This article examines the extent to which race and ethnicity affect mobility to leadership positions within Congress. The authors utilize survival analysis to examine the rate at which legislators attained committee leadership positions between the 101st and 108th Congresses. The results show that black legislators attain leadership positions faster than white legislators. This may be because of the tendency for black members of Congress (MCs) to sit on less prestigious committees than white MCs, which creates greater opportunity for institutional promotion. Ethnicity, on the other hand, does not matter to mobility as Latinos acquire leadership positions at the same rate as non-Latino legislators.
AdlerE. Scott. 2002. Why congressional reforms fail: Reelection and the House committee system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AdlerE. ScottLapinskiJohn S.1997. Demand-side theory and congressional committee composition: A constituency characteristics approach. American Journal of Political Science41:895-918.
3.
AldrichJohnRohdeDavid. 2000. The consequences of party organization in the House: The role of the majority and minority parties in conditional party government. In Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era, ed. BondJon R.FleisherRichard, 31-72. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
4.
AmerMildred L.2005a. Black members of the United States Congress: 1870–2005. Congressional Research Report for Congress, Order Code RL 30378. http://opencrs.com/document/RL30378/2005-08-04 (accessed June 15, 2009).
5.
AmerMildred L.2005b. Women in the United States Congress: 1917–2005. Congressional Research Report for Congress, Order Code RL 30261. http://opencrs.com/document/RL30261/2005-06-21 (accessed June 15, 2009).
6.
BarretoMatt A.SeguraGary M.WoodsNathan D.2004. The mobilizing effect of majority-minority districts on Latino turnout. American Political Science Review98:65-75.
7.
BarretoMatt A.VillarrealMarioWoodsNathan D.2005. Metropolitan Latino political behavior: Voter turnout and candidate preference in Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Affairs27:71-91.
8.
BoboLawrence D.GilliamFranklin D.1990. Race, sociopolitical participation, and black empowerment. American Political Science Review84:377-93.
9.
CannonDavid T.1999. Race, redistricting, and representation: The unintended consequences of black majority districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
ClevesMarioGouldWilliam W.GutierrezRoberto. 2004. An introduction to survival analysis using stata, Revised Edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
11.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMatthew. 1993. Legislative leviathan: Party government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Cramer WalshKatherine. 2002. Enlarging representation: Women bringing marginalized perspectives to floor debate in the House of Representatives. In Women transforming Congress, ed. RosenthalCindy Simon, 370-98. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
FennoRichard F.1973. Congressmen in committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
15.
FowlerJames. 2006a. Connecting the Congress: A study of cosponsorship networks. Political Analysis14:456-87.
16.
FowlerJames. 2006b. Legislative cosponsorship networks in the U.S. House and Senate. Social Networks28:454-65.
17.
FriedmanSally. 1996. House Committee assignments of women and minority newcomers, 1965–1994. Legislative Studies Quarterly21:73-81.
18.
FrischScott A.KellySean Q.2004. Self-selection reconsidered: House committee assignment requests and constituency requests. Political Research Quarterly57:325-36.
19.
FrischScott A.KellySean Q.2006. Committee assignment politics in the U.S. Senate: Democratic leaders and democratic committee assignments, 1953-1994. Congress & the Presidency33:1-23.
20.
GayClaudine. 2001. The effect of black congressional representation on political participation. American Political Science Review95:589-602.
21.
GilliamFrank D.1996. Exploring minority empowerment: Symbolic politics, governing coalitions, and traces of political style in Los Angeles. American Journal of Political Science40:56-81.
22.
GrofmanBernardHandleyLisaNiemiRichard. 1992. Minority representation and the quest for voting equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GrosecloseTimothy J.StewartCharlesIII. 1998. The value of committee seats in the House, 1947–91. American Journal of Political Science42:453-74.
24.
HallRichard L.1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
HallRichard L.EvansC. Lawrence. 1990. The power of subcommittees. Journal of Politics52:335-355.
26.
HawkesworthMary E.2003. Congressional enactments of race-gender: Towards a theory of raced-gendered institutions. American Political Science Review91:529-50.
27.
HeberligEric S.2003. Congressional parties, fundraising, and committee ambition. Political Research Quarterly56:151-61.
28.
HinckleyBarbara. 1969. Seniority in the committee leadership selection of Congress. Midwest Journal of Political Science13:613-30.
29.
HinckleyBarbara. 1970. Congressional leadership selection and support: A comparative analysis. Journal of Politics32:268-287.
30.
HowellSusan E.FaganDeborah. 1988. Race and trust in government. Public Opinion Quarterly52:343-50.
31.
KatzJonathan N.SalaBrian R.1996. Careerism, committee assignments, and the electoral connection. American Political Science Review90:21-33.
32.
KrehbielKeith. 1991. Information and legislative organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33.
