “Beyond Analytic Induction: Complexity, Generality and Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Field Methods15:323-40.
54.
RaymondLeighOliveAndrea. 2009. “Ideas, Discourse, and Rhetoric in Political Choice.” Polity41:189-210.
55.
RihouxBenoit. 2006. “Governmental Participation and the Organizational Adaptation of Green Parties: On Access, Slack, Overload, and Distress.” European Journal of Political Research45:S69-98.
56.
RihouxBenoitRaginCharles C.2008. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
RingquistEvan J.1994. “Policy Influence and Policy Responsiveness in State Pollution Control.” Policy Studies Journal22:25-43.
58.
SapatAlka. 2004. “Devolution and Innovation: The Adoption of State Environmental Policy Innovation by Administrative Agencies.” Public Administration Review64:141-51.
59.
SchneiderAnneIngramHelen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review87:334-49.
60.
ShipanCharles R.VoldenCraig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science52:840-57.
61.
SkrentnyJohn David. 1996. The Ironies of Affirmative Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
SquirePeverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17:69-79.
63.
SteinmoSven. 2003. “The Evolution of Policy Ideas: Tax Policy in the 20th Century.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations5:206-36.
64.
StoneDeborah. 2002. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. Rev. ed.New York: Norton.
65.
SunsteinCass R.2005. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
VogelDavid. 1995. “Trading Up and Governing Across: Transnational Governance and Environmental Protection.” Journal of European Public Policy4:556-71.
67.
VogelDavid. 2003. “The Hare and the Tortoise Revisited: The New Politics of Consumer and Environmental Regulation in Europe.” British Journal of Political Science33:557-80.
68.
WalkerJack L.1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review63:880-99.
69.
WeldonS. Laurel2004. “The Dimensions and Policy Impact of Feminist Civil Society: Democratic Policymaking on Violence against Women in the Fifty U.S. States.” International Feminist Journal of Politics6:1-28.
70.
WhitesideKerry H.2006. Precautionary Politics: Principle and Practice in Confronting Environmental Risk. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71.
WoodsNeal D.2006. “Interstate Competition and Environmental Regulation: A Test of the Race-to-the-Bottom Thesis.” Social Science Quarterly87:174-89.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
