Civic-republican theories of democracy assume high levels of social capital within the community and within public bureaucracies will be associated with better government performance. This article tests these assumptions by analyzing the impact of community and organizational social capital on the achievements of English local governments. The interdependence between social capital and performance is modeled using a range of primary and secondary data. The statistical results suggest that both community and organizational social capital are positively related to government performance. However, further analysis revealed that the combined effects of these two forms of social capital are not beneficial for performance.
AdlerPaul S.KwonSeok-Woo. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review27:17-40.
2.
AldrichDaniel P.CrookKevin. 2008. Strong civil society as a double-edged sword. Political Research Quarterly61:379-89.
3.
AlmondGabriel A.VerbaSidney. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
AndrewsRhysCowellRichardDowneJames. 2008. Support for active citizenship and public service performance: An empirical analysis of English local authorities. Policy & Politics36:225-43.
5.
ArmstrongHarveyTaylorJim. 2000. Regional economics and policy. 3rd ed.Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6.
ArmstrongJ. ScottOvertonTerry S.1977. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research14:396-402.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan N.1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-sectional data. American Political Science Review89:634-47.
9.
BoixCharlesPosnerDaniel N.1998. Social capital: Explaining its origins and effects on government performance. British Journal of Political Science28:686-93.
10.
BourdieuPierre. 1980. Le capital social: Notes provisoires. Actes de le Recherché Scientifique et Sociale30:3-6.
11.
BowermanBruce L.O’ConnellRichard T.1990. Linear statistical models: An applied approach. 2nd ed.Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
12.
BoyneGeorge A.2003. Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13:367-94.
BurtRonald S.1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly42:339-65.
15.
CaseyTerence. 2004. Social capital and regional economies in Britain. Political Studies52:96-117.
16.
CiglerAllanJoslynMark R.2002. The extensiveness of group membership and social capital. The impact on political tolerance attitudes. Political Research Quarterly55:7-25.
17.
ClaibournMichelle P.MartinPaul S.2007. The third face of social capital: How membership in voluntary associations improves policy accountability. Political Research Quarterly60:192-201.
18.
CoffeHildeGeysBenny. 2005. Institutional performance and social capital: An application to the local government level. Journal of Urban Affairs27:485-502.
19.
ColemanJames S.1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94 (Suppl.): S95-S120.
20.
ColemanJames S.1994. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
CusackThomas R.1999. Social capital, institutional structures, and democratic performance: A comparative study of German local governments. European Journal of Political Research35:1-34.
22.
Department of Environment, Transport and Regions. 2000Indices of multiple deprivation. London: Department of Environment, Transport and Regions.
23.
DowneJamesMartinSteve. 2007. Regulation inside government: Processes and impacts of inspection of local public services. Policy & Politics35:215-32.
24.
ElkinsDavid J.SimeonRichard E. B.1979. A cause in search of its effect, or what does political culture explain?Comparative Politics11:127-45.
25.
FlorinPaulWandersmanAbraham. 1990. An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary community organizations and development: Insights for empowerment through research. American Journal of Community Psychology18:41-54.
26.
FlorinPaulWandersmanAbraham. 1990. An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary community organizations and development: Insights for empowerment through research. American Journal of Community Psychology18:41-54.
27.
FukuyamaFrancis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
28.
Gelfland MicheleJ.ErezMiriamAycanZeynep. 2007. Cross-cultural organizational behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology58:479-514.
29.
GibbsJack P.1977. Social control, deterrence and perspectives on social order. Social Forces56:408-23.
30.
Gould-WilliamsJulian. 2003. The importance of HR practices and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: A study of public-sector organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management14:28-54.
31.
GrosskopfS.YaisawamgS.1990. Economies of scope in the provision of local public services. National Tax Journal43:61-74.
32.
HairJoseph F.Jr.AndersonRolph E.TathamRonald L.BlackWilliam C.1998. Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
HarrisMargaretYoungPatricia. 2009. Developing community and social cohesion through grassroots bridge-building: An exploration. Policy & Politics37:517-34.
34.
HirschmanAlbert O.1970. Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Hoxby CarolineM.1996. How teachers’ unions affect education production. Quarterly Journal of Economics111:671-718.
36.
JackmanRobert W.MillerRoss A.1998. Social capital and politics. Annual Review of Political Science1:47-73.
37.
KnackStephen. 2002. Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the states. American Journal of Political Science46:772-85.
38.
