This article uses the post-Katrina migration as an exogenous shock to test theories of racial threat while minimizing concerns about selection bias. Drawing in part on a new survey of 3,879 respondents, it demonstrates that despite the national concern about issues of race and poverty following Katrina, people in communities that took in evacuees became less supportive of spending to help the poor and African Americans. The results suggest a novel hypothesis that threatened responses to newcomers hinge on both local conditions and the frames that develop around their arrival.
AldrichDaniel P.CrookKevin. 2008. “Strong Civil Society as a Double-Edged Sword.” Political Research Quarterly61:379-90.
2.
AllportGordon W.1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
3.
Ben-PorathEranShakerLee K.2007. “Ethnicity and Episodic Framing in the Wake of Hurricane Katrina.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April.
4.
BerinskyAdam J.KinderDonald R.2006. “Making Sense of Issues through Media Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis.” Journal of Politics68:640-56.
5.
BlalockHubert M.1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: John Wiley.
6.
BooksJohnPrysbyCharles. 1999. “Contextual Effects on Retrospective Economic Evaluations: The Impact of the State and Local Economy.” Political Behavior21:1-16.
7.
ChongDennisDruckmanJames N.2007a. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review101:637-55.
8.
ChongDennisDruckmanJames N.2007b. “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation.” Journal of Communication57:99-118.
9.
DiamondAlexisSekhonJasjeet. 2008. “Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies.” http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/.
10.
DunningThad. 2008. “Improving Causal Inference: Strengths and Limitations of Natural Experiments.” Political Research Quarterly61:282-93.
11.
EnosRyan D.2011. “What Tearing Down Public Housing Projects Teaches Us about the Effect of Racial Threat on Political Participation.” Harvard University. http://ryandenos.com/papers/chicago_threat.pdf
12.
FongChristina M.LuttmerErzo F.P.2009. “What Determines Giving to Hurricane Katrina Victims? Experimental Evidence on Racial Group Loyalty.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics1(2):64-87.
13.
FrymerPaulStrolovitchDara Z.WarrenDorian T.2006. “New Orleans Is Not the Exception: Re-politicizing the Study of Racial Inequality.” Du Bois Review3:37-57.
14.
GamsonWilliam A.1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GayClaudine. 2006. “Seeing Difference: The Effect of Economic Disparity on Black Attitudes toward Latinos.” American Journal of Political Science50:982-97.
16.
GilensMartin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Anti-poverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
GilesMichael W.HertzKaenan. 1994. “Racial Threat and Partisan Identification.” American Political Science Review88:317-26.
18.
GlaserJames M.1994. “Back to the Black Belt: Racial Environment and White Racial Attitudes in the South.” Journal of Politics56:21-41.
19.
GreenDonald P.StrolovitchDara Z.WongJanelle S.1998. “Defended Neighborhoods, Integration, and Racially Motivated Crime.” American Journal of Sociology104: 372-403.
20.
GrossKimberlyKohenakMarcie. 2007. “Race, Poverty, and Causal Attributions: Media Framing of the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April.
21.
GruskyDavid B.RyoEmily. 2006. “Did Katrina Recalibrate Attitudes Toward Poverty and Inequality?” Du Bois Review3:59-82.
22.
Harris-LacewellMelissaImaiKosukeYamamotoTeppei. 2007. “Racial Gaps in the Response to Hurricane Katrina: An Experimental Study.” http://imai.princeton.edu.
23.
HoDaniel E.KingGaryImaiKosukeStuartElizabeth. 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Improving Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis10:1-38.
24.
HopkinsDaniel J.2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review104:40-60.
25.
HopkinsDaniel J.Forthcoming. “National Debates, Local Responses: The Origins of Local Concern about Immigration in the U.S. and the U.K.” British Journal of Political Science.
26.
HuckfeldtRobertSpragueJohn. 1995. Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanley. 2006. “Worlds Apart: Blacks and Whites React to Hurricane Katrina.” Du Bois Review3:97-113.
28.
IyengarShantoKinderDonald R.1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica47:263-92.
31.
KeyV. O.1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.
32.
KildayAnne MarieVillafrancaArmando. 2006. “Residents Urge White to Send Evacuees Home: Neighborhood Holds Meeting to Discuss Growing Crime Problem.” Houston Chronicle, August31, B1.
33.
KinderDonald R.1998. “Communication and Opinion.” Annual Review of Political Science1:167-97.
34.
KinderDonald R.KiewietD. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science11:129-61.
35.
KingGaryHonakerJamesJosephAnneScheveKenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review95:49-69.
36.
KruseKevin M.2005. White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Conservatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
MendelbergTali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
MutzDiana C.1994. “Contextualizing Personal Experience: The Role of Mass Media.” Journal of Politics56: 689-714.
39.
MutzDiana C.1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
MutzDiana C.MondakJeffrey J.1997. “Dimensions of Sociotropic Behavior: Group-Based Judgments of Fairness and Well-Being.” American Journal of Political Science41: 284-308.
41.
OliverJ. EricWongJanelle. 2003. “Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings.” American Journal of Political Science47:567-82.
42.
PettigrewThomas F.1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology49:65-85.
PutnamRobert D.2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the 21st Century: The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies30: 137-74.
SteinRobert M.StephanieShirley PostRindenAllison. 2000. “Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes.” Political Research Quarterly53: 285-303.
48.
TaylorMarylee C.1998. “How White Attitudes Vary with the Racial Composition of Local Populations: Numbers Count.” American Sociological Review63:512-35.
49.
TroppLinda R.PettigrewThomas E.2005. “Relationships Between Intergroup Contact and Prejudice among Minority and Majority Status Groups.” Psychological Science16:951-57.
50.
VaranoSean P.SchaferJoseph A.CancinoJeffrey M.DeckerScott H.GreeneJack R.2010. “A Tale of Three Cities: Crime and Displacement after Hurricane Katrina.” Journal of Criminal Justice38:42-50.
51.
WelchSusanSigelmanLeeBledsoeTimothyCombsMichael. 2001. Race and Place: Race Relations in an American City. New York: Cambridge University Press.
WilsonWilliam J.TaubRichard P.2006. There Goes the Neighborhood: Racial, Ethnic, and Class Tensions in Four Chicago Neighborhoods and Their Meaning for America. New York: Vintage.
54.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