LeightonWayne A.LopezEdward J.2002. Committee assignments and the cost of party loyalty. Political Research Quarterly55:59-90.
34.
LublinDavid. 1997. The paradox of representation: Racial gerrymandering and minority interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
MaltzmanForrest. 1997. Competing principals: Committees, parties, and the organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
MayhewDavid. 1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward2006. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
McClainPaula D. (1993). Minority group influence: Agenda setting, formulation, and public policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
39.
MenifieldCharles E.JonesCharles E.2001. African American representation in Congress: Then and now. In Representation of minority groups in the U.S., ed. MenifieldCharles E.JonesCharles E., 13-37. Lanham, MD: Austin and Winfield.
40.
MungerMichael C.1988. The allocation of desirable committee assignments: Extended queues versus committee expansion. American Journal of Political Science32:317-44.
41.
NaffKatherine. 1995. Subjective vs. objective discrimination in government: Adding to the picture of barriers to the advancement of women. Political Research Quarterly48:535-57.
42.
National Association of Latino Elected Officials. 2005. National directory of Latino elected officials. www.naleo.org (accessed March 8, 2006).
43.
NortonNoelle H.2002. Transforming policy from the inside: Participation in committee. In Women transforming Congress, ed. RosenthalCindy Simon, 316-40. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
44.
OleszekWalter. 2001. Congressional procedures and the policy process. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
45.
OwensJohn E.1997. The return of party government in the U.S. House of Representatives: Central leadership-Committee relations in the 104th Congress. British Journal of Political Science27:247-272.
46.
PantojaAdrian D.SeguraGary M.2004. Does ethnicity matter? Descriptive representation in legislatures and political alienation among Latinos. Social Science Quarterly84:441-60.
47.
PolsbyNelson W.GallaherMiriamRundquistBarry. 1969. The growth of the seniority system in the House of Representatives. American Political Science Review57:787-806.
48.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 1991. Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
RoccaMichael S.SanchezGabriel R.2008. The effect of race and ethnicity on bill sponsorship and cosponsorship in congress. American Politics Research36:130-152.
50.
RohdeDavid W.1991. Parties and leaders in the postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
RohdeDavid W.ShepsleKenneth. 1973. Democratic Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives: Strategic Aspects of a Social Choice Process. American Political Science Review67(3):889-905.
52.
RosenthalCindy Simon. 1997. A view of their own: Women’s committee leadership styles and state legislatures. Policy Studies Journal25:585-600.
53.
RosenthalCindy Simon. 1998. When women lead: Integrative leadership in state legislatures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54.
RosenthalCindy Simon. 2000. Gender styles in state legislative committees: Raising their voices in resolving conflict. Women & Politics21:21-45.
55.
SchneiderJudy. 2008. House committees: Categories and rules for committee assignments. Congressional Research Service, Order Code 98-151 GOV. http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/98-151_20080320.pdf (accessed June 15, 2009).
56.
SheplseKenneth. 1978. The giant jigsaw puzzle: Democratic committee assignments in the modern house. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
SmithSteven S.RayBruce A.1983. The impact of congressional reform: House democratic committee assignments. Congress & the Presidency10:219-40.
58.
SteinRobert M.BickersKenneth N.1995. Perpetuating the pork barrel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SwainCarol M.1992. Changing patterns of African-American representation in Congress. In The atomistic Congress, ed. HertzkeAllen D.PetersRonaldJr., 107-40. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
60.
SwainCarol M.1993. Black faces, black interests: The representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
SwersMichele L.2002a. The difference women make. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
SwersMichele L.2002b. Transforming the agenda: Analyzing gender differences in women’s issue bill sponsorship. In Women transforming Congress, ed. RosenthalCindy Simon, 260-83. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
63.
TameriusKaren L.1995. Sex, gender and leadership in the representation of women. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
64.
TateKatherine. 2001. The political representation of blacks in Congress: Does race matter?Legislative Studies Quarterly26:623-38.
65.
TateKatherine. 2004. Black faces in the mirror: African Americans and their representatives in the US Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
TheriaultSean M.2006. Party polarization in the US Congress: Member replacement and member adaptation. Party Politics12:483-503.
67.
UhlanerCarole J.GarciaF. Chris. 2002. Latino public opinion. In Understanding public opinion, ed. NorranderBarbaraWilcoxClyde, 77-101. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
VegaArturoFirestoneJuanita M.1995. The effects of gender on congressional behavior and the substantive representation of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly20:213-22.
70.
WawroGregory J.2000. Legislative entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
71.
WhitbyKenny J.1997. The color of representation: Congressional behavior and black interests. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
72.
WolbrechtChristina. 2002. Female legislators and the women’s rights agenda: From feminine mystique to feminist era. In Women transforming Congress, ed. RosenthalCindy Simon, 170-239. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