KogutBruceZanderUgo. 1996. What do firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science7:502-18.
39.
KramerRoderick. 1999. Trust and distrust: Emerging questions, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology50:569-91.
40.
LangbeinLaura. 2000. Ownership, empowerment and productivity: Some empirical evidence on the causes and consequences of employee discretion. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management19:427-49.
41.
LangbeinLauraJorstadConnie. 2004. Productivity in the workplace: Cops, culture, communication, cooperation, and collusion. Political Research Quarterly57:65-79.
42.
LeanaCarrie R.PilFrits K.2006. Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science17:353-66.
43.
LeanaCarrie R.Van BurenHarry J.1999. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review24:538-55.
44.
LerouxKelly. 2007. Nonprofits as civic intermediaries: The role of community-based organizations in promoting political participation. Urban Affairs Review42:410-22.
45.
LowndesVivienPratchettLawrenceStokerGerry. 2006. Local political participation: The impact of rules-in-use. Public Administration84:539-61.
46.
MazmanianDaniel A.SabatierPaul A.1989. Implementation and public policy: With a new postscript. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
47.
MillerGary. 1992. Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. New York: Cambridge University.
48.
Moe TerryM.2009. Collective bargaining and the performance of public schools. American Journal of Political Science53:156-74.
49.
MontgomeryJohn D.2000. Social capital as a policy resource. Policy Sciences33:227-43.
50.
NahapietJanineGhoshalSumantra. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review23:242-66.
51.
NobletAndrew J.RodwellJohn J.2009. Integrating job stress and social exchange theories to predict employee strain in reformed public sector contexts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19:555-78.
52.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2002. Urban and rural area definitions: A user guide. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
53.
PollittChristopherBouckaertGeert. 2004. Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54.
PortesAlejandro. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology24:1-24.
55.
PurdueDerek. 2001. Neighbourhood governance: Leadership, trust and social capital. Urban Studies38:2211-24.
56.
PutnamRobert D.1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
PutnamRobert D.2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
58.
RaineyHal G.1993. A theory of goal ambiguity in public organizations. Research in Public Administration2:121-66.
59.
RevelliFederico. 2010. Spend more, get more? An inquiry into English local government performance. Oxford Economic Papers62:185-207.
60.
RiceTom W.FeldmanJan L.1997. Civic culture and democracy from Europe to America. Journal of Politics59:1143-72.
61.
RiceTom W.SumbergAlexander F.1997. Civic culture and government performance in the American states. Publius: The Journal of Federalism27:99-114.
62.
Roederer-RynningChristilla. 2007. Farm conservatism in France: Revisiting the weak state thesis. Journal of European Public Policy14:1010-27.
63.
RothsteinBo. 2001. Social capital in the social democratic welfare state. Politics & Society29:207-41.
64.
ScottJohn. 1999. Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.
65.
ScottW. Richard. 2001. Institutions and organizations. 2nd ed.London: Sage.
66.
SelznickPhillip. 1957. Leadership and administration: A sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL: Harper & Row.
67.
SharpeL. J.NewtonKenneth. 1984. Does politics matter?Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
68.
SmithMark A.2002. Ballot initiatives and the democratic citizen. Journal of Politics64:892-903.
69.
StackCarol B.1974. All our kin: Strategies for survival in a Black Community. New York: Harper & Row.
70.
TavitsMargaret. 2006. Making democracy work more? Exploring the linkage between social capital and government performance. Political Research Quarterly59:211-25.
71.
TrawickMichelle W.HowsenRoy M.2006. Crime and community heterogeneity: Race, ethnicity, and religion. Applied Economics Letters13:341-45.
72.
TsaiWenpinGhoshalSumantra. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intra-firm networks. Academy of Management Journal41:464-78.
73.
ValkovNikolay. 2009. Membership in voluntary organizations and democratic performance: European post-communist countries in comparative perspective. Communist and Post-Communist Studies42:1-21.
74.
WalkerRichard M.EnticottGareth. 2004. Using multiple informants in public administration: Revisiting the managerial values and actions debate. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14:417-34.
75.
WallisJoeDolleryBrian. 2006. Revitalizing the contribution non-profit organizations can make to the provision of human services. International Journal of Social Economics33:491-511.
76.
WillemAnnickScarboroughHarry. 2006. Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Human Relations59:1343-70.
77.
WilsonPatricia A.1997. Building social capital: A learning agenda for the twenty-first century. Urban Studies34:745-60.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
