This article describes a field experiment designed to test the efficacy of get-out-the-vote (GOTV) techniques in a new context and for an understudied population. It evaluates the effectiveness of nonpartisan GOTV messages delivered via personal contact and mail in a heavily Latino community during the 2004 presidential campaign. It proposes and tests an alternative model of voter turnout based on Zaller’s receive–accept–sample model of public opinion. The findings are consistent with the authors’ predictions; mobilization efforts increase turnout, but mobilization effects vary across citizens based on their propensity to vote. There is a large increase among episodic voters but little increase among habitual or registered nonvoters.
AldrichJohn. 1993. Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science37:246-78.
2.
ArceneauxKevinNickersonDavid W.2009. Who is mobilized to vote? A re-analysis of 11 field experiments. American Journal of Political Science53:1-16.
3.
ArvizuJohn R.GarciaF. Chris. 1996. Latino voting participation: Explaining and differentiating Latino voting turnout. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences18: 104-28.
4.
BartelsLarry. 2008. Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
BendorJonathanDiermeierDanielTingMichael. 2003. A behavioral model of turnout. American Political Science Review97:261-80.
6.
BerryWilliam D.DeMerittJacqueline H. R.EsareyJustin. 2010. Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential?American Journal of Political Science54:248-66.
7.
BlaisAndre. 2000. To vote or not to vote: The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
8.
BramborThomasClarkWilliamGolderMatt. 2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis14:63-82.
9.
DeSipioLouis. 1996. Counting on the Latino vote. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
10.
DownsAnthony. 1957. Economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
11.
FowlerJames H.2006. Habitual voting and behavioral turnout. Journal of Politics68:335-44.
12.
FreedmanDavid A.SekhonJasjeet S.2008. Endogeneity in probit response models. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
13.
Garcia BedollaLisaMichelsonMelissa R.2009. What do voters need to know? Testing the role of cognitive information in Asian American voter mobilization. American Politics Research37:254-74.
14.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.2000a. The effect of a nonpartisan get-out-the-vote drive: An experimental study of leafleting. Journal of Politics62:846-57.
15.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.2000b. The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review94: 653-63.
16.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.2001. Do phone calls increase voter turnout? A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly65:75-85.
17.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.2003. Analyzing experimental data with binary outcomes: A cautionary note. Unpublished manuscript.
18.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.2005. Correction to Gerber and Green (2000), replications of disputed findings, and reply to Imai (2005). American Political Science Review99: 301-13.
19.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.LarimerChristopher W.2008. Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review102:33-48.
20.
GreenDonald P.2004. Mobilizing African-American voters using direct mail and commercial phone banks: A field experiment. Political Research Quarterly57:245-55.
21.
GreenDonald P.AronowPeter M.McGrathMary C.September 2010. Making sense of 200+ field experiments on voter mobilization, part I. Paper presented at American Political Science Association meetings, Washington, DC.
22.
GreenDonald P.GerberAlan S.2008. Get out the vote! How to increase voter turnout. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
23.
GreenDonald P.GerberAlan S.2010. Introduction to social pressure and voting: New experimental evidence. Political Behavior32:331-36.
24.
GreenDonald P.GerberAlan S.NickersonDavid W.2003a. The challenge of bringing voter mobilization to scale: An evaluation of youth vote’s 2002 phone banking campaigns. Unpublished manuscript, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University.
25.
GreenDonald P.GerberAlan S.NickersonDavid W.2003b. Getting out the vote in local elections: Results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. Journal of Politics65:1083-96.
26.
GreenDonald P.ShapiroIan1994. Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
ImaiKosuke2005. Do get-out-the–vote calls reduce turnout? The importance of statistical methods for field experiments. American Political Science Review99:283-300.
29.
JacksonRobert A.2002. Gubernatorial and senatorial campaign mobilization of voters. Political Research Quarterly55:825-44.
30.
JonesBryan D.1994. Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics: Attention, choice and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
JonesBryan D.BaumgartnerFrank R.2005. The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
KamCindy D.FranzeseRobert J.Jr.2007. Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33.
KanazawaSatoshi. 1998. A possible solution to the paradox of voter turnout. Journal of Politics60:974-95.
34.
KanazawaSatoshi. 2000. A new solution to the collective action problem: The paradox of voter turnout. American Sociological Review65:433-42.
35.
LauRichardRedlawskDavid P.1997. Voting correctly. American Political Science Review91:585-98.
36.
LauRichardRedlawskDavid P.2001. Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science45:951-71.
37.
LauRichardRedlawskDavid P.2006. How voters decide: Information processing during election campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LeighleyJan E.VedlitzArnold. 1999. Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. Journal of Politics61:1092-1114.
39.
MarchJames Q.1994. A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Free Press.
40.
MichelsonMelissa R.2003. Getting out the Latino vote: How door-to-door canvassing influences voter turnout in rural central California. Political Behavior25:247-65.
41.
MichelsonMelissa R.2006a. Mobilizing the Latino youth vote: Some experimental results. Social Science Quarterly87:1188-1206.
42.
MichelsonMelissa R.2006b. Mobilizing Latinos for a ballot proposition. Latino(a) Research Review6 (1-2): 33-49.
43.
MichelsonMelissa R.BedollaLisa GarciaMcConnellMargaret A.2009. Heeding the call: The effect of targeted two-round phone banks on voter turnout. Journal of Politics71:1549-63.
44.
NickersonDavid W.2007. Quality is job one: Volunteer and professional phone calls. American Journal of Political Science51:269-82.
45.
NickersonDavid W.2008. Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments. American Political Science Review102:49-58.
46.
NivenDavid. 2001. The limits of mobilization: Turnout evidence from state house primaries. Political Behavior23: 335-50.
47.
NivenDavid. 2004. The mobilization solution? Face-to-face contact and voter turnout in a municipal election. Journal of Politics66:868-84.
48.
PlutzerEric. 2002. Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review96:41-56.
49.
RamirezRicardo. May 2003. Where no party has gone before. . . . Non-partisan Latino voter mobilization and the issue of contactability. Paper presented at the Nation of Immigrants conference, Berkeley, CA.
50.
RamirezRicardoGerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.2003. An evaluation of NALEO’s 2002 voter mobilization campaign. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University.
51.
RikerWilliam H.OrdeshookPeter C.1968. A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review62: 25-42.
52.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. Voting and registration in the election of November 2000: Population characteristics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
53.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. Voting and registration in the election of November 2002: Population characteristics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
54.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2006. Voting and registration in the election of November 2004: Population characteristics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
55.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2008. Voting and registration in the election of November 2006: Population characteristics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
56.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2009. Voter turnout increases by 5 million in 2008 presidential election. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
57.
WongJanelle. 2005. Mobilizing Asian American voters: A field experiment. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 60:102-14.
58.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
